Volume 9, Issue 2 (2019)                   Naqshejahan 2019, 9(2): 135-144 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Architecture Department, Architecture and Urbanism Faculty, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Architecture Department, Architecture and Urbanism Faculty, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran , y.shahbazi@tabriziau.ac.ir
3- Architecture Department, Architecture & Urban Planning Faculty, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (5432 Views)
Building skins and facades have an important role in reducing energy consumption. The double skin façade (DSF) as a passive solar system reduces significantly the heating load during cold periods. However, during warm periods or in areas with warm climates, the building’s cooling load increases due to the high temperature of the intermediate cavity. The use of shades is one of the effective approaches to building’s cooling load. The fixed shades block solar beam radiation in winter. On the other hand, movable shading devices can be adjusted in optimal angle to changing outdoor conditions in which more effective control of sky diffuse radiation may be obtained. In this paper, the effects of horizontal and vertical drop-down fixed and movable shades have been investigated on double skin facade energy consumption in office buildings. The office building and parametric modeling of shades are created using Rhino software and Grasshopper plug-in, respectively. A standard office room with the dimensions of 5m×4m and a 3m height and a southward window was examined in the modeling process. The simulation results suggest that movable shades have more efficient function than their fix state. The horizontal moving shade has also the most optimal state and has the lowest annual energy consumption. The total amount of energy consumption in horizontal movable shades, the most optimal option, is 34 % compared to horizontal drop-down fix shade, is 11.87% and 1.37%, respectively, compared to the fix and moving vertical drop-down and is 50.69% more efficient compared to double skin facade without shades.
Full-Text [PDF 1295 kb]   (2888 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2018/10/9 | Accepted: 2018/12/6 | Published: 2019/09/21

References
1. نمای دوپوسته، سایه‌انداز کرکره‌ای، شبیه‌سازی پارامتریک انرژی، دیوا، دیزاین‌بیلدر 1- Zhou J, Chen Y. A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(4):1321-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.017 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
2. Gratia E, De Herde A. Greenhouse effect in double-skin facade. Energy Build. 2007;39(2):199-211. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.06.004 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
3. Hashemi N, Fayaz R, Sarshar M. Thermal behavior of a ventilated double skin facade in hot arid climate. Energy Build. 2010;42(10):1823-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.019 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
4. W. Lou W, Huang M, Zhang M, Lin N. Experimental and zonal modeling for wind pressures on double-skin facades of a tall building. Energy Build. 2012;54:179-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.06.025 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
5. Zhou J, Chen Y. A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(4):1321-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.017 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
6. Ghadamian H, Ghadimi M, Shakouri M, Moghadasi M, Moghadasi M. Analytical solution for energy modeling of double skin façades buildings. Energy Build. 2012;50:158-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.034 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
7. Ghadimi M, Ghadamian H, Hamidi AA, Shakouri M, Ghahremanian S. Numerical analysis and parametric study of the thermal behavior in multiple-skin façades. Energy Build. 2013;67:44-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.014 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
8. Mateus MN, Pinto A, Graca G. Validation of EnergyPlus thermal simulation of a double skin naturally and mechanically ventilated test cell. Energy Build. 2014;75:511-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.043 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
9. M. Farrokhzad, Z. Nayebi. Double skin glass façade and its effect on saving energy. Int J Archit Eng Urban Plan. 2014;24(2):65-74. [مهدن]
10. Stec WJ, Van Paassen AHC, Maziarz A. Modelling the double skin façade with plants. Energy Build. 2005;37(5):419-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.008 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
11. Yao J. An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements. Build Environ. 2014;71:24-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.09.011 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
12. Tzempelikos A, Athienitis A. The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy. 2007;81(3):369-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.015 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
13. Al Dakheel J, Aoul K. Building Applications, opportunities and challenges of active shading systems: A state-of-the-art review. Energ. 2017;10(10):1672. [DOI:10.3390/en10101672 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
14. Lee DS, Koo SH, Seong YB, Jo JH. Evaluating thermal and lighting energy performance of shading devices on kinetic façades. Sustain. 2016;8(9):883. [DOI:10.3390/su8090883 Add to Citavi project by DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.