Volume 10, Issue 2 (2020)                   BSNT 2020, 10(2): 137-152 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saligheh E, Saadatjoo P. Impact of Central Courtyard Proportions on Passive Cooling Potential in Hot and Humid Regions (Case Study: Single-story Buildings in Bandar Abbas). BSNT. 2020; 10 (2) :137-152
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-40649-en.html
1- Architecture Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Architecture Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran , paria.saadatjoo@tabrizu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1533 Views)
Aims: The central courtyard can play an important role in reducing energy consumption, increasing shading, enhancing the flow of passage and creating evaporative cooling in windphil buildings. This paper seeks to examine the role of central courtyard proportions in the amount of shading, radiant energy received, cooling load and natural ventilation potential.
Methods: The research method in this research is a descriptive-analytical one in which the software of Design builder, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and Ecotect 2011 were applied to investigate the effect of central yard width change on wind flow pattern, shading pattern and the amount of radiant energy received and the calculation cooling load of windphil architecture.
Findings: Comparing U-shaped quadruple buildings with a central courtyard with a fixed volume-to surface ratio, the 4-meter-wide courtyard building model is the best option. Changing the width of central courtyard from 4 to 10 meters resulted in a %13 increase in cooling load and a %10 decrease in shaded areas. However, increasing the width of the courtyard from 4 to 6 meters resulted in a speed reduction of 18.75% and a change of width from 6 to 10 meters lead to a 6% increase in flow rate.
Conclusion: Increasing the width of the central courtyard degrades the passive cooling potential of the building. As a result, a courtyard would perform as an efficient passive cooling system when its proportions are approximately 1: 2.5.
Full-Text [PDF 2104 kb]   (229 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2020/02/12 | Accepted: 2020/03/14 | Published: 2020/09/20

1. Pérez-Lombard L, Ortiz J, Pout C. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy Build. 2008;40(3):394-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007]
2. Noroozian N. Localization pattern for assessment of energy efficiency in buildings in Tehran. Naqsh-e Jahan. 2016;6(3):63-74. [Persian] [Link]
3. Us Energy Information Administration. International energy outlook 2016. Washington D.C: Energy Information Administration; 2016. [Link]
4. Chan H-Y, Riffat SB, Zhu J. Review of passive solar heating and cooling technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(2):781-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.030]
5. Porta-Gándara MA, Rubio E, Fernandez JL, Muñoz VG. Effect of passive techniques on interior temperature in small houses in the dry, hot climate of Northwestern Mexico. Renew Energy. 2002;26(1):121-35. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00101-X]
6. Zhou L, Haghighat F. Optimization of ventilation system design and operation in office environment, Part I: Methodology. Build Environ. 2009;44(4):651-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.009]
7. Taleb HM. Natural ventilation as energy efficient solution for achieving low-energy houses in Dubai. Energy Build. 2015;99:284-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.019]
8. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zhang G. A study on terraced apartments and their natural ventilation performance in hot and humid regions. Build Simul. 2018;11(2):359-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12273-017-0407-7]
9. Rezaei Hariri MT, Najaf Khosravi S, Saadatjoo P. The impact of high-rise building form on climatic comfort at the pedestrian level. J Architect Urban Plann. 2017;9(17):61-77. [Persian] [Link]
10. Moradi S, Matin M, Fayyaz R, Dehbashi Sharif M. Typology of Tabriz traditional courtyard houses based on physical criteria related to the climatic performance of the central courtyard. Int J Urban Rural Manag. 2018;17(51):106-87. [Persian] [Link]
11. Mahdavinejad M, Moradchelleh A, Dehghani S, Mirhosseini SM. The adoption of central courtyard as a traditional archetype in contemporary architecture of Iran. World Appl Sci J. 2013;21(6):802-11. [Link]
12. Memarian GH. Introduction to Iranian residential architecture, Introverted Typology. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2009. p. 480. [Persian] [Link]
13. Vakilinejad R, Mehdizadeh Seraj F, Mofidi Shemirani SM. Principles of passive cooling systems in vernacular architectural elements of Iran. Iran Architect Urban. 2013;(5):147-59. [Persian] [Link]
14. Prelgauskas E. Enhanced natural ventilation in hot arid lands (DES 20). Australia: The Royal Australian Institute of Architects; 2003. [Link]
15. Tablada A, Blocken B, Carmeliet J, Troyer F, Verschure H. The influence of courtyard geometry on air flow and thermal comfort: CFD and thermal comfort simulations. In; Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture; 2005 Nov 13-16; Beirut, Lebanon. [Link]
16. Sharples S, Bensalem R. Airflow in courtyard and atrium buildings in the urban environment: a wind tunnel study. Solar Energy. 2001;70(3):237-44. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00092-X]
17. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Najaf Khosravi S, Kaveh N. Effect of courtyard proportion on natural ventilation efficiency. Int J Adv Mech Civil Engin. 2013;3(5):92-7. [Link]
18. Ghiabaklou Z. Fundamentals of building physics 4 (passive cooling). Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Press; 2013. [Persian] [Link]
19. Abazari T. Optimization of canopy performance to reduce summer heat cooling in buildings, sample: Anarak residential complex design [Dissertation]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University; 2016. [Persian] [Link]
20. Attarian K, Najjar BSA. Defining sustainability characteristics for residential buildings in hot and humid climate. Naqsh-e Jahan. 2018;8(3):161-70. [Persian] [Link]
21. Samadzadehyazdi S, Khalili MJ, Samadzadehyazdi S, Mahdavinejad M. Windphil poetic in architecture: energy efficient strategies in modern buildings of Iran. Int J Civil Environ Engin. 2018;12(6):651-8. [Link]
22. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zarkesh A. Porosity rendering in high-performance architecture: wind-driven natural ventilation and porosity distribution patterns. Armanshahr Architect Urban Dev. 2019;12(26):73-88. [Link]
23. Littlefair PJ, Santamouris M, Alvarez S, Dupagne A, Hall D, Teller J, et al. Environmental site layout planning: solar access, microclimate and passive cooling in urban areas. London: Building Research Establishment Ltd (BRE); 2000. [Link]
24. Tablada A, Blocken B, Carmeliet J, De Troyer F, Herschure H. Geometry of building's courtyards to favour natural ventilation :comparison between wind tunnel experiment and numerical simulation. In; Proceedings of the 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference; 2005 Sep 27-29; Tokyo, Japan. [Link]
25. Ok V, Yasa E, Ozgunler M. An experimental study of the effect of surface openings on air flow caused by wind in courtyard buildings. Architect Sci Rev. 2008;51(3):263-8. [Link] [DOI:10.3763/asre.2008.5131]
26. Al-Hafith O, B K S, Bradbury S, de Wilde P. The impact of courtyard parameters on its shading level an experimental study in Baghdad, Iraq. Energy Procedia. 2017;134:99-109. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.539]
27. Xu X, Luo F, Wang W, Hong T, Fu X. Performance-based evaluation of courtyard design in China's cold-winter hot-summer climate regions. Sustainability. 2018;10:1-19. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su10113950]
28. Manioğlu G, Oral GK. Effect of courtyard shape factor on heating and cooling energy loads in hot-dry climatic zone. Energy Procedia. 2015;78:2100-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.250]
29. Taban M, Pourjafar MR, Bemanian M, Heidari S. Determining optimal courtyard pattern in Dezful traditional houses by relying on shadow analysis. Bagh-e Nazar. 2014;10(27):39-48. [Persian] [Link]
30. Rajapaksha I, Nagai H, Okumiya M. A ventilated courtyard as a passive cooling strategy in the warm humid tropics. Renew Energy. 2003;28(11):1755-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00012-0]
31. Ghodsi M, Daneshjoo K, Mofidi Shemirani SM. Impact of geometric indicators on residential thermal behavior in hot arid climate (case study: Yazd). Naqsh-e Jahan. 2018;8(3):143-8. [Persian] [Link]
32. Office HPM. Meteorological Statistics Report 1974-2004. 2006. [Link]
33. Omidvar K, Rostami Gourani E, Beyranvandzadeh M, Ebrahimi S. Investigating Climatic Impacts on Native Architecture of Iran's South Coast: Bandar Abbas. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Islamic Geographers of the Islamic World; 2010 Apr 14-16; University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. [Persian] [Link]
34. Yousefian S, Pourjafar MR, Ahmadpour Kalhroudi N. Impacts of high-rise buildings form on climatic comfort with emphasis on airflow through ENVI-met software. Naqsh-e Jahan. 2017;7(2):1-10. [Persian] [Link]
35. Javanroodi K, Mahdavinejad M, Nik VM. Impacts of urban morphology on reducing cooling load and increasing ventilation potential in hot-arid climate. Appl Energy. 2018;231:714-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.116]
36. Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, et al. AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Engin Ind Aerodyn. 2008;96(10-11):1749-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058]
37. Hormozgan Meteorological Department. Golbad, Bandar Abbas, for the period 1957 to 2011 [Internet]. Bandar Abbas: Hormozgan Meteorological Department; 2018 [cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: http://www.hormozganmet.ir/images/synoptic/Windrose/bandarabbas.JPG- 2019.12.25. [Link]
38. Karava P, Stathopoulos T, Athienitis AK. Airflow assessment in cross-ventilated buildings with operable façade elements. Build Environ. 2011;46(1):266-79. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.022]
39. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Zarkesh A, Motevali Haghighi H. A review on interaction of innovative building envelope technologies and solar energy gain. Energy Procedia. 2017;141:24-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.006]
40. Taraz M, Taghizadeh K, Azizi Ghohroudi M. Introducing an innovative variable building layers system (V.B.L.S). Naqsh-e Jahan. 2015;5(2):55-64. [Persian] [Link]
41. Ghanbaran A, Hosseinpour MA. Assessment of design parameter influence on energy efficiency in educational buildings in Tehran's climate. Naqsh-e Jahan. 2016;6(3):51-62. [Persian] [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author