Volume 12, Issue 1 (2022)                   Naqshejahan 2022, 12(1): 59-83 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sotodeh S, Ghobadian V. Explaining Contemporization and Systematic Adaptation of Alborz Industrial Heritage based on Sustainable Architecture. Naqshejahan. 2022; 12 (1) :59-83
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-58419-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , vah.qobadiyan@iauctb.ac.ir
Abstract:   (394 Views)
Aims: In recent years, the increase in the number of construction projects in cities has led to an increase in the demolition of buildings that still have a useful life. Early demolition causes various damages in all dimensions and as a result reduces stability, especially in developing countries. The present study has tried to explain the modernization and adaptation of a system based on sustainable architecture in the Karaj Iron Foundry.
Methods: This research is a qualitative type with an inductive strategy that uses documentary studies and field collection in data collection and uses coding methods to reduce and analyze data. The potential of the Karaj Melting iron factory has been determined based on the ARP method. In the last step, the Shannon coefficient is used to verify the results for each dimension.
Results: According to the results, the highest Shannon coefficient is related to rules, regulations, and the lowest is related to decorations. The contemporization of an industrial space is something that will occur in the context of its design. But this emphasis is caused by placing collective and human spaces in the background of industrial spaces.
Conclusion: The visitor should draw a clear and appropriate picture of the site in the past. Finally, this study has provided solutions to improve the current situation of construction and prevent the demolition of buildings that have a useful life in the Karaj Iron Foundry, which has considered maintenance, adaptation, and modernization as an important cause of these demolitions.
Full-Text [PDF 1624 kb]   (294 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2021/11/2 | Accepted: 2022/01/29 | Published: 2022/03/26

References
1. Subiza-Pérez M, Pasanen T, Ratcliffe E, Lee K, Bornioli A, de Bloom J, Korpela K. Exploring psychological restoration in favorite indoor and outdoor urban places using a top-down perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2021 Dec 1;78:101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101706
2. Kanna Gopinath A, Ramadoss R. Review on structural health monitoring for restoration of heritage buildings. Materialstoday Proceedings. 2021 Jan 1;43:1534-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.318 [Article] [DOI]
3. Nagy G, Ashra F. HBIM platform & smart sensing as a tool for monitoring and visualizing energy performance of heritage buildings. Developments in the Built Environment. 2021 Sep 1;8:100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100056
4. Sardaro R, La Sala P, De Pascale G, Faccilongo N. The conservation of cultural heritage in rural areas: Stakeholder preferences regarding historical rural buildings in Apulia, southern Italy. Land Use Policy. 2021 Oct 1;109:105662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105662 [Article] [DOI]
5. Elabd N M, MansourL Y M, Khodier M. Utilizing innovative technologies to achieve resilience in heritage buildings preservation. Developments in the Built Environment. 2021 Sep 1;8:100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100058 [Article] [DOI]
6. Nadkarni R R, Puthuvayi B. A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering. 2020 Sep 17:101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814 [Article] [DOI]
7. Figueiredo R, Romão X, Paupério E. Component-based flood vulnerability modelling for cultural heritage buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2021 Jul 1;61:102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102323
8. Ganobjak M, Brunner S, Wernery J. Aerogel materials for heritage buildings: Materials, properties and case studies. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2020 Mar 1;42:81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.09.007 [Article] [DOI]
9. Della Torre S. Italian perspective on the planned preventive conservation of architectural heritage. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2021, 10(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.008
10. Torres-González M, Prieto A J, Alejandre FJ, Blasco-Lópeza FJ. Digital management focused on the preventive maintenance of World Heritage Sites. Automation in Construction. 2021 Sep 1;129:103813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103813 [Article] [DOI]
11. Che W, Yang M, Li J. The impact of internet celebrity economy on sustainable city design: From the perspectives of economics and carbon emissions. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Dec 29:103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103631
12. Narayanan A, Jenamani M, Mahanty B. Determinants of sustainability and prosperity in Indian cities. Habitat International. 2021 Dec 1;118:102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102456 [Article] [DOI]
13. Elias Bibri S. Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: An evidence synthesis approach to a comprehensive state-of-the-art literature review. Sustainable Futures. 2021 Mar 28:100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100047 [Article] [DOI]
14. Ciumasu I.M. Dynamic decision trees for building resilience into future eco-cities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2013 Nov 1;80(9):1804-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.010 [Article] [DOI]
15. Schraven D, Joss S, de Jong M. Past, present, future: Engagement with sustainable urban development through 35 city labels in the scientific literature 1990–2019. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 Apr 10;292:125924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125924 [Article] [DOI]
16. Benites A J, Simões A F. Assessing the urban sustainable development strategy: An application of a smart city services sustainability taxonomy. Ecological Indicators. 2021 Aug 1;127:107734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107734 [Article] [DOI]
17. Ragheb A, Aly R, Ghada A. Toward sustainable urban development of historical cities: Case study of Fouh City, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021 Jul 1, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.006 [Article] [DOI]
18. Van Dijk M P. Beijing and Rotterdam Eco Cities? Using 100 Criteria for a Classification of Ecological Cities Paper. Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU conference, Delft, The Netherlands; 2010 October 25-29. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:9aad21d5-b2c0-42fd-924a-8351c05becc1 [Article] [DOI]
19. Ismaeel W S E, Adel Elsayed M. Sustainable sites in two generations of city development using GIS-MCDM and LEED LT and SS categories. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022 Jan 1;330:129782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129782 [Article] [DOI]
20. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Larki AN, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International journal of sustainable built environment, 2014 Dec 1;3(2):235-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.003 [Article] [DOI]
21. Altamirano-Avila A, Martínez M. Urban sustainability assessment of five Latin American cities by using SDEWES index. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 Mar 10;287:125495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125495 [Article] [DOI]
22. Sarwesh P, Aneesh M. Cross layer design with weighted sum approach for extending device sustainability in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022 Feb 1;77:103478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103478 [Article] [DOI]
23. Langston C. Shen L Y. Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. International journal of strategic property management. 2007 Jan 1;11(4):193-207. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2007.9637569 [Article] [DOI]
24. Mahdavinejad M. Designerly Approach to Energy Efficiency in High-Performance Architecture Theory. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2020 Sep 10;10(2):75-83. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1399.10.2.7.5 [Article] [DOI]
25. Han Y, Mozumder P. Building-level adaptation analysis under uncertain sea-level rise. Climate Risk Management. 2021 Jan 1;32:100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100305 [Article] [DOI]
26. Shahi S, Esnaashary Esfahani M, Bachmann C, Haas C. A definition framework for building adaptation projects. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020 Dec 1;63:102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102345 [Article] [DOI]
27. Yung E H K, Chan E H W. Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat International. 2012 Jul 1;36(3):352-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001 [Article] [DOI]
28. Masud-All-Kamal M, Nursey-Bray M, Monirul Hassan S M. Challenges to building social capital through planned adaptation: Evidence from rural communities in Bangladesh. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 2021 Jan 1;3:100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100091 [Article] [DOI]
29. Conejos Sh. Designing for future building adaptive reuse using adaptSTAR. International Conference on Sustainable Urbanization: ICSU 2010 Dec 15. http://epublications.bond.edu.au/sustainable_development/41 [Article]
30. Liu S, Li Z, Teng Y, Dai L. A dynamic simulation study on the sustainability of prefabricated buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Nov 18:103551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103551 [Article] [DOI]
31. Martínez de Estarrona U, Seneviratne D, Villarejo R, Galar D. The New Asset Management: Implications of Servitization in Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):109-20. https://doi.org/10.13052/jiems2446-1822.2018.006 [Article] [DOI]
32. Pomponi F, Moncaster A. Embodied Carbon Mitigation and Reduction in the Built Environment–What Does the Evidence Say? Journal of Environmental Management. 2016 Oct 1;181:687-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036 [Article] [DOI]
33. Torabi M, Mahdavinejad M. Past and Future Trends on the Effects of Occupant Behaviour on Building Energy Consumption. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2021 Oct 27;29(2) 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.29.2.28576 [Article] [DOI]
34. Aytac D O, Arslan T V, Durak. S. Adaptive Reuse as a Strategy toward Urban Resilience. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2016 Oct 1;5(4):523–32. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p523 [Article] [DOI]
35. Munarim U, Enedir G. Environmental Feasibility of Heritage Buildings Rehabilitation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016 May 1;58:235-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.334 [Article] [DOI]
36. Heidrich O, Kamara J, Maltese S, Cecconi F R, Dejaco M C. A critical review of the developments in building adaptability. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 2017 Aug 14;35(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-03-2017-0018 [Article] [DOI]
37. Kubbinga B, Fischer A, Achterberg E, Ramkumar S, De Wit M, Van Heel P, Van Amerongen B, Buijs M, Brekelmans H. A Future Proof Built Environment. Netherlands: Circle Economy and ABN AMRO, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103656 [Article] [DOI]
38. Ghisellini P, Maddalena R, Sergio U. Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018 Mar 20;178:618-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 [Article] [DOI]
39. Adams, Katherine, Osmani M, Thorpe A, Thornback J. Circular Economy in Construction: Current Awareness. Challenges and Enablers. 2017 Feb (Vol. 170, No. 1, pp. 15-24). Thomas Telford Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011 [Article] [DOI]
40. Pomponi F, Alice M. Circular Economy for the Built Environment: A Research Framework. Journal of cleaner production. 2017 Feb 1;143:710-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055 [Article] [DOI]
41. Wilkinson SJ, Remøy H, Langston C. Sustainable building adaptation: innovations in decision-making. John Wiley & Sons; 2014 Apr 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118477151 [Article] [DOI]
42. Taraz M, Taghizade K, Azizi Ghohroudi M. Introducing an Innovative Variable Building Layers System (V.B.L.S). Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2015 Jun 10;5(2):55-64. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1394.5.2.5.8 [Article] [DOI]
43. Taban M, Pourjafar M, Bemanian M, Heidari S. Climate Impact on Architectural Ornament Analyzing the Shadow of Khavoons in Dezful Historical Context with the Use of Image Processing. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2012 Oct 10;2(2):79-90. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1391.2.2.1.3 [Article] [DOI]
44. Shahbazi M, Yeganeh M, Bamanian M. Meta-analysis of environmental vitality factors in open spaces. Motaleate Shahri. 2020 Apr 20;9(34):61-76. http://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_61318_en.html [Article]
45. Sedighi R, Panahi S, Foroutan M, Dibadj S. Effective Factors in Interpretation or Reading the Islamic Architectural Based on Transcendent Wisdom. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 Mar 10;10(4):295-303. [Persian] Available from: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-42566-fa.html [Article]
46. Yazdgerd F, Hanachi P, Talebian M. Framework of Conservation Evaluation for Dynamic Cultural World Heritage Sites. Naqshejahan-Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 Jul 10;11(2):101-19. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.2.6.1 [Article] [DOI]
47. Shahhosseini G, Moulaii M. Explaining the Role and Place of Industrial Heritage in Improving the Quality Characteristics of the Hierarchy of the City Entrances (Case study: Brick Furnaces in the Entrance of Hamedan). Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2019 Mar 10;9(1):13-22. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1398.9.1.3.2 [Article] [DOI]
48. Samadzadehyazdi S, Ansari M, Bemanian M.R. Environment Sustainability through Adaptive Reuse (Case Study: Industrial Heritage of Iran). Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2019; 9(1):67-77. [Persian] [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1398.9.1.2.1 [Article] [DOI]
49. Samadzadehyazdi S, Ansari M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemaninan M. Significance of authenticity: learning from best practice of adaptive reuse in the industrial heritage of Iran. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. 2020 Mar 15;14(3):329-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1542466 [Article] [DOI]
50. Pourzargar M. Posto-Corona Visioning for Sustainable Adaptive Reuse of Kahrzak Sugar Factory. Naqshejahan-Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2022 Jan 10;11(4):79-95. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.4.7.6 [Article] [DOI]
51. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Haghighi HM, Atashdast A. Thermal and energy performance of a user-responsive microalgae bioreactive façade for climate adaptability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022 Aug 1;52:101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101894 [Article] [DOI]
52. Valitabar M. Mohammadjavad M. Henry S. Peiman P. A dynamic vertical shading optimisation to improve view, visual comfort and operational energy. Open House International. 2021 Jul 9;46(3):401-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0031 [Article] [DOI]
53. Mazaherian H, Keynoosh A, Keynoosh A. Endogenous versus Conventional Approach to Residential Development in Revitalize Urban Identity of Iranian Islamic Architecture. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2017 Apr 10;7(1):1-12. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1396.7.1.7.2 [Article] [DOI]
54. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2019 Feb 1;43(1):71-90. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.5209 [Article] [DOI]
55. Iranishad A, Habib F. Reconnection to Context: Place-based Contemporization and Reuse of Tehran Valuable Houses. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 Jun 10;11(2):1-26. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.2.1.6 [Article] [DOI]
56. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Prieto A, Sangin H. Multi-objective optimization of building-integrated microalgae photobioreactors for energy and daylighting performance. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021 Jun 5:102832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102832 [Article] [DOI]
57. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zhang G, Vali K. Influence of permeability ratio on wind-driven ventilation and cooling load of mid-rise buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Jul 1;70:102894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102894 [Article] [DOI]
58. Rasoolzadeh M, Moshari M. Prioritizing for Healthy Urban Planning: Interaction of Modern Chemistry and Green Material-based Computation. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 May 10;11(1):94-105. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.1.7.0
59. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Markazi A.H.D., Bemanian M. Architectural layout design through deep learning and agent-based modeling: A hybrid approach. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 April15; 47, 103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103822 [Article] [DOI]
60. Pilechiha P, Mahdavinejad M, Rahimian FP, Carnemolla P, Seyedzadeh S. Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency. Applied Energy. 2020 Mar 1; 261: 114356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356 [Article] [DOI]
61. Hanachi P, Mollazadeh F, FadaeiNezhadBahramjerdi S. Developing the conceptual framework of value-based management in cultural and historical places; (Looking at the Islamic Culture). Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2017 Dec 10;7(3):1-14. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1396.7.3.4.3 [Article] [DOI]
62. Hanachi P, Taymourtash S. Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage, A model for creating new opportunities in cities. DANESH-e-HEFAZAT va MAREMMAT. 2017 Oct 10;1(2):21-33. [Persian] Available from: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-35-en.html [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.