Volume 13, Issue 2 (2023)                   Naqshejahan 2023, 13(2): 104-124 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

shirzadnia Z, Zarkesh A. Redesign of industrial heritage building with the approach of optimizing daylight efficiency and visual comfort. Naqshejahan 2023; 13 (2) : 6
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-67117-en.html
1- Master of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , zarkesh@modares.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1108 Views)
Aims: Reuse of heritage buildings is the best strategy to preserve the building. The lack of attention to industrial heritage buildings compared to other heritage buildings has caused their destruction, while due to its huge scale, it can be used appropriately. In addition, these buildings usually do not provide daylight standards for health and productivity. The main goal is to analyze the current state of the daylight and find solutions to reduce glare and optimal use of daylight instead of artificial light.

Methods:The case study is the research on the building of the old steam boiler in the Ghaemshahr textile factory complex in Mazandaran province. Building modeling is done with Rhino and Grasshopper, and daylight is simulated in Honeybee and Ladybug plugins based on Radiance. The design parameters of the shading system for horizontal and vertical louvres have been examined in order of the width of the blades, the distance between them and the angle, and the width has been considered for the frame. These parameters are examined by manual optimization method. With scrutinizing and validation, it leads to a better selection of shading system for better productivity.

Findings: With the aid of shading systems, it is possible to reduce glare and have enough daylight in the space. Among the shadings, the vertical louvre reports the greatest effect in reducing glare.

Conclusion: The result is presented as a design guideline for industrial heritage buildings in a humid subtropical climate so that the building can be reused with minimal intervention.
 
Article number: 6
Full-Text [PDF 1653 kb]   (813 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2023/01/28 | Accepted: 2023/05/28 | Published: 2023/06/22

References
1. Bottero M, D’Alpaos C, Oppio A. Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):785. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030785 [Article] [DOI]
2. Yazdani Mehr S. Analysis of 19th and 20th century conservation key theories in relation to contemporary adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Heritage. 2019;2(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010061 [Article] [DOI]
3. Royal Australian Institute of Architects., Australia. Department of the Environment and Heritage. Adaptive reuse : preserving our past, building our future. 2004;16. Available at https://www.dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/heritage/publications/adaptive-reuse [Article]
4. Mısırlısoy D, Günçe K. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustain cities Soc. 2016;26:91–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017 [Article] [DOI]
5. Todorović MS, Ećim-Crossed D Signurić O, Nikolić S, Ristić S, Polić-Radovanović S. Historic building’s holistic and sustainable deep energy refurbishment via BPS, energy efficiency and renewable energy - A case study. Vol. 95, Energy and Buildings. 2015. p. 130–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.011 [Article] [DOI]
6. Galatioto A, Ciulla G, Ricciu R. An overview of energy retrofit actions feasibility on Italian historical buildings. Energy. 2017;137:991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.103 [Article] [DOI]
7. Rani Prihatmanti Azizi Bahauddin a. WHAT WILL HAPPEN AFTER THE ADAPTIVE REUSING THE BUILDING? AN ASSESSMENT OF INDOOR VISUAL COMFORT OF HERITAGE OFFICE BUILDINGS. Int Trans J Eng Manag Appl Sci Technol [Internet]. 2019;10(No.19). http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i3.2443 [Article] [DOI]
8. Lo Faro A, Nocera F. Daylighting design for refurbishment of built heritage: a case study. InSustainability in Energy and Buildings 2021 2022 (pp. 341-351). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6269-0 [Article] [DOI]
9. Troi A, Bastian Z. Energy Efficiency solutions for historic buildings: a handbook. Birkhäuser; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038216506 [Article] [DOI]
10. Pellegrino A, Cammarano S, Savio V. Daylighting for Green schools: A resource for indoor quality and energy efficiency in educational environments. Energy Procedia. 2015 Nov 1;78:3162-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.774 [Article] [DOI]
11. Yu X, Su Y. Daylight availability assessment and its potential energy saving estimation–A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015 Dec 1;52:494-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.142 [Article] [DOI]
12. ASHRAE 100-2018 Standard 100-2018 -- Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings (ANSI Approved/IES Co-sponsored) [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.ashrae.org/technology [Article]
13. El-Abd W, Kamel B, Afify M, Dorra M. Assessment of skylight design configurations on daylighting performance in shopping malls: A case study. Solar Energy. 2018 Aug 1;170:358-68. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.052 [Article] [DOI]
14. Stojković M, Pucar M, Krstić-Furundžić A. Daylight performance of adapted industrial buildings. Facta universitatis-series: Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2016;14(1):59-74. 10.2298/FUACE1601059S [Article] [DOI]
15. Acosta I, Varela C, Molina JF, Navarro J, Sendra JJ. Energy efficiency and lighting design in courtyards and atriums: A predictive method for daylight factors. Applied energy. 2018 Feb 1;211:1216-28. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261917317051 [Article] [DOI]
16. Bakmohammadi P, Noorzai E. Optimization of the design of the primary school classrooms in terms of energy and daylight performance considering occupants’ thermal and visual comfort. Energy Reports. 2020 Nov 1;6:1590-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.008 [Article] [DOI]
17. Talip MS, Shaari MF, Ahmad SS, Sanchez RB. Optimising Daylighting Performance in Tropical Courtyard and Atrium Buildings for Occupants’ Wellbeing. Environ Proc J. 2021;6(16):93–102. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v6i16.2710 [Article] [DOI]
18. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Larsen OK, Zhang C, Zarkesh A, Asadi S. Evaluating the different boundary conditions to simulate airflow and heat transfer in Double-Skin Facade. In Building Simulation 2022 May;15(5):799-815. Tsinghua University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0824-5 [Article] [DOI]
19. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Kalyanova Larsen O, Zhang C., Asadi S. Naturally Ventilated Folded Double-Skin Façade (DSF) for PV Integration-Geometry Evaluation via Thermal Performance Investigation. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (2023): 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102136 [Article] [DOI]
20. Kaya SM, Afacan Y. Effects of daylight design features on visitors’ satisfaction of museums. Indoor Built Environ. 2018;27(10):1341–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X17704028 [Article] [DOI]
21. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Larsen OK, Zhang C, Asadi S. Naturally ventilated folded double-skin façade (DSF) for PV integration-Geometry evaluation via thermal performance investigation. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2023 Oct 1;45:102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102136 [Article] [DOI]
22. Al-Sallal KA, AbouElhamd AR, Dalmouk MB. UAE heritage buildings converted into museums: Evaluation of daylighting effectiveness and potential risks on artifacts and visual comfort. Energy and Buildings. 2018 Oct 1;176:333-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.067 [Article] [DOI]
23. Wilson M. Lighting in museums: Lighting interventions during the European demonstration project ‘Energy efficiency and sustainability in retrofitted and new museum buildings’(NNES-1999-20). Int J Sustain Energy. 2006;25(3–4):153–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786450600921546 [Article] [DOI]
24. Maria YS, Prihatmanti R. Daylight characterisation of classrooms in heritage school buildings. Planning Malaysia. 2017 May 12;15. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.236 [Article] [DOI]
25. Nocera F, Lo Faro A, Costanzo V, Raciti C. Daylight performance of classrooms in a mediterranean school heritage building. Sustainability. 2018;10(10):3705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103705 [Article] [DOI]
26. Eltaweel A, Su Y. Controlling venetian blinds based on parametric design; via implementing Grasshopper’s plugins: A case study of an office building in Cairo. Energy and Buildings. 2017 Mar 15;139:31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.075 [Article] [DOI]
27. Aliabadi M, Zarkesh A, Mahdavinejad M. Bioware fog collectors: the Texas horned lizard as a model for a biomimetic fog-harvesting. Materials Research Express. 2018 Sep 5;5(11):115502. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aadab4 [Article] [DOI]
28. Alilou M, Mahdavinejad M. The Effect of CCT on Vitality and Population Absorption in Urban Area: Case Study of the Safavi Bridge Urban Area in Karaj, Iran. Light & Engineering (Svetotekhnika), Moscow. 2022 Sep 1;30(5): 81-91. Available at: https://l-e-journal.com/en/journals/light-engineering-30-5/light-engineering-30-5-2022-paper-version/ [Article]
29. Kharvari F. An empirical validation of daylighting tools: Assessing radiance parameters and simulation settings in Ladybug and Honeybee against field measurements. Sol Energy. 2020;207:1021–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.054 [Article] [DOI]
30. Pompei L, Spiridigliozzi G, de Santoli L, Cornaro C, Bisegna F. Testing the BIM-ladybug tools interoperability: A daylighting simulation workflow. Build Simul Appl BSA. 2020;2020:149–56. Available at: https://art.torvergata.it/handle/2108/256069 [Article]
31. Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M. A novel approach to multi-apertures and multi-aspects ratio light pipe. J Daylighting. 2020;7(2):186–200. available online at https://solarlits.com/jd/7-186 [Article] [DOI]
32. Bazazzadeh H, Świt-Jankowska B, Fazeli N, Nadolny A, Safar Ali Najar B, Hashemi Safaei S, Mahdavinejad M. Efficient Shading Device as an Important Part of Daylightophil Architecture; a Designerly Framework of High-Performance Architecture for an Office Building in Tehran. Energies. 2021 December 8;14(24), 8272. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248272 [Article] [DOI]
33. Ghasri M, Maghrebi M, Rashidi TH, Waller ST. Hazard-based model for concrete pouring duration using construction site and supply chain parameters. Autom Constr. 2016;71:283–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.012
34. Diba D. Contemporary architecture of Iran. Architectural Design. 2012 May;82(3):70-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1406 [Article] [DOI]
35. Yi YK. Building facade multi-objective optimization for daylight and aesthetical perception. Build Environ. 2019;156:178–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.002 [Article] [DOI]
36. Zhao J, Du Y. Multi-objective optimization design for windows and shading configuration considering energy consumption and thermal comfort: A case study for office building in different climatic regions of China. Sol Energy. 2020;206:997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.090 [Article] [DOI]
37. Kim H-J, Yang C-S, Moon HJ. A study on multi-objective parametric design tool for surround-type movable shading device. Sustainability. 2019;11(24):7096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247096 [Article] [DOI]
38. Manzan M, Clarich A. FAST energy and daylight optimization of an office with fixed and movable shading devices. Build Environ. 2017;113:175–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.035 [Article] [DOI]
39. Xue Y, Liu W. A Study on Parametric Design Method for Optimization of Daylight in Commercial Building’s Atrium in Cold Regions. Sustainability. 2022;14(13):7667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137667 [Article] [DOI]
40. Eslamirad N, Kolbadinejad SM, Mahdavinejad M, Mehranrad M. Thermal comfort prediction by applying supervised machine learning in green sidewalks of Tehran. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 2020 Apr 28; 9(4):361-374. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2019-0028 [Article] [DOI]
41. Carlucci S, Causone F, De Rosa F, Pagliano L. A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design. Renew Sustain energy Rev. 2015;47:1016–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.062 [Article] [DOI]
42. Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy Build. 2001;33(7):683–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5 [Article] [DOI]
43. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Window geometry impact on a room's wind comfort. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2021 Mar 24;28(9):2381-2410. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0075 [Article] [DOI]
44. Dangol R, Islam MS, Hyvärinen M, Bhushal P, Puolakka M, Halonen L. User acceptance studies for LED office lighting: Preference, naturalness and colourfulness. Light Res Technol. 2015;47(1):36–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153513514424 [Article] [DOI]
45. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2015 Nov 2; 9(4): 593-618. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-09-2014-0001 [Article] [DOI]
46. Olbina S, Beliveau Y. Developing a transparent shading device as a daylighting system. Build Res Inf. 2009;37(2):148–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210902723738 [Article] [DOI]
47. Shirzadnia Z, Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M. Designerly approach to skylight configuration based on daylight performance; Toward a novel optimization process. Energy Build. 2023;112970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112970 [Article] [DOI]
48. Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos. 2006;3(1):7–31. https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01.001 [Article] [DOI]
49. Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Daneshjoo K. Designerly optimization of devices (as reflectors) to improve daylight and scrutiny of the light-well’s configuration. In: Building Simulation. Springer; 2022. p. 933–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0839-y [Article] [DOI]
50. Goia F. Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential. Sol Energy. 2016;132:467–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.031 [Article] [DOI]
51. Gharaati F, Mahdavinejad M, Nadolny A, Bazazzadeh H. Sustainable Assessment of Built Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practice: Iranian Industrial Heritage in the Light of International Charters. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice. 2023 Oct 4:1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2023.2261328 [Article] [DOI]
52. Goharian A, Daneshjoo K, Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Yeganeh M. A designerly approach to daylight efficiency of central light-well; combining manual with NSGA-II algorithm optimization. Energy. 2023 Apr 17:127402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127402 [Article] [DOI]
53. Hirning MB, Isoardi GL, Coyne S, Hansen VRG, Cowling I. Post occupancy evaluations relating to discomfort glare: A study of green buildings in Brisbane. Build Environ. 2013;59:349–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.08.032 [Article] [DOI]
54. Hadianpour M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Haghshenas M, Kordjamshidi M. Effects of windward and leeward wind directions on outdoor thermal and wind sensation in Tehran. Building and Environment. 2019 Mar 1;150:164-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.053 [Article] [DOI]
55. Deroisy B, Deneyer A. A new standard for daylight: Towards a daylight revolution. Light Mod Soc Proc Lux Eur. 2017;2017:340–3. availavle online at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bertrand-Deroisy/publication/319980878_A_new_standard_for_daylight_Towards_a_daylight_revolution/links/59c4ee47aca272c71bb8a324/A-new-standard-for-daylight-Towards-a-daylight-revolution.pdf
56. Hadianpour M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Nasrollahi F. Seasonal differences of subjective thermal sensation and neutral temperature in an outdoor shaded space in Tehran, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018 May 1; 39: 751-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.003 [Article] [DOI]
57. Haghshenas M, Hadianpour M, Matzarakis A, Mahdavinejad M, Ansari M. Improving the suitability of selected thermal indices for predicting outdoor thermal sensation in Tehran. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Jul 27:103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103205 [Article] [DOI]
58. Heidari F, Mahdavinejad M, Werner LC, Roohabadi M, Sarmadi H. Biocomputational Architecture Based on Particle Physics. Front. Energy Res. 2021 July 08;9:620127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.620127 [Article] [DOI]
59. Heidarzadeh S, Mahdavinejad M, Habib F. External shading and its effect on the energy efficiency of Tehran's office buildings. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2023 May 17:e14185. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14185 [Article] [DOI]
60. Javanroodi K, Mahdavinejad M, Nik VM. Impacts of urban morphology on reducing cooling load and increasing ventilation potential in hot-arid climate. Applied Energy. 2018; 231: 714-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.116 [Article] [DOI]
61. Javanroodi K, Nik VM, Mahdavinejad M. A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 49:101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101597 [Article] [DOI]
62. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. E&ES. 2017 Aug;83(1): 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012020 [Article] [DOI]
63. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2019 Feb 1;43(1):71-90. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.5209 [Article] [DOI]
64. Costanzo V, Evola G, Marletta L, Pistone Nascone F. Application of climate based daylight modelling to the refurbishment of a school building in Sicily. Sustainability. 2018;10(8):2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082653 [Article] [DOI]
65. Mahdavinejad M, Javanroodi K. Natural ventilation performance of ancient wind catchers, an experimental and analytical study–case studies: one-sided, two-sided and four-sided wind catchers. International journal of energy technology and policy, 2014 Jan 1;10(1):36-60. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2014.065036 [Article] [DOI]
66. Mahdavinejad M, Bazazzadeh H, Mehrvarz F, Berardi U, Nasr T, Pourbagher S, Hoseinzadeh S. The impact of facade geometry on visual comfort and energy consumption in an office building in different climates. Energy Reports. 2024 Jun 1;11:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.11.021 [Article] [DOI]
67. Nikoudel F, Mahdavinejad M, Vazifehdan J. Nocturnal Architecture of Buildings: Interaction of Exterior Lighting and Visual Beauty. Light & Engineering, 2018 Jan 1; 26(1): 81-90. https://doi.org/10.33383/2016-008 [Article] [DOI]
68. Wienold J, Christoffersen J. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build. 2006;38(7):743–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017 [Article] [DOI]
69. Pakdehi, S. G., & Rasoolzadeh, M. Comparison of Catalytic Behavior of Iridium and Nickel Nanocatalysts for Decomposition of Hydrazine. Procedia Materials Science. 2015;11, 749-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.071 [Article] [DOI]
70. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Markazi A.H.D., Bemanian M. Architectural layout design through deep learning and agent-based modeling: A hybrid approach. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 April15; 47, 103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103822 [Article] [DOI]
71. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zhang G, Vali K. Influence of permeability ratio on wind-driven ventilation and cooling load of mid-rise buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Jul 1;70:102894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102894 [Article] [DOI]
72. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zhang G. A study on terraced apartments and their natural ventilation performance in hot and humid regions. Building Simulation. 2018 Apr 1;11(2):359-372. Tsinghua University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0407-7 [Article] [DOI]
73. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Zalooli A. Physico-mechanical and Chemical Properties of Coquina Stone Used as Heritage Building Stone in Bushehr, Iran. Geoheritage. 2022 Sep;14(3):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00738-0 [Article] [DOI]
74. LM I. Approved method: IES spatial Daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illum Eng Soc https//www ies org/product/ies-spatial-daylight-autonomy-sda-and-annual-sunlight-exposure-ase. 2013. Available at: https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/IESNA/preview_IES+LM-83-12.pdf [Article]
75. Sarmadi H, Mahdavinejad M. A designerly approach to Algae-based large open office curtain wall Façades to integrated visual comfort and daylight efficiency. Solar Energy. 2023 Feb 1;251:350-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.01.021 [Article] [DOI]
76. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M. Prediction Indoor Thermal Comfort in Traditional Houses of Shiraz with PMV/PPD model. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2022 Dec 31;43(1):8316-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2092774 [Article] [DOI]
77. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Pourghasemian MH. A new design to create natural ventilation in buildings: Wind chimney. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 Aug 22:105041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105041 [Article] [DOI]
78. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Vakilinejad R, Bazazzadeh H, Monfared M. Effects of sea-breeze natural ventilation on thermal comfort in low-rise buildings with diverse atrium roof shapes in BWh regions. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2023 Jan 1;41:102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102638 [Article] [DOI]
79. Taban M, Pourjafar M, Bemanian M, Heidari S. Climate Impact on Architectural Ornament Analyzing the Shadow of Khavoons in Dezful Historical Context with the Use of Image Processing. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2012 Oct 10;2(2):79-90. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1391.2.2.1.3 [Article]
80. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Prieto A, Sangin H. Multi-objective optimization of building-integrated microalgae photobioreactors for energy and daylighting performance. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021 Jun 5:102832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102832 [Article] [DOI]
81. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Haghighi HM, Atashdast A. Thermal and energy performance of a user-responsive microalgae bioreactive façade for climate adaptability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022 Aug 1;52:101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101894 [Article] [DOI]
82. Torabi M, Mahdavinejad M. Past and Future Trends on the Effects of Occupant Behaviour on Building Energy Consumption. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2021 Oct 27;29(2) 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.29.2.28576 [Article] [DOI]
83. Valitabar M. Mohammadjavad M. Henry S. Peiman P. A dynamic vertical shading optimisation to improve view, visual comfort and operational energy. Open House International. 2021 Jul 9;46(3):401-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0031 [Article] [DOI]
84. Zafarmandi S, Mahdavinejad M, Norford L, Matzarakis A. Analyzing Thermal Comfort Sensations in Semi-Outdoor Space on a University Campus: On-Site Measurements in Tehran’s Hot and Cold Seasons. Atmosphere. 2022 June 22;13, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071034 [Article] [DOI]
85. Zarghami E, Fatourehchi D. Architectural impacts of traditional houses as an Iranian-Islamic Cultural Identity on Iranians Mental Health Outcomes. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2018 Mar 10;7(4):30-46. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1396.7.4.6.7 [Article] [DOI]
86. Mansourimajoumerd P, Bazazzadeh H, Mahdavinejad M, Nia SN. Energy Efficiency and Building's Envelope: An Integrated Approach to High-Performance Architecture. Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development (UPADSD 2021). Florence, Italy, 14, Sep / 16, Sep 2021; Pp. 122-123. Available at: https://flore.unifi.it/bitstream/2158/1259071/6/UPADSD%202021_ATTI_Firenze.pdf#page=133 [Article]
87. Mansourimajoumerd P, Mahdavinejad M, Niknia S, Shirvani M. Comprehensive Strategies for Optimization e_Energy System in Different Climate Zone. InThe 4th International Conference on Architecture, Arts and Applications www.iconfaaa.com 2020 Oct 12. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3709733 [Article]
88. Savvides A, Michael A, Vassiliades C, Parpa D, Triantafyllidou E, Englezou M. An examination of the design for a prefabricated housing unit in Cyprus in terms of energy, daylighting and cost. Scientific Reports. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12611. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38045-5 [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.