Volume 10, Issue 4 (2021)
Naqshejahan 2021, 10(4): 295-303 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
ُSedighi R, Panahi S, Foroutan M, Dibadj S. Effective Factors in Interpretation or Reading the Islamic Architectural Based on Transcendent Wisdom. Naqshejahan 2021; 10 (4) :295-303
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-42566-en.html
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-42566-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Abhar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran ,Siamak_architecture@yahoo.com
3- Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
4- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Abhar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran ,
3- Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
4- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2468 Views)
Aims: This study presents the factors influencing the interpretation or reading of Islamic architecture based on transcendent wisdom. The existence cognition of the human living environment allows humans to discover the universe again as definite integrity of the essence of existence. Since the foundation of transcendent wisdom is the science of existence, it helps to read architecture based on transcendent wisdom to find what makes eternity in architecture.
Methods: The research method is descriptive-analytical in a logical argument through a qualitative approach. The research frame was established on the intertextuality pillars such as beliefs, values, geography, and customs.
Finding: The research finding emphasizes the importance of effective factors in interpretation or reading the Islamic architectural based on transcendent wisdom to read Islamic architecture.
Conclusion: The process of this research has concluded that the architectural interpretation using Mulla Sadra's philosophy from the path of recognizing the architect, the fields of understanding and pre-perception of him is taken from the existential level of a human who is substance theory towards meridian in time essence and its relativity and in the instinctual, innate, and voluntary dimensions, influenced by the intertextuality of culture, which is possible in all its pillars (beliefs, values, geography, customs).
Methods: The research method is descriptive-analytical in a logical argument through a qualitative approach. The research frame was established on the intertextuality pillars such as beliefs, values, geography, and customs.
Finding: The research finding emphasizes the importance of effective factors in interpretation or reading the Islamic architectural based on transcendent wisdom to read Islamic architecture.
Conclusion: The process of this research has concluded that the architectural interpretation using Mulla Sadra's philosophy from the path of recognizing the architect, the fields of understanding and pre-perception of him is taken from the existential level of a human who is substance theory towards meridian in time essence and its relativity and in the instinctual, innate, and voluntary dimensions, influenced by the intertextuality of culture, which is possible in all its pillars (beliefs, values, geography, customs).
Keywords: Persian Architecture, Transcendent Wisdom, Existence Cognition, Architectural Design, Intertextuality
Article Type: Analytic Review |
Subject:
Pioneer Islamic Iranian Art and Architecture
Received: 2020/05/30 | Accepted: 2020/11/11 | Published: 2020/12/31
Received: 2020/05/30 | Accepted: 2020/11/11 | Published: 2020/12/31
References
1. Norberg-Schulz C. Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture (1979). In: Cody J, Siravo F, editors. Historic cities: Issues in urban conservation. 8th Volume. Unknown City: Getty Publications; 2019. [Link]
2. Diba D. Contemporary architecture of Iran. Archit Des. 2012;82(3):70-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ad.1406]
3. Mahdavinejad M. Education of architectural criticism. HONAR‐HA‐YE‐ZIBA. 2005;23(23):69‐76. [Persian] [Link]
4. Mahdavinejad M. Discourse of high-performance architecture: A method to understand contemporary architecture. HOVIAT-E SHAHR. 2017;11(2):53-67. [Persian] [Link]
5. Farshid Nik F, Afhami R, Ansari M, Nabavi L. The role of dynamic equilibrium in the continuous perception of in Iranian Islamic urbanism. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2016;5(3):30-40. [Persian] [Link]
6. Amini M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Future of interactive architecture in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities in case of Tehran. J Constr Dev Ctries. 2019;24(1):163-84. [Link] [DOI:10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.9]
7. Mahdavinejad M. Islamic art, challenges with new horizons and contemporary beliefs. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA. 2003;12(2):23-32. [Persian] [Link]
8. Mahdavinejad M. Wisdom of Islamic architecture: Recognition of Iranian Islamic architecture principles. HONAR‐HA‐YE‐ZIBA. 2004;19(19):66‐57. [Persian] [Link]
9. Pourjafar M, Akbarian R, Ansari M, Pourmand H. Conceptual approach in Persian architecture. SOFFEH. 2008;16(3-4):90-105. [Persian] [Link]
10. Noghrekar A, Raeisi MM. Realization of Islamic identity in architectural works. SHAHR-E IRANI ESLAMI. 2012;(7):5-12. [Persian] [Link]
11. Latifi M, Diba D. Data mining of the spatial structure of Qajar native housing; Case study: Jangjouyan House of Isfahan. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2020;10(3):163-71. [Persian] [Link]
12. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977-2017). J Archit Urban. 2019;43(1):71. [Link] [DOI:10.3846/jau.2019.5209]
13. Bolouhari S, Barbera L, Etessam I. Learning traditional architecture for future energy-efficient architecture in the country; Case study: Yazd city. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2020;10(2):85-93. [Persian] [Link]
14. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Larki AN, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2014;3(2):235-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.003]
15. Mahdavinejad M. Designerly approach to energy efficiency in high-performance architecture theory. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2020;10(2):75-83. [Persian] [Link]
16. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. Int J Energ Sect Manag. 2015;9(4):593-618. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/IJESM-09-2014-0001]
17. Haghighatbin M, Ansari M, Zabihian S. Howard's and Safavid's garden cities' principles (a comparative study). NAQSHEJAHAN. 2012;2(1):67-78. [Persian] [Link]
18. Latifie M, Daneshjoo K. The creation of an architectural work within the creation of the universe regarding the Holy Quran. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2016;6(2):5-15. [Persian] [Link]
19. Pourjafar M, Moradi A. Explaining design dimensions of ecological greenways. Op J Ecol. 2015;5(3):54537. [Link] [DOI:10.4236/oje.2015.53007]
20. Taban M, Pourjafar M, Bemanian M, Heidari S. Climate impact on architectural ornament analyzing the shadow of Khavoons in Dezful historical context with the use of image processing. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2012;2(2):79-90. [Persian] [Link]
21. Pourjafar M, Mahmoudinejad H, Ahadian O. Design with nature in bio-architecture with emphasis on the hidden rules of natural organism. Int J Appl Sci Technol. 2011;1(4):74-83. [Link]
22. Faghfoori R. Wisdom of Islamic architecture, a deep analysis to structure and contents of luster altar of Razavi Holy Shrine. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2014;4(1):7-15. [Persian] [Link]
23. Nikkhaah-Ghamsari N, Kazemin-Araani F. A reflection on methodology in humanities. ASRA HIKMAT. 2012;4(4):155-83. [Persian] [Link]
24. Mosavi Gilani S. Surveying and criticizing the viewpoint of traditionalists on Islamic art. Theol Art. 2014;2014:(2014):46-64. [Persian] [Link]
25. Jafari A, Abdi H. Criticism of critical realism based on new Sadra's realism. Interdisciplinary Q Fundam Res Human. 2017;3(1):51-72. [Persian] [Link]
26. Amoorezaei F. Analyzing the position of mystical intuition, imagination and reason in Mola Sadra and Ibn Arabi theosophy. Int J Multic Multirelig Underst. 2020;7(3):143-55. [Link] [DOI:10.18415/ijmmu.v7i3.1411]
27. Zareh Neyestanak M. The Relationship between creativity and social intelligence in students at Allameh Tabatabai and Shahid Beheshti Universities. Mil Caring Sci. 2019;6(1):61-8.[Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/mcs.6.1.61]
28. Hassanzadeh H. The ontology of truthfulness from the perspective of Professor Javadi Amoli. Res Q Islam Eth. 2019;12(45):55-68. [Persian] [Link]
29. Soltaninejad N, Keshtiaray N, Vaezi SH. Explanation of educational and cultural dimensions of globalization in the views of Ayatollah Javadi-Amoli. Int Educ Stud. 2017;10(1):172-8. [Link] [DOI:10.5539/ies.v10n1p172]
30. Einifar A, Khademzade M. Recognition of the architecture of Yazd in Atabakan period, using historical documents (Case study: Atabak Qotb-Al'Din's Dowlat-Khaneh complex). J Archit Urban Plann. 2011;3(6):123-38. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |