Volume 10, Issue 3 (2020)
Naqshejahan 2020, 10(3): 231-238 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
pourzargar M, Abedini H. Reading the Hidden Geometry in the Historic City and the Impact of Modern Evolution on It; Case Study: Sabzeh-Meydan, Tehran. Naqshejahan 2020; 10 (3) :231-238
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-43327-en.html
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-43327-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran , reza_pourzargar@yahoo.com
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (4479 Views)
Aims: The forming elements result in the shape of the city during the history and according to the requirements of their dweller have followed a lawful and completely intangible geometry that, in their unorganized appearance, can interact and strike a balance among government, nation, and religion. The present study seeks to read and analyze the hidden geometry in the form of the city in the historical past that facilitates the connection between social pillars of the city.
Instruments & Methods: The method of this study is based on a qualitative approach of the historical-analytic type. By studying in the libraries and documents, this study has analyzed the hidden system of traditional city and the impact of modern development on it. In the case study of Sabze-Meydan, reading the hidden geometry is based on three heads of state, nation, and religion.
Findings: Hidden geometry in historic cities is a spirit that dominated the inner layers of the city and, with a systematic structure in functional and perceptual aspects, regulates the religious, political, and social relations of its inhabitants. With the advent of modernity and its fundamental transformations, the city of Tehran has been transformed. The proportions of the hidden and organic geometry in the Sabze-Meydan complex are transformed into euclidean geometry with perpendicular streets, and its balance is disturbed.
Conclusion: The geometric system contained in a city expresses the identity and civilization in it. The regular geometry of the modern city contrasts with the inner authenticity of the historical areas. Hence, the study of the hidden geometry of historical zones requires the adoption of an appropriate intervention approach in the city’s historical and charismatic tissues, through which historical authenticity can be restored.
Instruments & Methods: The method of this study is based on a qualitative approach of the historical-analytic type. By studying in the libraries and documents, this study has analyzed the hidden system of traditional city and the impact of modern development on it. In the case study of Sabze-Meydan, reading the hidden geometry is based on three heads of state, nation, and religion.
Findings: Hidden geometry in historic cities is a spirit that dominated the inner layers of the city and, with a systematic structure in functional and perceptual aspects, regulates the religious, political, and social relations of its inhabitants. With the advent of modernity and its fundamental transformations, the city of Tehran has been transformed. The proportions of the hidden and organic geometry in the Sabze-Meydan complex are transformed into euclidean geometry with perpendicular streets, and its balance is disturbed.
Conclusion: The geometric system contained in a city expresses the identity and civilization in it. The regular geometry of the modern city contrasts with the inner authenticity of the historical areas. Hence, the study of the hidden geometry of historical zones requires the adoption of an appropriate intervention approach in the city’s historical and charismatic tissues, through which historical authenticity can be restored.
Keywords: Hidden Geometry, Sabze-Meydan, State-Nation-Religion Triangle, Chequered Street, Historic City
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2020/06/1 | Accepted: 2020/07/25 | Published: 2020/10/21
Received: 2020/06/1 | Accepted: 2020/07/25 | Published: 2020/10/21
References
1. Daneshjoo Kh, Farmahin Farahani S. Geometry in pre-islamic Iranian architecture and its manifestation in contemporary iranian architecture. Naqshejahan. 2013;3(1):55-66. [Persian] [Link]
2. Kasraei MH, Nourian Y, Mahdavinejad M. Girih for domes: Analysis of three Iranian domes. Nexus Netw J. 2016;18:311-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00004-015-0282-4]
3. Mahdavinejad M. Wisdom of Islamic architecture: Recognition of Iranian Islamic architecture principles. HONAR‐HA‐YE‐ZIBA. 2004;19:66‐57. [Persian] [Link]
4. Okhovat H, Almasifar N, Bemanian MR. A research on historical and cultural buildings in Iranian vernacular architecture. ACE: Archit, City Environ. 2011;17:37-58. [Link]
5. Mazaherian H, Keynoosh A, Keynoosh A. Endogenous versus conventional approach to residential development in revitalize urban identity of Iranian Islamic architecture. Naqshejahan. 2017;7(1):1-12. [Persian] [Link]
6. Mansouri B, Hanaei Gh, Diba D, Dabbagh AM. Influence of the safavid period on social issues and public space in Esfahan (Case study: Allahverdi Khan and Khaju Bridges). Naqshejahan. 2020;10(1):1-9. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ahmadpour N, Pourjafar M, Mahdavinejad M, Yousefian S. The role and impact of design elements on the quality of thermal comfort in urban open spaces, Case study: Design of pedestrian way in tamghachiha pathway in the city of Kashan. J Archit Urb Plan. 2017;9(18):59-80. [Persian] [Link]
8. Mahdavinejad M. Education of architectural criticism. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA. 2005;23:69-76. [Persian] [Link]
9. Mahdavinejad M. Creativity and innovative educational process in architectural design. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA. 2005;21:57-66. [Persian] [Link]
10. Mohtashami N, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Contribution of city prosperity to decisions on healthy building design: A case study of Tehran. Frontiers Archit Res. 2016;5(3):319-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2016.06.001]
11. Haghighatbin M, Ansari M. Persian garden's symbolism during Islamic period and its relation to religious believes. Naqshejahan. 2014;4(1):47-55. [Persian] [Link]
12. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Nourouzi Larki A, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. Int J Sustainable Built Environ. 2014;3(2):235-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.003]
13. Mahdavinejad M. Dilemma of prosperity and technology in contemporary architecture of developing countries. Naqshejahan. 2014;4(2):36-46. [Persian] [Link]
14. Kiaei E, Baba Abbasi M. Studying the principles and rules governing the urban structure of Islamic cities in order for achieving and creation of an Islamic-Iranian utopia. Naqshejahan. 2015;5(1):59-74. [Persian] [Link]
15. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. Int J Energy Sect Manag. 2015;9(4):593-618. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/IJESM-09-2014-0001]
16. Taban M, Pourjafar M, Bemanian M, Heidari S. Climate impact on architectural ornament analyzing the shadow of Khavoons in dezful historical context with the use of image processing. Naqshejahan. 2012;2(2):79-90. [Persian] [Link]
17. Bolouhari S, Barbera LL, Etessam I. Learning Traditional architecture for future energy-efficient architecture in the country; Case study: Yazd city. Naqshejahan. 2020;10(2):85-93. [Persian] [Link]
18. Pourzargar M, Abedini H. Explaining the components of contemporization and quality improvement of Emamzadeh Saleh's (AS) adjacent texture. Naqshejahan. 2020;10(1):63-74. [Persian] [Link]
19. Pourjafar M, Nazhad Ebrahimi A, Ansari M. Effective factors in structural development of Iranian historical bazaars case study: Tabriz Bazaar. J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2013;3(2):272-82. [Link]
20. Pourjafar M, Amini M, Varzaneh EH, Mahdavinejad M. Role of Bazaars as a unifying factor in traditional cities of Iran: The Isfahan Bazaar. Front Archit Res. 2014;3(1):10-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2013.11.001]
21. Diba D. Contemporary architecture of Iran. Archit Des. 2012;82(3):70-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ad.1406]
22. Mahdavinejad M. High-performance architecture: Search for future legacy in contemporary Iranian architecture. Armanshahr Archit Urb Dev 2017;9(17):129-38. [Persian] [Link]
23. Mahdavinejad M. Discourse of high-performance architecture: A method to understand contemporary architecture. Hoviatshahr, 2017;11(2):59-68. [Persian] [Link]
24. Pourzargar MR. Regeneration and restoration of old texture with a perspective to protect the identity of housing, case study- Joybareh locality in Isfahan. Bagh-E Nazar. 2016;12(37):42-51. [Persian] [Link]
25. Münster S, Niebling F, Bruschke J, Barthel K, Friedrichs K, Kröber C, et al. Digital Cultural Heritage. New York: Springer; 2020. pp: 63-84. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15200-0_5]
26. Cuneo P. History of urbanism in the Islamic world. Tizghalam Zenozi S, translator. Tehran: Urban Development and Improvement Organization; 2005. [Persian] [Link]
27. Rabaça A. Le corbusier, the city, and the modern utopia of dwelling. J Archit Urb. 2016;40(2):110-20. [Link] [DOI:10.3846/20297955.2016.1183529]
28. Haddad E. Charles jencks and the historiography of post-modernism. J Archit. 2009;14(4):493-510. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13602360902867434]
29. Takmil Homayun N. Tehran: The capital. Tehran: Cultural Research Bureau; 2019. [Persian] [Link]
30. Hanachi P, Diba D, Mahdavinejad M. Development and conservation in Iran. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA. 2008;32(32):51-60. [Persian] [Link]
31. Shirazian R. Atlas of old Tehran. Tehran: Dastan; 2015. [Persian] [Link]
32. Behzadfar M. The identity of city, case study: Tehran. Tehran: Shahre Tehran; 2013. [Persian] [Link]
33. Hooshman Shaban Abadei F, Valibeig N, Behzadfar M, Faizi M. Representation of Tehran arg square based on descriptive and visual documents. J Res Islamic Archit. 2020;7(3):39-54. [Persian] [Link]
34. Hourshid Sh. The Excavation at Arg Square. Tehran. J Athar. 2014;34(63):101-16. [Persian] [Link]
35. Behzadi MR. Tehran which exists. Tehran: Rowzaneh; 2018. [Persian] [Link]
36. Flandin ON. Travel to Iran. Agahi A, translator. Isfahan: Naghsh-E-Mana; 2014. [Persian] [Link]
37. Mahdavinejad MJ. Contemporary identical indices of greater city of Tehran. Tehran: Tehran City Beautification Organization; 2014. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |