Volume 11, Issue 4 (2022)                   Naqshejahan 2022, 11(4): 25-43 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soroush H, Afghani Khoraskani R, Hafezi M, Aliakbarlou H. Utilizing of Structural Topology Optimization Method to Achieve Form in Architectural Design. Naqshejahan. 2022; 11 (4) :25-43
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-52920-en.html
1- MSc in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran , roham.afghani@polimi.it
3- Associate Professor of Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4- MSc in Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (298 Views)
Aims: Topology optimization is among contemporary approaches introduced to connect Architecture and Structural Engineering through simultaneous form-finding of the Architecture and Structural design. It is among various optimizations methods in structural engineering, which has been recently adopted in the architectural design process due to its direct effect on the overall form of the structure. This research aims to outline the potentials of this method within the realm of the design process as a framework.
Methods: Given that this research is performed using Finite Element modelling, at first, the theoretical framework of TO within FE software is described briefly and practically. Further on, different examples of the application of this method for architectural design is introduced, and the procedure of utilizing the method within architectural design process by use of related software and algorithms is described.
Findings: Throughout the Architectural design with TO, the effect of the initial design decisions on the resulting forms becomes somewhat unclear; for this purpose, morphology diagrams have been provided for cases similar to the design problem to facilitate the initial decision making of the designer at the initial stages of the design. Morphology diagrams, describing the effect of parameters related to boundary conditions for similar cases, make the design process transparent.
Conclusion: in this paper, a well-defined framework of the TO process and the required information to apply this method in the architectural design process are presented, and its application in the case study of an urban pedestrian bridge is described.
Full-Text [PDF 2362 kb]   (105 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Hightech in landscape design
Received: 2021/05/30 | Accepted: 2021/11/17 | Published: 2022/01/30

References
1. Johari M, Ahmadi Nadushan B, Reliability-based topology optimization of bridge structures using first and second order reliability methods. Journal of Structural Engineering and Construction. 2017 May 22; 4(1): 18-5. [Persian] https://doi.org/ 10.22065/JSCE.2016.40432 [Article] [DOI]
2. Sadeghian M, Hosseini A, Investigating the efficiency of evolutionary optimization methods in achieving architectural and construction objectives. 2020 Apr 14;45:17-34. [Persian] https://doi.org/ 10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.15714 [Article] [DOI]
3. Xie YM, Steven GP. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput. Struct. 1993 Dec 3; 49: 885-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949 (93)90035-C [Article] [DOI]
4. Xie YM, Steven GP. Optimal design of multiple load case structures using an evolutionary procedure. Computations. 1994 April 1;11:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644409410799290 [Article] [DOI]
5. Xie YM, Steven GP. A simple approach to structural frequency optimization. Comput. Struct. 1994 Dec 17; 53: 1487-1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949 (94)90414-6 [Article] [DOI]
6. Chu DN, Xie YM, Hira A, Steven GP. Evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 1996 April 1; 21(4):239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-874X (95)00043-S [Article] [DOI]
7. Tanskanen P. The evolutionary structural optimization method: theoretical aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2002 Nov 22; 191(47–48):5485–5498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825 (02)00464-4 [Article] [DOI]
8. Rian IM, Sassone M. Tree-inspired dendriforms and fractal-like branching structures in architecture: A brief historical overview. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2014 Sep 1;3(3):298-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.03.006 [Article] [DOI]
9. Stromberg LL, Beghini A, Baker WF, Paulino GH. Application of layout and topology optimization using pattern gradation for the conceptual design of buildings. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2011 Feb 1;43(2):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0563-1 [Article] [DOI]
10. Stromberg LL, Beghini A, Baker WF, Paulino GH. Topology optimization for braced frames: Combining continuum and beam/column elements. Engineering Structures. 2012 April 1; 37: 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.034 [Article] [DOI]
11. Briseghella B, Fenu L, Feng Y, Mazzarolo E, Zordan T. Topology optimization of bridges supported by a concrete shell. Structural Engineering International. 2013 Feb 9; 23(3):285-94. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13363929988214 [Article] [DOI]
12. Besserud K, Neil K, Alessandro B. Structural Emergence: Architectural and Structural Design Collaboration at SOM. Architectural Design. 2013; 83 (2):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1553 [Article] [DOI]
13. Sigmund, O., Maute, K. Topology optimization approaches. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2013 Aug 21; 48: 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6 [Article] [DOI]
14. Deaton, J.D., Grandhi, R.V. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: Post 2000. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2014 July 4; 49: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z [Article] [DOI]
15. Beghini LL, Beghini A, Katz N, Baker WF, Paulino GH. Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization. Engineering Structures. 2014 Feb 1; 59: 716–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.032 [Article] [DOI]
16. Aage N, Amir O, Clausen A, Hadar L, Maier D, Søndergaard A. Advanced topology optimization methods for conceptual architectural design. InAdvances in Architectural Geometry 2015 Jan 1: 159-179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11418-7_11 [Article] [DOI]
17. Dapogny C, Alexis F, Georgios M, Grégoire A, Agnes C, Rafael E. Geometric Constraints for Shape and Topology Optimization in Architectural Design. Computational Mechanics. 2017 Feb 13; 59 (6): 933–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1383-6 [Article] [DOI]
18. Zegard, T., Hartz, C., Mazurek, A. et al. Advancing building engineering through structural and topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2020 Jan 10; 62: 915–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02506-6 [Article] [DOI]
19. Kazakis G, Kanellopoulos I, Sotiropoulos S, Lagaros ND. Topology optimization aided structural design: Interpretation, computational aspects and 3D printing. Heliyon. 2017 Oct 1; 3(10): e00431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00431 [Article] [DOI]
20. Donofrio, M. Topology Optimization and Advanced Manufacturing as a Means for the Design of Sustainable Building Components. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 145: 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.054 [Article] [DOI]
21. Saadlaoui Y, Jean-Louis M, Jean-Marie R, Patrick C. Topology Optimization and Additive Manufacturing: Comparison of Conception Methods Using Industrial Codes. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2017 April 1; 43 (April): 178–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.006 [Article] [DOI]
22. Liu J, Gaynor AT, Chen S, Kang Z, Suresh K, Takezawa A, et al. Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2018 May 3; 57(6):2457–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3 [Article] [DOI]
23. Kontovourkis O, George T, Christos G. Robotic Additive Manufacturing (RAM) with Clay Using Topology Optimization Principles for Toolpath Planning: The Example of a Building Element. Architectural Science Review. 2019 Jun 2; 63: 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1620170 [Article] [DOI]
24. Meng L, Zhang W, Quan D, Shi G, Tang L, Hou Y, Breitkopf P, Zhu J, Gao T. From topology optimization design to additive manufacturing: Today’s success and tomorrow’s roadmap. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2019 Mar 1:1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09331-1 [Article] [DOI]
25. Xian, Y., Rosen, D.W. Morphable components topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2020 Jul 1; 62: 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02466-6 [Article] [DOI]
26. Christensen PW, Klarbring A. Two-Dimensional Shape Optimization. InAn Introduction to Structural Optimization 2009: 117-146. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8666-3_7 [Article] [DOI]
27. Logan DL. A first course in the finite element method (4th ed). United States: Thomson. 2007.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.