Volume 12, Issue 4 (2023)                   Naqshejahan 2023, 12(4): 142-163 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nasiri S, Saremi H, Ahmadi M. Participatory foresight with a humanist urban planning; case study: Tehran with reference to sustainability. Naqshejahan 2023; 12 (4) :142-163
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-65480-en.html
1- PhD student of Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e Quds Branch, Shahr-e Quds Branch, Iran.
2- PhD in Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. , saremi@modares.ac.ir
3- PhD in Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e Quds Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1270 Views)
Aims: Foresight is a knowledge, art, accepting the uncertainty of the future and considering the possibility of the occurrence of various states of the future instead of a specific future. foresight is one of the new technologies in the field of contemporary urban planning. In this study, researchers seek to identify the components of humanistic urban planning and promote participatory urban planning based on scenario writing and futurism
Methods: The main research method is based on the use of the Delphi technique and screenwriting. In the first community, elites, experts, and managers are the three main stakeholders. In the second community, citizens who live in 5 districts of Tehran are the main beneficiary group.
Findings: Based on the results, the first scenarios in the areas of intelligence, participation, transparency, various transportation options, revenue generation, neighborhood orientation, and justice show the best and the sixth scenario and to some extent, the fifth scenario shows the worst possible scenarios.
Conclusion: The results of the research showed that the development of electronic services and businesses in domestic and foreign platforms, putting people at the head of programs in order to create partnerships, increasing income through sustainable methods in order to generate income, consolidating and developing the position of localities in the matter Participation, increasing the share of access to all non-automotive modes, transparency in all matters of organizational offices and establishing justice in the distribution of services are at the top of importance.
Full-Text [PDF 757 kb]   (879 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Urban Design
Received: 2022/10/6 | Accepted: 2022/12/26 | Published: 2023/01/1

References
1. Adidam PT, Bingi RP. The Importance Of Decision Confidence To Strategy Outcomes. Vol. 16, Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 2011. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v16i2.2035 [Article] [DOI]
2. Andersen AD, Andersen PD. Innovation system foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2014;88:276–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.016 [Article] [DOI]
3. Balachandra R. Perceived usefulness of Technological Forecasting techniques. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1980;16(2):155–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(80)90006-2 [Article] [DOI]
4. Batty M. Building a science of cities. Cities. 2012;29(SUPPL. 1): S9–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008 [Article] [DOI]
5. Beard VA. Individual determinants of participation in community development in Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.2005;23:2140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c36m [Article] [DOI]
6. Bezold C. Lessons from using scenarios for strategic foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2010;77(9):1513–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.012 [Article] [DOI]
7. Bradfield R, Wright G, Burt G, Cairns G, Van Der Heijden K. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures. 2005;37(8):795–812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003 [Article] [DOI]
8. Cole S. Dare to dream: Bringing futures into planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. 2001;67(4):372–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976246 [Article] [DOI]
9. Connelly S. Participation in a Hostile State: How do Planners Act to Shape Public Engagement in Politically Difficult Environments ? 2010;25(3):333–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2010.503427 [Article] [DOI]
10. Conrad E, Cassar LF, Christie M, Fazey I. Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning. Environ Plan C Gov Policy. 2011;29(5):761–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c10137 [Article] [DOI]
11. Dixon T, Eames M, Britnell J, Watson GB, Hunt M. Urban retrofitting: Identifying disruptive and sustaining technologies using performative and foresight techniques. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2014; 89:131–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.027 [Article] [DOI]
12. Dufva M, Könnölä T, Koivisto R. Multi-layered foresight: Lessons from regional foresight in Chile. Futures.2015; 73:100–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.010 [Article] [DOI]
13. Geneletti D. Environmental assessment of spatial plan policies through land use scenarios A study in a fast-developing town in rural Mozambique. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2012;32(1):1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.015 [Article] [DOI]
14. Geneletti D. Use Scenarios a Study in a Fast-Developing Town in Rural Mozambique. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.eiar.2011.01.015 [Article] [DOI]
15. Godet M. Emerald Article: How to be rigorous with scenario planning Michel Godet. Foresight. 2000;2(1):5–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680010802438 [Article] [DOI]
16. Godet M. Integration of scenarios and strategic management. Using relevant, consistent and likely scenarios. Futures. 1990;22(7):730–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(90)90029-H [Article] [DOI]
17. Gulhan G, Ceylan H. Relation Between Land Use and Transportation Planning in the Scope of Smart Growth Strategies: Case Study of Denizli, Turkey. Sustain Urban. 2016; 42:164–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62783 [Article] [DOI]
18. Hamdi, N. Small Change: About the Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities (1st ed.). London: Routledge; 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772532 [Article] [DOI]
19. Höjer M, Gullberg A, Pettersson R. Backcasting images of the future city-Time and space for sustainable development in Stockholm. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(5):819–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.techfore.2011.01.009 [Article] [DOI]
20. Horton A. Article information: A simple guide to successful foresight. Foresight. 2008;1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636689910802052 [Article] [DOI]
21. Innes JE, Booher DE. Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Plan Theory Pract. 2004;5(4):419–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170 [Article] [DOI]
22. Jamini D., shamsoddini A., Jamshidi A. Citizen participation in urban management and identifying its economic and social determinants (Case study: Ilam). Motaleate Shahri, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.34785/J011.2022.007 [Article] [DOI]
23. Jansen RJG, Curşeu PL, Vermeulen PAM, Geurts JLA, Gibcus P. Information processing and strategic decision-making in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of human and social capital in attaining decision effectiveness. Int Small Bus J. 2013;31(2):192–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611406762 [Article] [DOI]
24. Kok K, van Vliet Mathijs M, Bärlund Ilona I, Dubel A, Sendzimir J. Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(5):835–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.004 [Article] [DOI]
25. Lindgren M, Bandhold H.Scenario Planning Revised and Updated. The Link Between Future and Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan London: 2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233584 [Article] [DOI]
26. Martin BR. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Foresight in science and technology.2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329508524202 [Article] [DOI]
27. Myers D, Kitsuse A. Constructing the future in planning: A survey of theories and tools. J Plan Educ Res. 2000;19(3):221–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900301 [Article] [DOI]
28. Myers D. Symposium: Putting the future in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. 2001;67(4):365–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976244 [Article] [DOI]
29. Nabil NA, Elsayed G, Eldayem A. Influence of mixed land-use on realizing the social capital.HBRC Journal .2015; 11(2):28598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.009 [Article] [DOI]
30. Peris Blanes J. Key governance principles underpinning urban sustainable development planning and management. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2008; 117:55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/SC080061 [Article] [DOI]
31. Ratcliffe J, Krawczyk E. Imagineering city futures: The use of prospective through scenarios in urban planning. Futures. 2011;43(7):642–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005 [Article] [DOI]
32. Ratcliffe JS. Challenges for corporate foresight: Towards strategic prospective through scenario thinking. Foresight. 2006;8(1):39–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680610647138 [Article] [DOI]
33. Reed MS, Kenter J, Bonn A, et al. Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manage. 2013; 128:345-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016 [Article] [DOI]
34. Reger G. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Technology Foresight in Companies: From an Indicator to a Network and Process Perspective. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2001;(July 2013):37–41. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09537320127286 [Article] [DOI]
35. Reger, G. (2001). Technology foresight in companies: From an indicator to a network and process perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(4), 533-553. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09537320127286 [Article] [DOI]
36. Roney CW. Planning for strategic contingencies. Bus Horiz. 2003;46(2):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(03)00007-7 [Article] [DOI]
37. Safaee pour M, Hosseini NA, Gheysari N. On the Relationship Between Citizens' Satisfaction of the Municipal's Performance and the Urban Environment's Sustainability Indexes, Case Study: Dezful. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 2015; 6(11): 25-40. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25383930.1394.6.11.2.1 [Article] [DOI]
38. Santos MDM, Coelho GM, Santos D, et.al. Text mining as a valuable tool in foresight exercises: A study on nanotechnology. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2006;(January 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.020 [Article] [DOI]
39. Schwab P, Cerutti F, Von Reibnitz UH. Foresight - Using scenarios to shape the future of agricutural research. Foresight. 2003;5(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310471299 [Article] [DOI]
40. Shafizadeh Moghadam H, Helbich M. Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the megacity of Mumbai, India: A Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model. Appl Geogr. 2013; 40:140–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.01.009 [Article] [DOI]
41. Shanbehpoor F, Safaeepour M. foresight Urban Development based on scenarios (Case Study: Ahwaz Metropolis). Geography and Human Relationships, 2019; 2(3): 456-475. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1398.2.3.29.1 [Article] [DOI]
42. Sharifi A. From Garden City to Eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development from Garden City to Eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustain Cities Soc. 2017;20(October):1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002 [Article] [DOI]
43. Shi B, Yang J. Scale, distribution, and pattern of mixed land use in central districts: A case study of Nanjing, China. Habitat International. 2015; 46:166–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.008 [Article] [DOI]
44. Song Y, Knaap G. Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2004; 34:663–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.003 [Article] [DOI]
45. Steele W, Wiesel I, Maller C. Geoforum More-than-human cities: Where the Wild Things Are. Geoforum. 2019;106(March):4115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.007 [Article] [DOI]
46. Stojanovic M, Mitkovic P, Mitkovic M. The scenario method in urban planning. Facta Univ - Ser Archit Civ Eng. 2014;12(1):81–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FUACE1401081S [Article] [DOI]
47. Sung H, Oh J. Transit-oriented development in a high-density city : Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul , Korea. Cities. 2011;28(1):70–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.004 [Article] [DOI]
48. Underwood JG, Francis J, Gerber LR. Incorporating biodiversity conservation and recreational wildlife values into smart growth land use planning. Landsc Urban Plan. 2011; 100:136–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.014 [Article] [DOI]
49. Varum CA, Melo C. Directions in scenario planning literature - A review of the past decades. Futures. 2010;42(4):355–69. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.021 [Article] [DOI]
50. Volkery A, Ribeiro T. Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technol Forecast Soc Change . 2009;76(9):1198–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009 [Article] [DOI]
51. Von Wirth T, Wissen Hayek U, Kunze A, Neuenschwander N, Stauffacher M, Scholz RW. Identifying urban transformation dynamics: Functional use of scenario techniques to integrate knowledge from science and practice. Technol Forecast Soc Change [Internet]. 2014; 89:115–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.030 [Article] [DOI]
52. Voros J. A generic foresight process framework. Foresight.2003;5(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379 [Article] [DOI]
53. Wey W, Chiu Y. Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transit-oriented development. Habitat International. 2013; 38:106–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.004 [Article] [DOI]
54. Wey W, Hsu J. New Urbanism and Smart Growth: Toward achieving a smart National Taipei University District. Habitat International. 2014; 42:164–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.001 [Article] [DOI]
55. Woolcock M, Narayan D. Social Capital : Implications for Development Theory , Research , and Policy. world Bank Res Obs. 2000;15(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225 [Article] [DOI]
56. Yang K, Pandey SK. Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes? Public Adm Rev. 2011;71(6):880–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6210.2011.02417.X [Article] [DOI]
57. Yoon BS, Jetter AJ. Comparative analysis for fuzzy cognitive mapping. In2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) 2016 Sep 4 (pp. 1897-1908). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806755 [Article] [DOI]
58. Zahradníčková L, Vacík E. Scenarios as a strong support for strategic planning. Procedia Eng. 2014;69:665–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2014.03.040 [Article] [DOI]
59. Zali N., Atrian F. Presentation of Tourism Regional Development Scenarios Based on the Principles of Futures Studies (Case: Hamadan Province). Town and Country Planning, 2016; 8(1): 107-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2016.59147 [Article] [DOI]
60. Zegras C, Rayle L. Testing the rhetoric: An approach to assess scenario planning’s role as a catalyst for urban policy integration. Futures. 2012;44(4):303–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.10.013 [Article] [DOI]
61. Ansari S, Andalib A. An Evaluation Framework for Measuring Participation in Urban Renovation Projects and it’s Application in The Special Renovation Project of Shahid-Khoob-Bakht Neighborhood. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2016 Jul 10;6(1):5-17. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1395.6.1.5.3 [Article] [DOI]
62. Kamelnia H. Community Architecture Approach in Cluster Housing Design; Assessing Methods of Participation in Contemporary Housing Design. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2013 Oct 10;3(2):63-73. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1392.3.2.1.0 [Article] [DOI]
63. Mahdavinejad M, Amini M. Public participation for sustainable urban planning in in case of Iran. Procedia engineering, 2011; 21: 405-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2032 [Article] [DOI]
64. Zafarmandi S, Mahdavinejad M, Norford L, Matzarakis A. Analyzing Thermal Comfort Sensations in Semi-Outdoor Space on a University Campus: On-Site Measurements in Tehran’s Hot and Cold Seasons. Atmosphere. 2022 June 22;13, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071034 [Article] [DOI]
65. Maroofi S, Taghvaie A, Pourjafar M. Evaluation of the Effects of Religious Spaces on Citizens’ Behaviors with Particular Reference to the Selected Tehran Mosques. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2019 Mar 10;8(4):205-211. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1397.8.4.1.9 [Article] [DOI]
66. Medghalchi L, Ansari M, Bemanian M, Pourjafar M. Spatial continuity in contemporary Iranian architecture. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2016 Sep 10;6(2):48-59. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1395.6.2.5.5 [Article] [DOI]
67. Pourjafar M R, Pourjafar A, Safdari S. Various Types of Islamic City and Pointing Out to Defining the Major Aspects of Ideal Islamic City. Iran University of Science & Technology. 2015;3 (3):1-17. Available from: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-269-fa.html [Article]
68. Latifi M, Daneshjoo K. The Creation of an Architectural Work within the Creation of the Universe Regarding the Holy Quran. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2016 Sep 10; 6(2): 5-15. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1395.6.2.3.3 [Article] [DOI]
69. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Asadi S. Folded double-skin façade (DSF): in-depth evaluation of fold influence on the thermal and flow performance in naturally ventilated channels. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2021 Jun 16:1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2021.1941019 [Article] [DOI]
70. Alilou M, Mahdavinejad M. The Effect of CCT on Vitality and Population Absorption in Urban Area: Case Study of the Safavi Bridge Urban Area in Karaj, Iran. Light & Engineering (Svetotekhnika), Moscow. 2022 Sep 1;30(5): 81-91. Available from: https://l-e-journal.com/en/journals/light-engineering-30-5/light-engineering-30-5-2022-paper-version/ [Article]
71. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Window geometry impact on a room's wind comfort. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2021 Mar 24;28(9):2381-2410. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0075 [Article] [DOI]
72. Mahdavinejad M, Amini M. Public participation for sustainable urban planning in in case of Iran. Procedia engineering, 2011; 21: 405-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2032
73. Pourjafar M R, Pourjafar A, Safdari S. Various Types of Islamic City and Pointing Out to Defining the Major Aspects of Ideal Islamic City. Iran University of Science & Technology. 2015;3 (3):1-17. Available from: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-269-fa.html [Article]
74. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Markazi A.H.D., Bemanian M. Architectural layout design through deep learning and agent-based modeling: A hybrid approach. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 April15; 47, 103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103822 [Article] [DOI]
75. Zafarmandi S, Mahdavinejad M, Norford L, Matzarakis A. Analyzing Thermal Comfort Sensations in Semi-Outdoor Space on a University Campus: On-Site Measurements in Tehran’s Hot and Cold Seasons. Atmosphere. 2022 June 22;13, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071034 [Article] [DOI]
76. Ziari K, Hataminejad H, Pourahmad A, Zanganehshahraki S, Hamghadam N. Presentation the model of smart city governance with a future study approach; Case study: Rasht City. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2023 Jan 10; 12 (4):22-50. https://dorl.net/dor/ 20.1001.1.23224991.1401.12.4.1.7 [Article] [DOI]
77. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Vakilinejad R, Bazazzadeh H, Monfared M. Effects of sea-breeze natural ventilation on thermal comfort in low-rise buildings with diverse atrium roof shapes in BWh regions. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2022 Dec 16:102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102638 [Article] [DOI]
78. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Pourghasemian MH. A new design to create natural ventilation in buildings: Wind chimney. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 Aug 22:105041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105041 [Article] [DOI]
79. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M. Prediction Indoor Thermal Comfort in Traditional Houses of Shiraz with PMV/PPD model. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2022 Jun 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2092774 [Article] [DOI]
80. Hall RE, Bowerman B, Braverman J, Taylor J, Todosow H, Von Wimmersperg U. The vision of a smart city. Brookhaven National Lab.(BNL), Upton, NY (United States); 2000 Sep 28. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/773961 [Article]
81. Shelton T, Zook M, Wiig A. The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society. 2015 Mar 1;8(1):13-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026 [Article] [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.