[1]. Azmati H, Nokhbeh M. Investigating the role of architecture in improving the quality of educational spaces based on a participatory approach. 8th National Conference on Architecture and Sustainable City; 2024; Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran. Available from: [https://civilica.com/doc/2190845](https://civilica.com/doc/2190845)
[2]. Nasr T, Tabibzadeh K. The role of functional components of educational architecture in students’ social anxiety (case study: girls’ high schools in Shiraz). Architecture and Sustainable City. 2022;10(2):53–72. Available from: [https://civilica.com/doc/1550854](https://civilica.com/doc/1550854)
[3]. Abbaszadeh Diz F, Rashidkelyavar H, Rezaei Sharif A. Identifying physical environmental components of schools based on collaborative learning approach (case study: boys’ middle schools in Tabriz). Journal of Educational Technology. 2019;14(2):456–464. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4600.2091](https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4600.2091)
[4]. Delshad Siakali M, Bemanian MR, Mahdavinejad MJ. Re-reading the role of intermediate spaces in the spatial organization of schools in traditional Iranian architecture. Proceedings of the First International Congress on New Horizons in Architecture and Urbanism; 2014; Tehran. Available from: [https://civilica.com/doc/380695](https://civilica.com/doc/380695)
[5]. Belilan Asl L, Etesam I, Eslami G. The role of intermediate space in identity formation of spatial domains in historical Iranian contexts. Hoviat-e Shahr. 2011;(8):59–71. Available from: 20.1001.1.17359562.1390.5.8.6.0
[6]. Moradi R, Soltanzadeh H, Matin M, Mohammadzadeh D. Sociability of spaces between classrooms based on space syntax (case study: schools introduced by the Organization for School Renovation). Iranian Architecture Journal. 2024;(25):97–117. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22052/jias.2024.255108.1310](https://doi.org/10.22052/jias.2024.255108.1310)
[7]. Torkaman S, Soheili J. Analysis of the effect of in-between spaces on place attachment in Qajar mosque-schools (case study: Salehiyeh Mosque-School, Qazvin). Environmental Science and Technology. 2021;23(2):221–231. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2021.49662.4926](https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2021.49662.4926)
[8]. Divandari J, Rezakhani Z, Mousavi S. The role of architectural joints in enhancing creativity among primary school students. Memarshenasi. 2019;2(7). Available from: [https://civilica.com/doc/898393](https://civilica.com/doc/898393)
[9]. Delshad Siakali M, Bemanian MR, Mahdavinejad MJ. Analysis of environmental interaction capacity of intermediate spaces in forming collective spatial systems of urban schools. 2018;17(50):413–433. Available from: [https://www.magiran.com/p1864475](https://www.magiran.com/p1864475)
[10]. Mirsalami M, Omranipour A. Investigating the role of intermediate spaces in mass–space systems and their influence on collective behavior (case study: mosques in Qazvin). Environmental Science and Technology. 2022;24(4):47–60. Available from: [https://sid.ir/paper/1063622/fa](https://sid.ir/paper/1063622/fa)
[11]. Akbarzadeh Z, Heydarnataj V, Ahmadi F, Baezat F. The effect of layout on architectural education space design for improving academic and cognitive performance. Architectural Thought. 2019;3(6):96–109. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2020.11995.1367](https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2020.11995.1367)
[12]. Dehkhoda A. Dehkhoda Dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 1998.
[13]. Esmaili A, Piri S. Investigating the necessity of intermediate spaces at macro scale with transitional characteristics emphasizing indoor-outdoor relationships. Haft Hesar Environmental Studies. 2020;9(33):79–92. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.29252/hafthesar.9.33.79](https://doi.org/10.29252/hafthesar.9.33.79)
[14]. Shojaei D, Partovi P. Factors affecting sociability in public spaces at different urban scales (case study: Tehran). Bagh-e Nazar. 2015;12(34):93–108. Available from: [https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_11093.html](https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_11093.html)
[15]. Ataei R, Pourmohammadi MR. The effect of physical and activity-based identity components of historical contexts on social interactions. Urban Management. 2015;(41):229–246. Available from: [https://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-717-fa.pdf](https://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-717-fa.pdf)
[16]. Abbaszadeh M. Evaluating factors affecting women’s presence in urban spaces (case study: Urmia Bazaar). Urban Geography Research. 2023. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.342453.1695](https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.342453.1695)
[17]. Karimi R. Easy Guide to Statistical Analysis with SPSS. Tehran: Hengam; 2015.
[18]. Eskandari T Z, Hossein Gholizadeh R, Kamelnia H. Conceptual framework for primary school physical design based on Vygotsky’s collaborative learning theory. Educational Innovations Quarterly. 2019;(72):27–52. Available from: [https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_134590_d942c9ae6f070c3235998173a376e85b.pdf](https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_134590_d942c9ae6f070c3235998173a376e85b.pdf)
[19]. Qureshi G A, Rajabifar B, Emadian S A. Visual and artistic components affecting flexible physical structure of open educational spaces. Islamic Art Studies. 2022;19(46):372–392. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22034/ias.2022.352223.2025](https://doi.org/10.22034/ias.2022.352223.2025)
[20]. Nikrosh R, Eslami S G, Sabernejad Z, Kalantari A. Sociability patterns in educational spaces based on constructivism. Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities. 2023;15(2):35–62. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2023.3721.3887](https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2023.3721.3887)
[21]. Molavi N P, Jalalian S, Dezhdar O. Environmental capabilities in enhancing sociability of cultural-educational spaces for adolescents. Environmental Science and Technology. 2020;22(11):64–74. Available from: [https://civilica.com/doc/1287229/](https://civilica.com/doc/1287229/)
[22]. Prakash N, Fielding R, Lackney J. School Design Language: Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools. Tehran: Rahdan Publications; 2012.
[23]. Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence. Tehran: Jeyhoon; 1999.
[24]. Zakerhaghighi K. Measuring vitality in urban spaces (case study: Valiasr Intersection, Tehran). Bagh-e Nazar. 2019;16(17):5–18. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.86867](https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.86867)
[25]. Molaei H M, Karimi A, Mahdinejad J. Evaluation of physical indicators affecting vitality (case study: Rasht residential complexes). Human Settlement Planning Studies. 2021;16(1):125–128. Available from: [https://journals.iau.ir/article_681294.html](https://journals.iau.ir/article_681294.html)
[26]. Azmati S, Mozaffar F, Saleh S P, Hosseini S B. Principles of designing university open spaces based on vitality model. Journal of Educational Technology. 2018;12(2):162–170. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3160.1801](https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3160.1801)
[27]. Mahmoudi M. Educational Space Design with Flexibility Approach. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2011.
[28]. Eynifar A. A model for analyzing flexibility in traditional Iranian housing. Fine Arts Journal. 2003:64–77. Available from: [https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_10660.html](https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_10660.html)
[29]. Faraji A, Nouri F. Architectural solutions for improving spatial flexibility in interior architecture. Memarshenasi. 2019;2(12):1–6. Available from: [https://www.ensani.ir/file/download/article/1586669945-10149-12-3.pdf](https://www.ensani.ir/file/download/article/1586669945-10149-12-3.pdf)
[30]. Nazari M, Bemanian MR, Hosseinzadeh M. Factors affecting flexible plan design in Qajar houses. Architectural Thought. 2018;2(3):65–82. Available from: 20.1001.1.25383019.1397.2.3.5.3
[31]. Soltanzadeh Z M, Raeisi A. Educational space design recommendations based on Vygotsky theory and flexibility concepts. Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal. 2024;9:50–67. Available from: [http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-556-fa.html](http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-556-fa.html)
[32]. Alizadeh G N, Shahedi B, Ahmadi F. Analysis of spatial presence based on syntactic values. Philosophical Foundations of Iranian Art. 2024. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.30486/pia.2024.2003602.1066](https://doi.org/10.30486/pia.2024.2003602.1066)
[33]. Majlesi B, Khakpour M, Torkashvand A. Multisensory experience and spatial presence using neuroscience approaches. Iranian Architecture and Urbanism Journal. 2023;14(2):59–79. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2023.321713.1838](https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2023.321713.1838)
[34]. Kim MK, Kim SM, Khera O, Getman J. The experience of three flipped classrooms. Internet and Higher Education. 2014;22:37–50. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003)
[35]. Gernsbacher MA. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist. 1998;53(1):5–26. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5](https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5)
[36]. Madanipour A. Public and Private Spaces of the City. Tehran: ICT Organization; 2010.
[37]. Schreiber J, Nora A, Stage F, Barlow E, King J. Reporting SEM and CFA results. Journal of Educational Research. 2006;99:323–337. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338](https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338)
[38]. Sivo SA, Fan XT, Witta EL, Willse JT. Optimal cutoff criteria in SEM. Journal of Experimental Education. 2006;74(3):267–289. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.3.267-288](https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.3.267-288)
[39]. Hoe SL. Issues in adopting SEM technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2008;3(1):76–83. Available from: [https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6171&context=sis_research](https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6171&context=sis_research)
[40]. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th ed. New York: Guilford; 2023. Available from: [https://www.amazon.com/Principles-Practice-Structural-Equation-Methodology/dp/1462551912](https://www.amazon.com/Principles-Practice-Structural-Equation-Methodology/dp/1462551912)
[41]. Izquierdo I, Olea J, Abad FJ. Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies. Psicothema. 2014;26:395–400. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349](https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349)
[42]. Wang L, Bruce C, Hughes H. Sociocultural theories in information literacy. Australian Academic & Research Libraries. 2011;42(4):296–310. Available from: [https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/55448/](https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/55448/)
[43]. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978. Available from: [https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4](https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4)
[44]. Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. Available from: [https://iberian-connections.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/The-production-of-space-by-Henri-Lefebvre-translated-by-Donald-Nicholson-Smith.pdf](https://iberian-connections.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/The-production-of-space-by-Henri-Lefebvre-translated-by-Donald-Nicholson-Smith.pdf)
[45]. Turner JH. The Structure of Sociological Theory. Wadsworth; 2003. Available from: [https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1074419](https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1074419)
[46]. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press; 1986. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218](https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218)
[47]. Motalebi G. A human-based approach to form-making in urban spaces. Honarhaye Ziba. 2006;27:57–66.
[48]. Serdar M. Effect of MIT-based instruction. Educational Sciences. 2007;7(1):231–239. Available from: [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234739264](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234739264)
[49]. Gardner H. Frames of Mind: Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books; 2004. Available from: [https://www.amazon.com/Frames-Mind-Theory-Multiple-Intelligences/dp/0465024335](https://www.amazon.com/Frames-Mind-Theory-Multiple-Intelligences/dp/0465024335)
[50]. Ryan RM, Frederick CM. Subjective vitality and well-being. Journal of Personality. 1997;65:529–565. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x)
[51]. Myers DG. The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist. 2000;55:56–67. Available from: [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56](https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56)
[52]. Ali-Tajer S, Saadati W, Bashir Robati M, Heydari A. Role of spatial configuration in informal settlements. Urban Studies. 2019;(27):57–72.
[53]. Torkashvand A, Ahmadian P, Rashidi B. Enhancing accessibility in public spaces. First National Conference on Architecture and Urban Planning; 2015; Tabriz.
[54]. Danesh J, Tayebi A. Quality of presence in urban squares. Iranian Islamic City. 2019;(4):71–80.
[55]. Danshpour SA, Charkhchian M. Public spaces and collective life. Bagh-e Nazar. 2016;(7):19–28.
[56]. Havens K. Midcentury modern high schools. School Business Affairs. 2010;76(4):12–16. Available from: [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ904665.pdf](https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ904665.pdf)
نقش جهان - مطالعات نظری و فناوری های نوین معماری و شهرسازی