Environmental Access in Architecture: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Author
School of Architecture, University of Tehran
10.48311/bsnt.2026.121895.82959
Abstract
Aims: Research on architecture and the environment has primarily focused on environmental control, indoor environmental quality, and user experience, while the ways in which architecture organizes relationships between users and environmental phenomena have rarely been examined as an independent subject of inquiry. Consequently, the literature still lacks a conceptual framework for describing and analyzing this relationship regardless of the type of environmental phenomenon. This study develops the concept of Environmental Access as a framework for describing and analyzing different ways of organizing access to environmental phenomena within architectural spaces.
Methods: This theoretical study is based on a narrative review and critical analysis of the literature. Through a critical analysis of literature on environmental design, architecture, environmental perception, and environmental control, the concept of Environmental Access is formulated and its analytical framework is developed around two complementary dimensions: Spatial Scope and Richness of Environmental Phenomena.
Findings: The findings indicate that Environmental Access enables the organization of the relationship between architecture and the environment to be analyzed independently of users’ experience, perception, and behavior. Combining the two dimensions reveals distinct configurations of Environmental Access, each of which can support different design objectives and provide a basis for describing and comparing architectural approaches.
Conclusion: As a theoretical framework, Environmental Access offers a novel interpretation of the role of architecture in structuring human–environment relationships. It provides a conceptual basis for connecting environmental control-oriented and experience-oriented approaches while establishing a common analytical language for future research on architecture–environment relationships.
Keywords
Subjects

Nicol JF, Humphreys MA. Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards. Energy Build. 2002;34(6):563-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00006-3
De Dear R, Xiong J, Kim J, Cao B. A review of adaptive thermal comfort research since 1998. Energy Build. 2020;214:109893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109893
Altomonte S, Schiavon S, Kent MG, Brager G. Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Build Res Inf. 2019;47(3):255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1383715
Ayoosu MI, Utsaha AL, Gabriel KE, Vishigh AMM, Tuleun ME, Sen IG. Daylighting performance assessment: A review of methodologies. Path Sci. 2025;11(1):8001-8011. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.113-16
Li H, Wu D, Yuan Y, Zuo L. Evaluation methods of the daylight performance and potential energy saving of tubular daylight guide systems: A review. Indoor Built Environ. 2022;31(2):299-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X21992419
Elsadek M, Deshun Z, Liu B. High-rise window views: Evaluating the physiological and psychological impacts of green, blue, and built environments. Build Environ. 2024;262:111798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111798
Kent M, Schiavon S. Evaluation of the effect of landscape distance seen in window views on visual satisfaction. Build Environ. 2020;183:107160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107160
He S, Zhang W, Guan Y. The impact of building windows on occupant well-being: A review integrating visual and non-visual pathways with multi-objective optimization. Buildings. 2025;15(14):2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142577
Kang J, Aletta F, Gjestland TT, Brown AL, Botteldooren D, Schulte-Fortkamp B, et al. Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment. Build Environ. 2016;108:284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.011
Hygge S, Knez I. Effects of noise, heat and indoor lighting on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. J Environ Psychol. 2001;21(3):291-299. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0222
Lozinsky CH, Casquero-Modrego N, Walker IS. The health and indoor environmental quality impacts of residential building envelope retrofits: A literature review. Build Environ. 2025;270:112568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112568
Zhong W, Schröder T, Bekkering J. Biophilic design towards sustainability in architecture: An evaluation framework and design guidelines for three-dimensional green spaces. Build Environ. 2025:113868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113868
Tekin BH, Izmir Tunahan G, Disci ZN, Ozer HS. Biophilic design in the built environment: Trends, gaps and future directions. Buildings. 2025;15(14):2516. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142516
Quesada-García S, Valero-Flores P, Lozano-Gómez M. Towards a healthy architecture: A new paradigm in the design and construction of buildings. Buildings. 2023;13(8):2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082001
Chang SW, Schiavon S. Effects of window view attributes on occupants' view satisfaction: Findings from human-subject experiments evaluating actual window views. Build Environ. 2026:114164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114164

  • Receive Date 05 April 2026
  • Revise Date 09 September 2026
  • Accept Date 11 September 2026