Definition of New Model of Urban Design Qualities for Underground Urban Spaces

Authors
1 Ph.D. candidate in urban Design & planning, Tarbiat Modares University
2 Assistant Professor of Urban Design
3 Instructor of Underground Structures, Metro School
Abstract
Today, cities need public spaces for social interactions. Shortage of land on the ground level in metropolitan areas is a big challenge for creating public spaces. Using underground spaces for creating public space in urban areas could be an efficient answer to solve mention problem. Using underground area as an urban space is a wise decision for creation of more public spaces in big cities. Creating well organized underground urban spaces for various activities instead of normal unplanned underground spaces need theoretical foundation. It seems existing underground spaces in cities such as Toronto, Montreal, Osaka, Paris and Stockholm and future underground spaces need unique urban design qualities to act as riche public spaces.

This research is a kind of scientific study on urban design qualities of underground urban spaces. The main aim and objective of this research is to derive appropriate urban design qualities for high quality of underground urban spaces. Basically, quality of urban spaces was defined through observing and descripting existing underground urban spaces and their documents such as reports, maps and photograph; beside analysing various available urban design theories.

Importance of accessibility, legibility and their impressive impact on an urban space are significant points that learned from urban design researcher who focus on the mentioned qualities. Special academic information in scientific papers available in national scientific databases of Iran like http://sid.ir and “http://www.magiran.com” shows urban design researchers highlight some of the qualities such as social interaction, security, visual quality and identity. Some of the leading researcher in the field of urban design has focused on accessibility and other qualities like scale of space shape and form, identity in England and America. Underground urban space should answer various urban complexities affecting urban design quality, which differentiate the determination of quality of this kind of space from those on the ground level. Underground urban space requires unique qualities to perform in a different level from other areas of the city such as those on the ground level.

In this regard, according to the characteristics of underground urban spaces, it is necessary to provide a set of urban design quality for these types of urban spaces. Underground urban spaces should be studied with respect to technical (mechanical & electrical), architectural and urban design aspects to provide truly useful results. Therefore in relation with urban design quality, it is important to consider the technical aspects. The technical aspect of locating infrastructure at same level of underground urban space is one of the significant aspects which affect the quality of these spaces.

According to Sariyildiz & Durmisevic [29] and Pourjafar[18], Key aspects that could have influence on underground space design include: accessibility and enclosure; sense of orientation; spatial proportions; communication with the outside world; natural and artificial lighting; materials and colors; noise level; and air quality. Research carried out by the Dutch Railway in 1996 included both above and underground train stations (as underground urban space) and showed that the most negatively experienced places in the stations are the platforms and places where tunnel were located. The reasons for the negative experience are mainly: unwanted behavior of other people, abandonment, darkness and poor visibility. Architecture integrates both function and form. Through form and function the psychological aspects are interwoven by having an influence on the experience of space in a given context. Only when both are together, they give to each other a meaning and a quality. Considering the psychological aspects which can be strongly influenced by the form and functional aspects is very important. In this way the relationship between spatial characteristics, being form and function, and psychological aspects becomes more transparent. [29] The clear meaning of the concept of quality in the field of urban design will help to understand relationship between underground urban space and its set up of quality. Important qualities in three groups such as function, form and psychological aspects could be explained as follow:

Function: communicational patterns, accessibility, space integration, Acoustic, soundscape, lightning, air quality and temperature. [29]

Psychological aspects: Impact of wide and visible view of space for consumers to feel secure and crime prevention (C.P.T.E.D), Escape possibility in crisis, natural lightning, social control, sense of orientation, comfort, maintenance, attraction, various services and infrastrucres. [18]

Shape & Form: tonality and materials harmony in paving, ceiling and wall, structure and partition walls, dimension, natural and artificial furniture, location and design of stairs and escalators.

Overall, it can be found that the most important qualities that response to people’s needs in an underground urban space are security, comfort, legibility and orientation.

The result of this research indicates that: based on discussion on underground space features and people’s essential needs in city scale, underground space qualities derived from international and national urban design researcher’s views and reports of urban design projects in USA & England and various case studies in Tehran. Successful underground space project experiences such as Toronto, Montreal, Osaka, Paris and Stockholm; show appropriate qualities for this kind of space like: Social interaction & liveliness, safety, stability, identity, legibility(sense of orientation), diversity, accordance, homology, sense of belonging, comfort, accessibility, flexibility, moderation and space scale. Therefore underground urban space qualities have to be classified with respect to main underground urban space features and their location under the surface of the ground. In this paper a new model is purposed to create effective various responsive underground urban spaces. This new practical model can be called model of overall quality of underground urban space. Overall qualities of underground urban space were classified into three groups, called: «Outer space» qualities, «In-between space» qualities and «Inner space» qualities (Fig. 1).

Keywords

Subjects


Pourjafar MR, Pourjafar A. (2013) Space Typology. City-Life-Beauty: Tehran Beautification Organization. Special Issue: Public Space, pp. 16-14.
Naghizade M, (2013) Public Space in Iranian Cities. Ketab-Mah-Honar. No. 186, winter 2013, pp. 17-5.
Dobinson K, Bovven R. (1997) Underground Space in the Urban Environment Development and Use: Technical Papers. Sydney: The Warren Centre for Advanced Engineering, The University of Sydney Press.
Montazerolhodjah M. (2015) Considering Design Principles for Urban Underground Spaces through Retraining from Iranian Traditional Sardabs, Case Study: Yazd City; (Ph.D) in Regional and Urban Planning and Design, Tarbiat Modares University; Iran.
Durmišević S. (2002) Perception Aspects in Underground Spaces Using Intelligent Knowledge Modeling. Thesis, Delft University of Technology; Netherlands.
Ashrafzadeh Sh, Kazemi M. (2011) Feasibility underground spaces within downtown area, Case study: Improvment and renewal projects around the holy shrine of Imam Reza (AS). Third Urban Planning and Management Conference, 21-20 April 2011.
Chow F. (2005) Underground Space: The Final Frontier. London: Geotechnical Consulting Group, pp. 20-15.
Molaei A. (2013) Sustainable Urban Development Using Underground Space Development Approach-A Case Study: Tajrish Square. Tehran; Tunneling & Underground Space Engineering. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 88-69.
Cui Jianqiang, (2011) Influencing Factors for Developing Underground Pedestrian Systems in Cities. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 Proceedings, - 28 30 September 2011; Adelaide, Australia.
Bellocchio Durso H. (2011) Subway spac-es as public places: politics and perceptions of Boston’s. Thesis, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts institute of technology.
Carmody J, Sterling R. (2008) Underground Space Design – A Guide to Subsurface Utilization and Design for People in Underground Spaces. Translated by Va-hidreza Ebrahimzadeh. Mashhad: Urban development and Revitalization Compa-ny.
Pourjafar A, Bemanian, MR, Ranjbar E, Pourjafar MR. (2014) Comparative Analysis about Development of Subterranean Transportation in Urban Spaces as a Tool to Reduce Air Pollution (CO and PM) Case Studies: Tehran and Tokyo. Human Geography Research Quarterly. Issue 88, pp. 426 - 415.
Karimimoshaver M, Negintaji S. (2011) Role of Underground Space in City Plans. Science of City: Tehran Urban planning & Research Center. No. 12, p. 20-3.
Knights M, Admiraal Han. (2009) The use of underground space in urban development.
Godard JP. (2004) ITA open session. World Tunnel Congress 30 .2004th ITA General Assembly; Singapore, 27-22 May 2004.
Ishioka H. (1992) Security Management for Underground Space. Tunnelling and UT ulerground Space Technology. Vol. 7. No. 4, pp. 338-335.
Durmisevic S. (1999) The Future of the underground space. Elsevier Science Ltd. Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 245-233.
Pourjafar A. (2015) Urban Design Guideline for Underground Urban Spaces Case Study: Imam Khomeini Square, Thesis of Master of Urban Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Golkar K. (2001) Components of Urban Design Quality. Soffeh. Vol. 11, No. 32, p. 65 -38.
Golkar K. (2011) Creating Sustainable Place: Reflections on Urban Design Theory. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
Haghighatbin M, Pourjafar A, Pourjafar S. (2012) Analyses the role of Mural paintings within underground urban space. Art Research Journal. No. 1, spring 2012, pp. 122-119.
Pierre D. (2006) Underground city planning: A French born concept for sustainable cities of tomorrow. International symposium on Utilization of underground space in urban areas. 7-6 November 2006, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Lee AM. (2001) Osaka 2001: Underground shopping malls. Available from: http://academic.csuohio.edu/makelaa/ lectures/Osaka202001%/undermalls. html ]Accessed 2016[.
Barker M. (1986) Using the earth to save energy For underground buildings.
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 65-59.
Besner J. (1990) The underground city: The Montreal model. Presentation at Ge-otech 90, Tokyo 12-9 April 1990.
visitstockholm (2007) Available from: http://blog. visitstockholm.com [Accessed 2013[.
Pourjafar A. (2017) Underground responsible public space. Tarbiat Modares University.
Mehrabian A. (1976) Public Places and Private Spaces. New York: Basic Books.
Durmisevic S, Sariyildiz S. A (2001) systematic quality assessment of underground spaces – public transport stations. Cities. Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2001,
pp. 23-13.
Misaghian Gh. (2008) Thinking on the
concept of urban space. Abadi Journal. No. 63, Summer 2008, p. 18-13.
Korz S, Aarts H, Luten I, Lugtmeijer E. (1998) Hoe Dieper hoe Gevoeliger. Collaboration of TU Eindhoven, TU Delft and Eysink Smeets and Etman;The Netherlands.
Whyte A V T. (1977) Guidelines for Field Studies in Environmen- tal Perception. UNESCO. Paris.
Van Laarhoven A M J (1997) Sociaal Veilig op Papier. Intern report for the NS Railin-frabeheer, NS Railinfrabeheer, Utrecht, The Netherlands.