1. WCED. Our Common Future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, (1987).
2. Ifko, S. Comprehensive Management of Industrial Heritage Sites as a Basis for Sustainable Regeneration. Procedia engineering, (2016), 161, pp. 2040-2045. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com (accessed on 12 March 2018).
3. Nagy, Z.; Rossi, D.; Hersberger, C.; Irigoyen, S.D.; Miller, C.; Schlueter, A. Balancing envelope and heating system parameters for zero emissions retrofit using building sensor data. Appl. Energy (2014), 131, 56–66.
4. European Commission. European Commission Europe 2020: Integrated Guidelines for the Economic and Employment Policies of the Member States; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, (2010).
5. Bernardo, H. Oliveira, F. Estimation of Energy Savings Potential in Higher Education Buildings Supported by Energy Performance Benchmarking: A Case Study. Environments,
6. Axelsson, R.; Angelstam, P.; Elbakidze, M.; Stryamets, N.; Johansson, K.-E. Sustainable Development and Sustainability: Landscape Approach as a Practical Interpretation of Principles and Implementation Concepts. J. Landsc. Ecol. (2012), 4, 5–30.
7. Findell, K.L.; Berg, A.; Gentine, P.; Krasting, J.P.; Lintner, B.R.; Malyshev, S.; Santanello, J.A., Jr.; Shevliakova, E. The impact of anthropogenic land use and land cover change on regional climate extremes. Nat. Commun. (2017), 8.
8. IISD. Sustainable Development. 2016. Available online: http://www.iisd.org/topic/sustainable-development (accessed on 4 December 2017).
9. Potschin, M.; Haines-Young, R. Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. (2013), 28, 1053–1065.
10. Ricciotti, L. Jacopo Molini, A. Roviello, V. Chianese, E. Cennamo, P. Roviello, G. Geopolymer Composites for Potential Applications in Cultural Heritage. Environments, (2017), 4, 91, pp. 2-15. doi:10.3390/environments4040091.
11. Fallahtafti, R. Mahdavinejad, M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. International journal of energy sector management. (2015) Vol. 9 Issue: 4, pp.593-618, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-09-2014-0001.
12. Mahdavinejad, M. Zia, A. Larki, A.N. Ghanavati, S. Elmi, N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on Leed norms in case of developing countries. International journal of sustainable built environment. 3(2) (2014). Pp. 235-246.
13. Tan, Y.T.; Shen, L.Y.; Langston, C. A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. (2014), 18, 66–76.
14. Wilkinson, S.J.; Reed, R. Examining and quantifying the drivers behind alterations and extensions to
commercial buildings in a central business district. Constr. Manag. Econ. (2011), 29, 725–735.
15. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). HKSAR 2009-10 Policy Address: Breaking New Ground Together. 2009. Available online: http://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/09-10/eng/index.html (accessed on 12 October 2016).
16. Mahdavinejad, M. Doroodgar, A. Moradchelleh, A. The impacts of revivalist trends on the contemporary architecture of Iran (1977-2011). Middle East journal of scientific research. (2012) 11(12)
17. Mahdavinejad, M. Bemanian, M. Hajian, M. Pilechiha, P. Usage of indigenous architectural patterns for manufacturing industrial housing, Case: renovation project of Odlajan of Tehran, Iran. Advanced material research. (2012) Volume 548. pp. 875-889.
18. Banimasoud, A. Iranian contemporary architecture. Tehran: Gharb pub. (2011) p. 11.
19. Wu, J. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. (2013), 28, 999–1023.
20. Forman, R.T.T. Urban Regions: Ecology and Planning Beyond the City; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, (2008).
21. Wu, J.; Hobbs, R. Landscape ecology: The state-of-the-science. In Key Topics in Landscape Ecology; Wu, J., Hobbs, R.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, (2007); pp. 271–287.
22. Nassauer, J.I.; Opdam, P. Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc. Ecol. 2008, 23, 633–644.
23. Gibbons, L. V. Cloutier, S. A. Coseo, P. J. Barakat, A. Regenerative development as an integrative paradigm and methodology for landscape sustainability. Sustainability, (2018), 10, 1910; doi:10.3390/su10061910.
24. Ružiˇcka, M.; Miklós, L. Basic Premises and Methods in Landscape Ecological Planning and Optimization. In Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective; Zonneveld, I.S., Forman, R.T.T., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 233–260. Available online: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4612-3304-6_13 (accessed on 8 December 2014).
25. Izakovicova, Z. Suplerova, J. Petrovic, F. Integrated approach to sustainable land use management. Environments, (2018), 5, 37, pp. 2-16. doi:10.3390/environments5030037.
26. Opdam, P.; Nassauer, J.I.; Wang, Z.; Albert, C.; Bentrup, G.; Castella, J.C.; McAlpine, C.; Liu, J.; Sheppard, S.; Swaffield, S. Science for action at the local landscape scale. Landsc. Ecol. (2013), 28, 1439–1445.
27. Nadarajah, M.; Yamamoto, A. Urban Crisis: Culture and the Sustainability of Cities; Whiley-Bacjwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, (2006); pp. 1–79.
28. Mahdavinejad, M. Abedi, M. Community oriented landscape design for sustainability in architecture and planning. Procedia engineering. (2011) Volume 27. pp. 337-344.
29. Javanroodi, K. Mahdavinejad, M. Nick, V.M. Impacts of urban morphology on reducing cooling load and increasing ventilation potential in hot-arid climate. Applied energy. (2018) Volume 231. pp. 714- 746.
30. Samadzadehyazdi, S. Ansari, M. Mahdavinejad, M. Bemanian, M. Significance of Authenticity: Learning from Best Practice of Adaptive Reuse in the Industrial Heritage of Iran. International journal of architectural heritage.
31. Back, S. A Study on the Design Checklist for Ecologically Sustainable Public Space. (2018) Available online at http://www.kisd.or.kr (accessed on 12 April 2018).
32. Mahdavinejad, M. Dilemma of prosperity and technology in contemporary architecture of developing countries. Iran: Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning (2014), 4(2), 36-46.
33. Mahdavinejad, M. Fakhari, M. Establishment of optimum designing pattern in building roof shape based on energy loss. Iran: Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning (2013), 3(2), 35-42.
34. Mahdavinejad, M. Bemanian, M. Molaee, M. Architecture in context – inspiration of contextualism in designs. Iran: Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning (2013), 1(1), 21-34.
35. Häkkinen, T. Assessment of indicators for sustainable urban construction. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. (2007), 24, 247–259.
36. Bullen, P.A. and Love, P.E.D., “Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: learning from the experiences of Los Angeles”, Structural Survey, (2009), Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 351-60.
37. Cooper, I., “Post-occupancy evaluation-where are you?” Building Research and Information, (2001) ,Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 158-63.
38. Wilkinson, S.J.; Remoy, H.; Langston, C. Sustainable Building Adaptation: Innovations in Decision-Making; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014.
39. Rostami, N.G. Ansari, M. Mahdavinejad, M. A scientometric review of citizen participation research: world trend. Theoretical and empirical researches in urban management. (2018). Volume 183. pp. 231-250.
40. Mahdavinejad, M. Ashtiani, S.R. Ebrahimi, M. Shamshirband, M. Proposing a flexible approach to architectural design as a tool for achievement eco-friendly multi-purpose buildings. Advanced material research. (2013) Volumes 622-623 pp. 1856-1859.
41. Mahdavinejad, M. Bitaab, N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. IOP conference Series: Earth and environmentall science. (2017)
42. Howard Snyder, G. “Sustainability through adaptive reuse” pp. 18-20. Cincinnati: Master thesis of architecture, University of Cincinnati, (2003)
43. Langston, C. Green Adaptive Reuse: Issues and strategies for the built environment. In Proceedings of
The First International Conference on Sustainable Construction and Risk Management, Chongqing, China, 18–20 July (2010); Wu, D., Xu, M., Eds.; Volume 2, pp. 1165–1173.
44. Mahdavinejad, M. Ansari, M. Samadzadehyazdi, S. Rafiei, S. Mousavi, K. Estakhr, F. Contemporizing Valuable Urban Districts Regarding to Educating Environment Paradigms, Case: Yazd, Iran. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences - WCES 2013.
45. O’Donnell, C. Getting serious about green dollars. Prop. Aust. (2004), 18, 1–2.
46. Bullen, P.A.; Love, P. The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field. Cities (2010), 27, 215–224.
47. Kincaid, D. Adaptability potentials for buildings and infrastructure in sustainable cities. Facilities (2000),
18, 155–161.
48. Tan, Y. Shuai, Ch. Wang, T. Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for the Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Buildings in Hong Kong. International journal of Environmental research and public health, (2018). 15, 1546; doi:10.3390/ijerph15071546.
49. Mahdavinejad, M. Javanroodi, K. Natural ventilation performance of ancient wind catchers, an experimental and analytical study- Case studies: one-sided, two-sided and four-sided wind catchers. International journal of energy technology and policy. (2014) 10(1)
50. Mahdavinejad, M. Ghasempourabadi, M. Ghaedi, H. The role of form compositions in energy consumption of high-rise buildings (Case study: Iran, Tehran) Advanced material research. (2012) Volumes 488-489. pp. 175-181.
51. Mahdavinejad, M. Doroodgar, A. Mashayekhi, M. Utilization of wind power as a renewable energy in Asbads, case of Iran, Sistan. Advanced Material research. (2012). Volumes 433-440. pp.
52. Wang, H.J.; Zeng, Z.T. A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Syst. Appl. (2010), 37, 1241–1249.
53. Wilson, C. Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Buildings in Toronto, Ontario Evaluating Criteria for Determining Building Selection. Master’s Thesis, Queen’s University Kingston, Kingston, ON, Canada, (2010).
54. Yap, K.K. Industrial Building-Exploring its Potential in Adaptive Reuse in Hong Kong. In Proceedings
of the 2013 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, Karlsruhe, Germany, 10–11 October (2013); pp. 45–58.
55. Kee, T. Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Buildings for Affordable Housing in Hong Kong. J. Des. Built Environ. (2014), 14, 1–14.
56. Huang, L. (2016) Research on the transformation of industrial heritage into residential building, Spain: Technical school in Barcelona, Ph.D. thesis.
57. Lotfi, S. Sholeh, M. Assessing the old buildings reclaim ability into the new life cycle implementing adaptive reuse potential (ARP) model. Iran: Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning (2017), 7(3), 15-34.
58. Yanbin, Y. “Towards the methodology for the use of industrial heritage in China” (p. 8), Turin: Ph. D thesis, University of Polytechnic di Torino, (2014).
59. Hanachi, P. Mollazadeh, F. Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi, S. Developing the conceptual framework of value-based management in cultural and historical places; (looking at the Islamic culture). Iran: Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning (2017), 7(3), 1-14.
60. Moulaii, M. Soleymani, R. Economic growth and urban development through the regeneration of valuable historical buildings case study: Hamedan historic house. Iran: Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning (2017), 7(3), 95-104.