Framework of Conservation Evaluation for Dynamic Cultural World Heritage Sites

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Fatemeh Yazdgerd 1
Pirouz Hanachi 2
Mohammadhassan Talebian 3
1 PhD in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Architecture Faculty, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of of Department of Conservation of Historic Buildings and Urban Fabric, Architecture Faculty, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of of Department of Conservation of Historic Buildings and Urban Fabric, Architecture Faculty, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Aims: Dynamic cultural World Heritage Sites, as irreplaceable resources with tangible and intangible dimensions, have been shaped by a result of the processes of sociocultural production and experiences in the temporal and spatial context and are going through a series of changes over time. The main purpose of this research is assessing the state of conservation of dynamic cultural World Heritage Sites, which is one of the most fundamental issues in the World Heritage monitoring process.

Instrument & Methods: This study elaborates on applied-developed research methods, using an analytical descriptive method in two sections. The theoretical section is based on the logical reasoning method and technique of content analysis and logical inference; and the practical section is based on the survey method and analytic hierarchy process technique.

Findings: Achieving the effective assessment for the state of conservation of dynamic cultural World Heritage Site is based on two substantial criteria: 1) “securing and conveying cultural significance of the heritage site” with the sub-criteria of “integrity” and “authenticity”; 2) “heritage site experience” with the sub-criteria of “perception of cultural significance” and “experience of authenticity”.

Conclusion: The results show that the “sense of place attachment” indicator is the most important factor in assessing the state of conservation. And periodic use of this proposed model in the monitoring process provides a coherent platform for measuring the efficiency of the study heritage site management system. The developed framework might be used by Tehran Beautification Organization and Tehran Municipality in culturally-rich sites of Tehran.

Keywords

Subjects

1- Rodwell D. Conservation and Sustainability in Historic Cities. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470759547
2- Li Q, Yuichi F, Morris M. Study on the Buffer Zone of a Cultural Heritage Site in an Urban Area: The Case of Shenyang Imperial Palace in China. The Sustainable City IX [Internet]. WIT Press; 2014; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/sc140942
3- Abdel Tawab AG. Evaluating the Authenticity of Earthen Heritage: The Case of Ramses Wissa Wassef Art Centre in Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2013;52(3):489–498. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.05.002
4- ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. International Journal of Cultural Property [Internet]. Cambridge University Press (CUP); 2008;15(4):377–383. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739108080417
5- Annex 3. The UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. The Historic Urban Landscape [Internet]. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012; 209–216. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119968115.app3
6- Crouch D. Affect, Heritage, Feeling. In: Waterton E, Watson S, editor. The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. 177-190. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137293565_11
7- Waterton E, Watson S. The Ontological Politics of Heritage; or How Research Can Spoil a Good Story. The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research [Internet]. Palgrave Macmillan; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137293565.0007
8- Poulios I. The Past in the Present. A living Heritage Approach – Meteora, Greece. Ubiquity Press Ltd; 2014. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bak
9- Zancheti SM, Flaviana L, Rosane P. Judging the Authenticity of the City. In: Stanley-Price N, King J, editor. Conserving the Authentic: Essays in Honour of Jukka Jokilehto. Rome: ICCROM; 2009. 163-168. Available from: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/ICCROM_ICS10_JukkaFestchrift_en.pdf.
10- Khalaf RW. The Implementation of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: Continuity and Compatibility as Qualifying Conditions of Integrity. Heritage [Internet]. MDPI AG; 2020;3(2):384–401. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020023
11- Khalaf RW. Continuity: a fundamental yet overlooked concept in World Heritage policy and practice. International Journal of Cultural Policy [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2019;27(1):102–116. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2019.1696782
12- Wang Y, Huang S (Sam), Kim AK. Toward a Framework Integrating Authenticity and Integrity in Heritage Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2015 ;23(10):1468–1481. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1047375
13- Jokilehto J. Considerations on Authenticity and Integrity in World Heritage Context [Internet]. City & Time. 2006 ; 2(1): 1-16. Available from: http://www.ceci-br.org/novo/revista/docs2006/CT-2006-44.pdf.
14- Jokilehto J. International Charters on Urban Conservation: Some Thoughts on the Principles Expressed in Current International Doctrine [Internet]. City & Time. 2007; 3 (3): 23-42. Available from: http://ceci-br.org/novo/revista/docs2008/CT-2008-119.pdf.
15- Ashurst J. Conservation of Ruins. Routledge; 2007; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780080466910
16- UNESCO. International World Heritage Expert Meeting on Visual Integrity. 6–9 March 2013, Agra, India [Internet]. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre; 2013. Available from: https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/events/documents/event-992-12.pdf.
17- Maciel Silva P, Zancheti SM. Attributes of Modern Architecture and Conservation Action [Internet]. Texto Para Discussão. 2014; 59(2): 1-13. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silvio_Zancheti/publication/307857907_ATTRIBUTES_OF_MODERN_ARCHITECTURE_AND_CONSERVATION_ACTION/links/57cf215e08aed67897011667.pdf.
18- Mendes Zancheti S, Piccolo Loretto R. Dynamic integrity: A Concept to Historic Urban Landscape. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development [Internet]. Emerald; 2015;5(1):82–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-03-2014-0009
19- Taylor K. Cultural Heritage Management: A Possible Role for Charters and Principles in Asia. International Journal of Heritage Studies [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2004;10(5):417–433. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1352725042000299045
20- Pereira Roders AR, Van Oers R. Managing Change. In: Albert, M.T.; Bernecker, R.; Britta, R, editors. Understanding Heritage (Heritage Studies, 1) [Internet]. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2013. 89-104. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110308389.89
21- Karakul O. Authenticity as a Sustainable Value of Holistic Conservation: The Case of Turkey’s World Heritage Sites. MEGARON / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal [Internet]. Kare Publishing; 2016; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2016.54366
22- Fadaei Nezhad S, Eshrati P, Eshrati D. A Definition of Authenticity Concept in Conservation of Cultural Landscapes. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR [Internet]. Emerald; 2015; 9(1): 93-107. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.473
23 - Feilden BM, Jokilehto J. Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites. Rome: ICCROM; 1998. Available from: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/2018-02/1998_feilden_management_guidelines_eng_70071_light_0.pdf
24- Wang SY. In Search of Authenticity in Historic Cities in Transformation: The Case of Pingyao, China. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2011;9(1):18–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2010.521562
25- Mason R. Fixing Historic Preservation: A Constructive Critique of Significance [Internet]. Places. 2004; 16(1): 64-71. Available from: https://placesjournal.org/assets/legacy/pdfs/fixing-historic-preservation.pdf.
26- Cruz A, Coffey V, Chan THT, Perovic M. Developing a Maintenance-Focussed Conservation Model: An Australian Overview. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development [Internet]. Emerald; 2021; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-02-2021-0030
27 - Mendes Zancheti S, Tone Ferreira Hidaka L. Measuring Urban Heritage Conservation: Theory and Structure (part 1). Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development [Internet]. Emerald; 2011;1(2):96–108. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20441261111171666
28- Jones S. Negotiating Authentic Objects and Authentic Selves. Journal of Material Culture [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2010;15(2):181–203. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359183510364074
29- Wang N. Rethinking Authenticity in Tourism Experience. Annals of Tourism Research [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 1999; 26(2):349–370. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-7383(98)00103-0
30- Jones S. Experiencing Authenticity at Heritage Sites: Some Implications for Heritage Management and Conservation. Conservation and Management of Archaeological sites [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2009;11(2):133–147. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/175355210x12670102063661
31- Cohen E, Cohen SA. Authentication: Hot and Cool. Annals of Tourism research [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2012;39(3):1295–1314. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.03.004
32- Su J. Conceptualising the Subjective Authenticity of Intangible Cultural Heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2018 ; 24(9):919–937. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1428662
33- Steiner CJ, Reisinger Y. Understanding Existential Authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2006 ;33(2):299–318. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.08.002
34- Budruk M, White DD, Wodrich JA, Van Riper CJ. Connecting Visitors to People and Place: Visitors’ Perceptions of Authenticity at Canyon de Chelly National Monument, Arizona. Journal of Heritage Tourism [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2008; 3(3):185–202. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17438730802139004
35- Kyle GT, Absher JD, Graefe AR. The Moderating Role of place Attachment on the Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Fees and Spending Preferences. Leisure Sciences [Internet]. Informa UK Limited; 2003; 25(1):33–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400306552
36- Pour Jafar MR, Pourmand H, Zabihi H, Hashemidiamane LS, Taban M. Phenomenology of Identity and Place in Historical Textures [Internet]. Journal of Iranian Islamic city. 2011; (3): 11-19. [Persian] Available from: http://iic.icas.ir/image/Journal/Article/No3/2.pdf.