Volume 9, Issue 2 (2019)
Naqshejahan 2019, 9(2): 145-155 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mardomi K, Moodi A. Agent-Based Modeling; a Paradigm to Deal with Complexity and Uncertainty in Architectural and Environmental Problems. Naqshejahan 2019; 9 (2) :145-155
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-21572-en.html
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-21572-en.html
1- Architecture Department, Architecture & Municipal Engineering Faculty, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Master ,arminmoodi@gmail.com
2- Master ,
Abstract: (4759 Views)
Attempts to describe what designers do by thinking of designing as a process, has its roots in systems theory. Many of design problems are made-up of heterogeneous elements, when interacting with each other; produce emergent properties, persistence over time, and adapting to changing circumstances. Hence, designers and planners have been widely paying attention to computational thinking. Despite the recent success of computational modeling and simulation methods, many of them remain incapable of illustrating the emergence phenomenon, highlighting interactions between heterogeneous agents and confronting distributed phenomena over time. Therefor in recent years, designers have shifted their focus into agent-based modeling paradigms in order to explain how to deal with such issues and to look at many potential results as options and future predictions. The aim of this paper is to review agent-based modeling, exploring the main applications in architecture and to investigate research gaps. For this purpose 203 related articles during the period from 2001 to 2016 had been surveyed, the following articles were grouped because of their common themes, Then each group explained to provide a better understanding of the prospects ahead for further studies on this modeling paradigm. Examination of the main lines of thought in its applications also indicates that collaborative design is no longer of interest to designers and robots are new and emerging area in this fields.
Keywords: Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), ABM Application, Complexity, Architecture and Urban, Bottom-up Design
Article Type: Systematic Review |
Subject:
Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2018/05/31 | Accepted: 2018/07/25 | Published: 2019/09/21
Received: 2018/05/31 | Accepted: 2018/07/25 | Published: 2019/09/21
References
1. Zhou J, Chen Y. A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(4):1321-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.017 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
2. Gratia E, De Herde A. Greenhouse effect in double-skin facade. Energy Build. 2007;39(2):199-211. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.06.004 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
3. Hashemi N, Fayaz R, Sarshar M. Thermal behavior of a ventilated double skin facade in hot arid climate. Energy Build. 2010;42(10):1823-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.019 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
4. W. Lou W, Huang M, Zhang M, Lin N. Experimental and zonal modeling for wind pressures on double-skin facades of a tall building. Energy Build. 2012;54:179-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.06.025 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
5. Zhou J, Chen Y. A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(4):1321-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.017 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
6. Ghadamian H, Ghadimi M, Shakouri M, Moghadasi M, Moghadasi M. Analytical solution for energy modeling of double skin façades buildings. Energy Build. 2012;50:158-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.034 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
7. Ghadimi M, Ghadamian H, Hamidi AA, Shakouri M, Ghahremanian S. Numerical analysis and parametric study of the thermal behavior in multiple-skin façades. Energy Build. 2013;67:44-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.014 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
8. Mateus MN, Pinto A, Graca G. Validation of EnergyPlus thermal simulation of a double skin naturally and mechanically ventilated test cell. Energy Build. 2014;75:511-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.043 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
9. M. Farrokhzad, Z. Nayebi. Double skin glass façade and its effect on saving energy. Int J Archit Eng Urban Plan. 2014;24(2):65-74. [link]
10. Stec WJ, Van Paassen AHC, Maziarz A. Modelling the double skin façade with plants. Energy Build. 2005;37(5):419-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.008 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
11. Yao J. An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements. Build Environ. 2014;71:24-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.09.011 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
12. Tzempelikos A, Athienitis A. The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy. 2007;81(3):369-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.015 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
13. Al Dakheel J, Aoul K. Building Applications, opportunities and challenges of active shading systems: A state-of-the-art review. Energ. 2017;10(10):1672. [DOI:10.3390/en10101672 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
14. Lee DS, Koo SH, Seong YB, Jo JH. Evaluating thermal and lighting energy performance of shading devices on kinetic façades. Sustain. 2016;8(9):883. [DOI:10.3390/su8090883 Add to Citavi project by DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |