1. Lee JH, Ostwald MJ, Kim MJ. Characterizing Smart Environments as Interactive and Collective Platforms: A Review of the Key Behaviors of Responsive Architecture. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(10):3417.(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069004) https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103417 [
Article] [
DOI]
2. Meyboom A, Johnson G, Wojtowicz J. Architectronics: Towards a Responsive Environment. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 2011;9(1):77-98. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.9.1.77 [
Article] [
DOI]
3. Loonen RCGM, Trčka M, Cóstola D, Hensen JLM. Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;25:483-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016 [
Article] [
DOI]
4. Barozzi M, Lienhard J, Zanelli A, Monticelli C. The Sustainability of Adaptive Envelopes: Developments of Kinetic Architecture. Procedia Engineering. 2016;155:275-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.029 [
Article] [
DOI]
5. Park JW. Interactive Kinetic Media Facades: A Pedagogical Design System to Support an Integrated Virtual-Physical Prototyping Environment in the Design Process of Media Facades. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2018;12(2):237-44. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.12.237 [
Article] [
DOI]
6. Meagher M. Designing for change: The poetic potential of responsive architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2015;4(2):159-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2015.03.002 [
Article] [
DOI]
7. Ricci A, Ponzio C, Fabbri K, Gaspari J, Naboni E. Development of a self-sufficient dynamic façade within the context of climate change. Architectural Science Review. 2020;64(1-2):87-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1713042 [
Article] [
DOI]
8. Pesenti M, Masera G, Fiorito F, Sauchelli M. Kinetic Solar Skin: A Responsive Folding Technique. Energy Procedia. 2015;70:661-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.02.174 [
Article] [
DOI]
9. Premier A. Solar shading devices integrating smart materials: an overview of projects, prototypes and products for advanced façade design. Architectural Science Review. 2019;62(6):455-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1653259 [
Article] [
DOI]
10. Al-Masrani SM, Al-Obaidi KM. Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies. Automation in Construction. 2019;102:195-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014 [
Article] [
DOI]
11. Holstov A, Bridgens B, Farmer G. Hygromorphic materials for sustainable responsive architecture. Construction and Building Materials. 2015;98:570-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.136 [
Article] [
DOI]
12. Naboni R, Breseghello L, Kunic A. Multi-scale design and fabrication of the Trabeculae Pavilion. Additive Manufacturing. 2019;27:305-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.005 [
Article] [
DOI]
13. Zhang V, Rosenwasser D, Sabin JE. PolyTile 2.0: Programmable microtextured ceramic architectural tiles embedded with environmentally responsive biofunctionality. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 2020;19(1):65-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120932421 [
Article] [
DOI]
14. Reichert S, Menges A, Correa D. Meteorosensitive architecture: Biomimetic building skins based on materially embedded and hygroscopically enabled responsiveness. Computer-Aided Design. 2015;60:50-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.010 [
Article] [
DOI]
15. Ramzy N, Fayed H. Kinetic systems in architecture: New approach for environmental control systems and context-sensitive buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2011;1(3):170-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2011.07.004 [
Article] [
DOI]
16. Sher E, Chronis A, Glynn R. Adaptive behavior of structural systems in unpredictable changing environments by using self-learning algorithms: A case study. Simulation. 2014;90(8):991-1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549714543090 [
Article] [
DOI]
17. Phocas MC, Christoforou EG, Dimitriou P. Kinematics and control approach for deployable and reconfigurable rigid bar linkage structures. Engineering Structures. 2020;208:110310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110310 [
Article] [
DOI]
18. Slaughter ES. Design strategies to increase building flexibility. Building Research & Information. 2001;29(3):208-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010027693 [
Article] [
DOI]
19. John Habraken N. Design for flexibility. Building Research & Information. 2008;36(3):290-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801995882 [
Article] [
DOI]
20. Saleh JH, Mark G, Jordan NC. Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems. Journal of Engineering Design. 2009;20(3):307-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820701870813
21. De Toni A, Tonchia S. Manufacturing flexibility: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 1998;36(6):1587-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075498193183 [
Article] [
DOI]
22. Mofidi F, Akbari H. Intelligent buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings. 2020;223:110192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110192 [
Article] [
DOI]
23. Sovacool BK, Furszyfer Del Rio DD. Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;120:109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109663 [
Article] [
DOI]
24. Madanipour A. Public and Private Spaces of the City: Routledge; 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402856 [
Article] [
DOI]
25. Pellegrino P, Jeanneret EP. Meaning of space and architecture of place. Semiotica. 2009;2009(175). https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.049 [
Article] [
DOI]
26. Zafarmandi S, Mahdavinejad M, Norford L, Matzarakis A. Analyzing Thermal Comfort Sensations in Semi-Outdoor Space on a University Campus: On-Site Measurements in Tehran’s Hot and Cold Seasons. Atmosphere. 2022 June 22;13, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071034 [
Article] [
DOI]
27. Vatani M, Kiani K, Mahdavinejad M, Georgescu M. Evaluating the effects of different tree species on enhancing outdoor thermal comfort in a post-industrial landscape. Environ. Res. Lett. (Environmental Research Letters). 2024 May 10; 19(064051):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad49b7 Available at: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad49b7 [
Article] [
DOI]
28. Valitabar M. Mohammadjavad M. Henry S. Peiman P. A dynamic vertical shading optimisation to improve view, visual comfort and operational energy. Open House International. 2021 Jul 9;46(3):401-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0031 Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0031/full/html [
Article] [
DOI]
29. Samanian S. The sense of place in real and virtual spaces and its role in the meaning making and experience of artworks. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi. 2021;26(2):71-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22059/JFAVA.2020.296455.666401 [
Article] [
DOI]
30. Castello L. Rethinking the Meaning of Place: Routledge; 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606163 [
Article] [
DOI]
31. Amini M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Future of Interactive Architecture in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities in Case of Tehran. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. 2019;24(1):163-84. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.9 [
Article] [
DOI]
32. Torabi M, Mahdavinejad M. Past and Future Trends on the Effects of Occupant Behaviour on Building Energy Consumption. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2021 Oct 27;29(2) 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.29.2.28576. Available at: https://sace.ktu.lt/index.php/DAS/article/view/28576 [
Article] [
DOI]
33. Yousefian S, Pourjafar M, Mahdavinejad M, Moshfeghi M. Assessing the effects of urban canyon's open space and CO dispersion with using CFD. Journal of Environmental Studies, 2021 Nov 22;47(3):239-58. [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2021.327715.1008206 [
Article] [
DOI]
34. Schleicher S, Lienhard J, Poppinga S, Speck T, Knippers J. A methodology for transferring principles of plant movements to elastic systems in architecture. Computer-Aided Design. 2015;60:105-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.01.005 [
Article] [
DOI]
35. Mayer S, Verborgh R, Kovatsch M, Mattern F. Smart Configuration of Smart Environments. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 2016;13(3):1247-55. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2016.2533321 [
Article] [
DOI]
36. Mohamed ASY. Smart Materials Innovative Technologies in architecture; Towards Innovative design paradigm. Energy Procedia. 2017;115:139-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.014 [
Article] [
DOI]
37. Moslemi H, Gharabaghi M. A review on electrochemical behavior of pyrite in the froth flotation process. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2017;47:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.12.012 [
Article] [
DOI]
38. Sagdic K, Es I, Sitti M, Inci F. Smart materials: rational design in biosystems via artificial intelligence. Trends Biotechnol. 2022;40(8):987-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.01.005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241311 [
Article] [
DOI]
39. Ashtari B, yeganeh m, Bemanian MR. Structural analysis of research-oriented sustainable architectural design methods and approaches. Journal of Environmental Science Studies. 2022;7(3):5172-87. https://doi.org/10.22034/jess.2022.337484.1764. https://www.jess.ir/article_152197_8829ac93703cdec7a6bc6a11ac6c86db.pdf [
Article] [
DOI]
40. Abdullah YS, Al-Alwan HAS. Smart material systems and adaptiveness in architecture. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2019;10(3):623-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.02.002 [
Article] [
DOI]
41. Aniekan Akpan U, Adedayo A, Kenneth Ifeanyi I, Emmanuel Augustine E, Valentine Ikenna I, Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane N. Green Architecture and Energy Efficiency: A Review of Innovative Design and Construction Techniques. Engineering Science & Technology Journal. 2024;5(1):185-200. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i1.743 [
Article] [
DOI]
42. Torabi M, Mahdavinejad M. Past and Future Trends on the Effects of Occupant Behaviour on Building Energy Consumption. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2021 Oct 27;29(2) 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.29.2.28576. Available at: https://sace.ktu.lt/index.php/DAS/article/view/28576 [
Article] [
DOI]
43. Amani M, Irene Del Monaco A, Nencini D. Analyzing the possibility of using the theory of Gustavo Giovannoni as a model of action in the old context of the historical city of Tabriz. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2024 Jan 10;13(4):1-24. Available at: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-72846-en.html [
Article]
44. Dezfuli RR, Mehrakizadeh M, Najar BS, Bazazzadeh H, Mahdavinejad M. Geometric investigation of entrance proportions of houses from the Qajar to the beginning of the early Pahlavi in Dezful City (1789–1979). Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):57-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.007. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523000870?via%3Dihub [
Article] [
DOI]
45. Mahdavinejad M, Bazazzadeh H, Mehrvarz F, Berardi U, Nasr T, Pourbagher S, Hoseinzadeh S. The impact of facade geometry on visual comfort and energy consumption in an office building in different climates. Energy Reports. 2024 Jun 1;11:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.11.021 Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723015457?via%3Dihub [
Article] [
DOI]
46. Nahri Z, Motamedmanesh M. A New Perspective on Enhancing National Iranian Projects through Adoption of New Technologies. Naqshejahan-Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 2024;14(2):41-56. Available at: https://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-74129-en.html [
Article]