Volume 14, Issue 2 (2024)
Naqshejahan 2024, 14(2): 41-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nahri Z, Motamedmanesh M. A New Perspective on Enhancing National Iranian Projects through Adoption of New Technologies. Naqshejahan 2024; 14 (2) :41-56
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-74129-en.html
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-74129-en.html
1- MSc of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran ,m.motamed@modares.ac.ir
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (847 Views)
Aims: The construction industry is one of the largest industries in the world and one of the most important economic pillars of a country. Throughout history, problems in this field have led human societies to find new solutions. Among today's problems in this field, we can mention the wastage of materials and energy, very high costs, and failure to complete projects on time, which is especially evident in large government projects.
Methods: In terms of methodology, this research has a qualitative nature in which qualitative methods are used. The main results of the research have been achieved by using the tools of library studies, analyzing the documentaries, and interviews with experts.
Findings: The research findings show that the use of new construction technologies and methods can take an effective step in improving the quality of architectural products. The present research provides a method to upgrade the construction industry by recognizing and extracting quantifiable qualities in architectural product production. For this purpose, the integration of software and hardware technologies is emphasized for industrialization and industrial construction.
Conclusion: The results of the research show that the integration of building information modeling technology and prefabrication is an effective step to optimize large government projects. Reducing the time and cost of construction, it increases the satisfaction of users and increases safety, and finally, it helps to improve the quality of the architectural product. The conclusion of the article emphasizes the role of prefabrication in meeting highperformance architecture and energy-efficient architecture and planning.
Methods: In terms of methodology, this research has a qualitative nature in which qualitative methods are used. The main results of the research have been achieved by using the tools of library studies, analyzing the documentaries, and interviews with experts.
Findings: The research findings show that the use of new construction technologies and methods can take an effective step in improving the quality of architectural products. The present research provides a method to upgrade the construction industry by recognizing and extracting quantifiable qualities in architectural product production. For this purpose, the integration of software and hardware technologies is emphasized for industrialization and industrial construction.
Conclusion: The results of the research show that the integration of building information modeling technology and prefabrication is an effective step to optimize large government projects. Reducing the time and cost of construction, it increases the satisfaction of users and increases safety, and finally, it helps to improve the quality of the architectural product. The conclusion of the article emphasizes the role of prefabrication in meeting highperformance architecture and energy-efficient architecture and planning.
Keywords: quality in architecture, new technologies, contemporary architecture, building information modeling (BIM), prefabrication, sustainability, sustainable architecture, large governmental projects
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2024/02/3 | Accepted: 2024/05/7 | Published: 2024/08/1
Received: 2024/02/3 | Accepted: 2024/05/7 | Published: 2024/08/1
References
1. Barreca A. Architectural Quality and the Housing Market: Values of the Late Twentieth Century Built Heritage. Sustainability [Internet]. 2022;14(5). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2565 [Article] [DOI]
2. Khodadadzadeh T. Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. J Proj Manag [Internet]. 2016;1(10):21–6. Available from: https://m.growingscience.com/beta/jpm/2480-green-building-project-management-obstacles-and-solutions-for-sustainable-development.html [Article]
3. Marco Casini. Smart materials and nanotechnology for energy retrofit of historic buildings. Int J f Civ Struct Eng IJCSE 2372-3971 [Internet]. 2014 Oct 30;1:88–9. Available from: https://journals.theired.org/journals/paper/details/4346 [Article]
4. Paul M. Goodrum, Ph. D. E. kentucky transportation center-innovative rapid construction/reconstruction methods [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/KTC.RR.2005.14 [Article] [DOI]
5. Peris Mora E. Life cycle, sustainability and the transcendent quality of building materials. Build Environ [Internet]. 2007;42(3):1329–34. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132305004737 [Article]
6. Akram R, Thaheem MJ, Khan S, Nasir AR, Maqsoom A. Exploring the Role of BIM in Construction Safety in Developing Countries: Toward Automated Hazard Analysis. Sustainability [Internet]. 2022 Oct 10;14(19):12905. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12905 [Article]
7. Motamedmanesh M, Rückert K. Ideology, Technology and Architecture: Transitions from Ancient Rome to Renaissance and Baroque in Italy. 2016;26(2):61–84. Available from: https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100315.html?lang=en [Article]
8. H.B.R. Van Wegen TJMV der V. Architecture in use-an introduction to the programming design and evaluation of buildings ; [Internet]. First edit. 1–10 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080490472 [Article] [DOI]
9. Husin HN, Adnan H, Jusoff K. Management of Safety for Quality Construction. J Sustain Dev [Internet]. 2009 Feb 10;1(3):43–5. Available from: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/1221 [Article]
10. Forte F. Architectural quality and evaluation: A reading in the european framework [Internet]. Vol. 2019, Valori e Valutazioni. 2019. p. 37–41. Available from: https://siev.org/en/issue-23-2019/ [Article]
11. Nelson C. Managing Quality in Architecture [Internet]. first edit. Routledge; Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080479149 [Article] [DOI]
12. Van der Voordt T. Quality of design and usability: a vetruvian twin Qualidade do projeto e usabilidade: um gêmeo de Vetrúvio Theo. Ambient Construido [Internet]. 2009 Mar 17;9(2):17–29. Available from: https://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruido/article/view/7440 [Article]
13. Hansen HTR KMA. The Integrated Design Process (IDP): a more holistic approach to sustainable architecture. In Murakami S, Yashiro T, editors, Action for sustainability: The 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference. Tokyo National Conference Board. :27–9. Available from: https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/the-integrated-design-process-idp-a-more-holistic-approach-to-sus-2 [Article]
14. Losavio F, Chirinos L, Matteo A, Lévy N, Ramdane-cherif A. Designing Quality Architecture: Incorporating ISO Standards into the Unified Process. Inf Syst Manag [Internet]. 2004 Dec 1;21(1):27–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43877.21.1.20041201/78984.4 [Article] [DOI]
15. 16. Galha HM. Economic quality design. In: Procs 15th ARCOM Conference, University of Liverpool, September Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management [Internet]. 1999. p. 345–54. Available from: https://www.arcom.ac.uk/abstracts-results.php?s=15th Annual ARCOM Conference&v=&i=&b=b&p=1405#1405 [Article]
16. Juliet O, Mhairi McVicar SK. Economy and Architecture [Internet]. First edit. Routledge; 2015. 5 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714660 [Article] [DOI]
17. Sakao T. Quality engineering for early stage of environmentally conscious design. Mi Dahlgaard‐Park S, editor. TQM J [Internet]. 2009 Feb 27;21(2):182–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910938164 [Article] [DOI]
18. He B jie, Ye M, Yang L, Fu XP, Mou B, Griffy-Brown C. The combination of digital technology and architectural design to develop a process for enhancing energy-saving: The case of Maanshan China. Technol Soc [Internet]. 2014;39:77–87. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X14000578 [Article]
19. Hong J, Shen GQ, Mao C, Li Z, Li K. Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2016 Jan;112:2198–207. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652615014146 [Article]
20. Moradibistouni M, Isaacs N, Vale B. Learning from the past to build tomorrow: an overview of previous prefabrication schemes [Internet]. 2018. p. 1–3. Available from: https://anzasca.net/paper/learning-from-the-past-to-build-tomorrow-an-overview-of-previous-prefabrication-schemes-milad/ [Article]
21. Kazemi A, Barmayehvar B. Assessment of Safety Management in Reducing Accidents of Construction Sites in the Urban Construction Projects of South of Tehran. J Spat Anal Environ hazarts [Internet]. 2021;7(4):12–4. Available from: https://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3138-fa.html [Article]
22. Windapo A, Moghayedi A, Oliphant D, Adediran A. Exploring the Components of Cost on Construction Projects. J Constr Bus Manag [Internet]. 2018 Aug 21;2(2 SE-Articles):42–50. Available from: https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/jcbm/article/view/573 [Article]
23. Santamouris M, Vasilakopoulou K. Present and Future Energy Consumption of Buildings: Challenges and Opportunities towards Decarbonisation. e-Prime [Internet]. 2021 Oct;1:100002. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772671121000024 [Article]
24. Zhang Y, Wang H, Wang Y. Predicting Building Energy Consumption with a New Grey Model. Tang N, editor. J Math [Internet]. 2021;2021:7873310. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7873310 [Article] [DOI]
25. Kwak YH, Liu M, Patanakul P, Zwikael O. Challenges and Best Practices of Managing Government Projects and Programs to the Theory and Practices [Internet]. First Edit. Project Management Institute, Inc.; 2014. 24–28 p. Available from: https://www.pmi.org/learning/academic-research/challenges-and-best-practices-of-managing-government-projects-and-programs [Article]
26. Salimi F, Salimi M. Integration of risk management and value engineering to reduce the accidents of construction projects. Annu Conf Archit Urban Plan Urban Manag Res [Internet]. 2016;3:7. Available from: https://en.civilica.com/doc/650724./
27. Kalantar A, Kalantar A. Investigating the impact of new technologies in the construction industry. first Natl Conf Struct Eng Iran [Internet]. :1–40. Available from: https://www.en.symposia.ir/ISSEE01 [Article]
28. Davila E, Chang NB. Sustainable pattern analysis of a publicly owned material recovery facility in a fast-growing urban setting under uncertainty. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2005;75(4):337–51. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147970500023X [Article]
29. Giller J. Reinventing the Tent: an Exploration of Fabric construction [Internet]. Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington; 2011. p. 48–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.20387601 [Article] [DOI]
30. Safarzadeh H. An introduction to construction methods in Iran. Sci J Mod Res approaches Manag Account [Internet]. 6(22):641–5. Available from: https://majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/1633 [Article]
31. Soltanzadeh A, Mazaherian H, Heidari S. The effects of cultural behavior on the evacuation of the first residential towers built in Iran (case study: Saman twin towers from the 1970s in Tehran). J Build Eng [Internet]. 2023;76:107231. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710223014110 [Article]
32. Gunawardena T, Mendis P. Prefabricated Building Systems—Design and Construction. Encyclopedia [Internet]. 2022;2(1):70–95. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/2/1/6 [Article] [DOI]
33. Bonenberg W, Wei X, Zhou M. BIM in Prefabrication and Modular Building BT - Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. In: Charytonowicz J, Falcão C, editors. Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 100–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94199-8_10 [Article] [DOI]
34. Heravi G, Laika M. Study and Evaluation of Prefabricated Concrete Buildings Industry by SWOT Analysis: Sustainable Development Approach. Amirkabir J Civ Eng [Internet]. 2017;49(3):603–18. Available from: https://ceej.aut.ac.ir/article_1017.html [Article]
35. Boafo F, Kim JH, Kim JT. Performance of Modular Prefabricated Architecture: Case Study-Based Review and Future Pathways. Sustainability [Internet]. 2016 Jun 15;8(6):558. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/6/558 [Article] [DOI]
36. Bidhendi A, Arbabi H, Mahoud M. Perceived effect of using BIM for improving construction safety. Asian J Civ Eng [Internet]. 2022;23(5):695–706. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00449-5 [Article] [DOI]
37. Bidhendi A, Azizi M, Eshtehardian E. The Role of Using Database of Materials and Equipment in The Building Information Modeling Implementation. 2023;55(4):163–6. Available from: https://ceej.aut.ac.ir/article_5071.html?lang=en [Article]
38. Zhanglin G, Si G, Jun-e L. Application of BIM Technology in Prefabricated Buildings. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci [Internet]. 2017 Aug;81(1):012139. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012139 [Article]
39. McGregor SLT, Murnane JA. Paradigm, methodology and method: intellectual integrity in consumer scholarship. Int J Consum Stud [Internet]. 2010;34:419–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00883.x [Article] [DOI]
40. Naderifar M, Goli H, Ghaljaie F. Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Strides Dev Med Educ [Internet]. 2017 Sep 30;14(3). Available from: https://sdme.kmu.ac.ir/article_90598.html [Article]
41. Melnikovas A, Žemaitis J. Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies. J Futur Stud [Internet]. 2018;23(2):29–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0003 [Article] [DOI]
42. Rezaei A , Karimi M SH. Investigating the impact of integrating building information modeling with the prefabricated industry in advanced countries and Iran. Sci Eng Technol Res Q [Internet]. 2018;6(1):41–8. Available from: http://www.uctjournals.com/farsi/index.php/archive-engineer?layout=edit&id=202 [Article]
43. Mostafa S, Kim KP, Tam VWY, Rahnamayiezekavat P. Exploring the status, benefits, barriers and opportunities of using BIM for advancing prefabrication practice. Int J Constr Manag [Internet]. 2020 Mar 3;20(2):146–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484555 [Article] [DOI]
44. Dezfuli RR, Mehrakizadeh M, Najar BS, Bazazzadeh H, Mahdavinejad M. Geometric investigation of entrance proportions of houses from the Qajar to the beginning of the early Pahlavi in Dezful City (1789–1979). Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):57-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.007 [Article] [DOI]
45. Mahdavinejad M, Bazazzadeh H, Mehrvarz F, Berardi U, Nasr T, Pourbagher S, Hoseinzadeh S. The impact of facade geometry on visual comfort and energy consumption in an office building in different climates. Energy Reports. 2024 Jun 1;11:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.11.021 [Article] [DOI]
46. Mahdavinejad M, Shaeri J, Nezami A, Goharian A. Comparing universal thermal climate index (UTCI) with selected thermal indices to evaluate outdoor thermal comfort in traditional courtyards with BWh climate. Urban Climate. 2024 Mar 1;54:101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101839 [Article] [DOI]
47. Sorayaei T, Ranjbar E, Mahdavinejad M. A Systematic Review of Place-related Psychological Dimensions of Outdoor Thermal Comfort. Urban Design Discourse, a Review of Contemporary Literature and Theories. 2024 Feb 10;4(4):30-68. Available at: http://udd.modares.ac.ir/article-40-64865-en.html [Article]
48. Zolfaghari Tehrani M, Mahdavinejad M, Ansari M, Mansouri B. The influential factors in Persian architecture as a biocompatible and eco-friendly building methodology. Naqshejahan-Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 2024 Aug 10;14(2):1-20. Available at: https://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-72457-en.html [Article]
49. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Larsen OK, Zhang C, Asadi S. Naturally ventilated folded double-skin façade (DSF) for PV integration-geometry evaluation via thermal performance investigation. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2023 Oct 1;45:102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102136 [Article] [DOI]
50. Dezfuli RR, Bazazzadeh H, Taban M, Mahdavinejad M. Optimizing stack ventilation in low and medium-rise residential buildings in hot and semi-humid climate. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2023 Oct 28:103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103555 [Article] [DOI]
51. Fakhr BV, Mahdavinejad M, Rahbar M, Dabaj B. Design Optimization of the Skylight for Daylighting and Energy Performance Using NSGA-II. Journal of Daylighting. 2023 May 23;10(1):72-86. (doi: 10.15627/jd.2023.6) Available at: https://solarlits.com/jd/10-72 [Article] [DOI]
52. Goharian A, Daneshjoo K, Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Yeganeh M. A designerly approach to daylight efficiency of central light-well; combining manual with NSGA-II algorithm optimization. Energy. 2023 Apr 17:127402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127402 [Article] [DOI]
53. Goodarzi P, Ansari M, Rahimian FP, Mahdavinejad M, Park C. Incorporating sparse model machine learning in designing cultural heritage landscapes. Automation in Construction. 2023 Nov 1;155:105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105058 [Article] [DOI]
54. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Vakilinejad R, Bazazzadeh H, Monfared M. Effects of sea-breeze natural ventilation on thermal comfort in low-rise buildings with diverse atrium roof shapes in BWh regions. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2023 Jan 1;41:102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102638 [Article] [DOI]
55. Zou Y, Kiviniemi A, Jones SW. A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safety science. 2017 Aug 1;97:88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027 [Article] [DOI]
56. Migilinskas D, Popov V, Juocevicius V, Ustinovichius L. The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical BIM implementation. Procedia engineering. 2013 Jan 1;57:767-74. [Article] [DOI]
57. Volk R, Stengel J, Schultmann F. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings—Literature review and future needs. Automation in construction. 2014 Mar 1;38:109-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023 [Article] [DOI]
58. Barlish K, Sullivan K. How to measure the benefits of BIM—A case study approach. Automation in construction. 2012 Jul 1;24:149-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008 [Article] [DOI]
59. Li X, Shen GQ, Wu P, Yue T. Integrating Building Information Modeling and Prefabrication Housing Production. Autom Constr [Internet]. 2019 Apr;100:46–60. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580518300414 [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |