Volume 10, Issue 3 (2020)
Naqshejahan 2020, 10(3): 183-191 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moshari M, Nazari S. Learning from Hidden Geometry of Forests and Wild-life Environment for Biophilic Regional Planning. Naqshejahan 2020; 10 (3) :183-191
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-43120-en.html
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-43120-en.html
1- Environmental Planning, Management & Education Department Department, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , moshari@ut.ac.ir
2- Urban Development Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Urban Development Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (4248 Views)
Aims: The main purpose of the current study is to introduce forests and wild-life environment as a source of endless learning and of course in harmony with nature and natural structures to conceive, lead, guidance, implement and manage the regional planning system. A type of regional planning system that achieves the UN Millennium Development Goals with a deep understanding of ecosystem cultural services.
Instruments & Methods: Research methodology is to explore the evidence of the selected case studies from among the emerging dominant exemplars of low-tech development projects in order to outline significant lessons from nature. “Logical argumentation” is selected as research strategy which is going to be developed by deductive approach and FGD (Focus Group Discussion) and snowball sampling in the cases of the forests and the wild-life environment.
Findings: Nature, wild-life and ecosystem includes invaluable source of inspiration. Nature as a source of hidden geometry emphasizes on form and structure, management and process, cultural and spiritual, and recycling and upcycling.
Conclusion: It is essential to sift to low-tech, green economy and low impact planning for biophilic regional planning; which includes holistic and comprehensive approach, planning for CES for better green economy, low-tech and soft development for environmentally-sensitive areas based on local circumstances, and classification of cultural services in natural ecosystems and reorganizing cultural benefits of ecosystem on the basis of environmental education program.
Instruments & Methods: Research methodology is to explore the evidence of the selected case studies from among the emerging dominant exemplars of low-tech development projects in order to outline significant lessons from nature. “Logical argumentation” is selected as research strategy which is going to be developed by deductive approach and FGD (Focus Group Discussion) and snowball sampling in the cases of the forests and the wild-life environment.
Findings: Nature, wild-life and ecosystem includes invaluable source of inspiration. Nature as a source of hidden geometry emphasizes on form and structure, management and process, cultural and spiritual, and recycling and upcycling.
Conclusion: It is essential to sift to low-tech, green economy and low impact planning for biophilic regional planning; which includes holistic and comprehensive approach, planning for CES for better green economy, low-tech and soft development for environmentally-sensitive areas based on local circumstances, and classification of cultural services in natural ecosystems and reorganizing cultural benefits of ecosystem on the basis of environmental education program.
Keywords: Hidden Geometry, Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES), Biophilic Regional Planning, Green Low-Tech
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Hightech in landscape design
Received: 2020/05/24 | Accepted: 2020/07/6 | Published: 2020/10/3
Received: 2020/05/24 | Accepted: 2020/07/6 | Published: 2020/10/3
References
1. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Larki AN, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2014;3(2):235-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.003]
2. Mahdavinejad M. High-performance architecture: Search for future legacy in contemporary Iranian architecture. ARMANSHAHR. 2017;9(17):129-38. [Persian] [Link]
3. Mahdavinejad M. Discourse of high-performance architecture: A method to understand contemporary architecture. HOVIATSHAHR. 2017;11(2):53-67. [Persian] [Link]
4. Mahdavinejad M. Dilemma of prosperity and technology in contemporary architecture of developing countries. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2014;4(2):36-46. [Persian] [Link]
5. Alinasab M, Suzanchi K. Sustainable development of urban River Valley based on ecological assessment (Case study: Darabad River Valley, Tehran). NAQSHEJAHAN. 2013;3(2):51-61. [Persian] [Link]
6. Moshari M, Pourfathollah M. The position of building materials in the preservation of environmental resources in Tehran; Case study: Brick. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2012;2(1):79-90. [Persian] [Link]
7. Azizi MM, Zebardast E, Akbari R. Analyzing environmental justice in Islamic utopian ideology to apply in Islamic urban planning;* Case study: Rural foundation neighborhood of Safein-Kish. J Stud Iran Islam City. 2018;9(34):5-22. [Persian] [Link]
8. Mahdavinejad M. Designerly approach to energy efficiency in high-performance architecture theory. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2020;10(2):75-83. [Persian] [Link]
9. Mohammad Moradi A, Hosseini SB, Yazdani H. Controlling Environmental Impact of Building through Assessment and Improvement of Construction Embodied Energy. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2012;2(2):55-66. [Persian] [Link]
10. Azizi MM, Gharaei A. Land use planning considering sustainable neighborhood development, with emphasis on energy efficiency (case study: Daroos, Tehran). HOVIATSHAHR. 2015;9(22):5-18. [Persian] [Link]
11. Kamran Kasmaei H, Daneshjou K, Mofidi Shemirani SM. Gilan native habitat assessment body-centered sustainable by Sachs and energy simulation software. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2017;7(2):58-77. [Persian] [Link]
12. Mahdavinejad M, Amini M. Public participation for sustainable urban planning in case of Iran. Procedia Eng. 2011;21:405-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2032]
13. Ansari M, Mahdavinejad M, Abedi M. The role of historic and heritage wealth in sustainable tourism development. Asian J Soc Sci Hum. 2012;1(3):70-7. [Link]
14. Pourfathollah M, Mahdavinejad M. Viewerphilic nightscape based on correlated color temperature. Color Res Appl. 2020;45(1):120-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/col.22450]
15. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. Int J Energy Sect Manag. 2015;9(4):593-618. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/IJESM-09-2014-0001]
16. Faizi F, Noorani M, Ghaedi A, Mahdavinejad M. Design an optimum pattern of orientation in residential complexes by analyzing the level of energy consumption (case study: Maskan Mehr Complexes, Tehran, Iran). Procedia Eng. 2011;21:1179-87. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2128]
17. Javanroodi K, Mahdavinejad M, Nik VM. Impacts of urban morphology on reducing cooling load and increasing ventilation potential in hot-arid climate. Appl Energy. 2018;231:714-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.116]
18. Javanroodi K, Nik VM, Mahdavinejad M. A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019;49:101597. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101597]
19. Mahdavinejad M, Javanroodi K. Impact of roof shape on air pressure, wind flow and indoor temperature of residential buildings. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev. 2016;7(2):87-103. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/2093761X.2016.1167645]
20. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zhang G. A study on terraced apartments and their natural ventilation performance in hot and humid regions. Build Simul. 2018;11(2):359-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12273-017-0407-7]
21. Eskandari H, Saedvandi M, Mahdavinejad M. The impact of Iwan as a traditional shading device on the building energy consumption. Buildings. 2018;8(1):3. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/buildings8010003]
22. Kia A, Mahdavinejad M. Interactive form-generation in high-performance architecture theory. Int J ArchitUrban Dev. 2020;10(2):37-48. [Link]
23. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From smart-eco building to high-performance architecture: Optimization of energy consumption in architecture of developing countries. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2017;83(1):012020. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012020]
24. Qasemi E, Mahdavinejad M, Aliabadi M, Zarkesh A. Leaf venation patterns as a model for bioinspired fog harvesting. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2020;603:125170. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125170]
25. Kozina J, Istenič SP, Komac B. Green creative environments: Contribution to sustainable urban and regional development. Acta Geographica Slovenica. 2019;59(1):119-26. [Link] [DOI:10.3986/AGS.7030]
26. Grillitsch M, Hansen T. Green industry development in different types of regions. Eur Plan Stud. 2019;27(11):2163-83. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09654313.2019.1648385]
27. Jin P, Peng Ch, Song M. Macroeconomic uncertainty, high-level innovation, and urban green development performance in China. China Econ Rev. 2019;55:1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2019.02.008]
28. Chen L, Zhang X, He F, Yuan R. Regional green development level and its spatial relationship under the constraints of haze in China. J Clean Prod. 2019;210:376-87. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.037]
29. Mohtashami N, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Contribution of city prosperity to decisions on healthy building design: A case study of Tehran. Front Archit Res. 2016;5(3):319-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2016.06.001]
30. Gao J, Yu Z, Wang L, Vejre H. Suitability of regional development based on ecosystem service benefits and losses: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China. Ecol Indic. 2019;107:105579. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105579]
31. Wang M, Zhao X, Gong Q, Ji Z. Measurement of regional green economy sustainable development ability based on entropy weight-topsis-coupling coordination degree-A case study in Shandong Province, China. Sustainability. 2019;11(1):280. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su11010280]
32. Avdiushchenko A, Zając P. Circular economy indicators as a supporting tool for European regional development policies. Sustainability. 2019;11(11):3025. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su11113025]
33. Xu Z, Sun B. Influential mechanism of farmers' sense of relative deprivation in the sustainable development of rural tourism. J Sustain Tour. 2020;28(1):110-28. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2019.1675675]
34. Jones S, Odero K, Adanu EK. Road crashes in Namibia: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Dev South Afr. 2020;37(2):295-311. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0376835X.2019.1659131]
35. Parivar P, Quanrud D, Sotoudeh A, Abolhasani M. Evaluation of urban ecological sustainability in arid lands (case study: Yazd-Iran). Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;4:1-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10668-020-00637-w]
36. Tabatabaee SS, Zarabadi ZS, Ziari Y, Majedi H. Explaining the pattern of regional development through activity clusters in Tehran Province with an emphasis on competitiveness. Town Ctry Plan. 2019;11(2): 235-62. [Persian] [Link]
37. Khaliji M, Zarabadi Z. Analysis of the industrial town site selection by multi-criteria in Tabriz County by utilizing decision making models. J Reg Plan. 2015;5(19):101-14. [Persian] [Link]
38. Afsahhosseini F, Zabihi H, Jahanshahloo L. Causative investigating the infrastructure of tourism and location competitiveness of tourism destination in arid regions, case study: Maranjab Desert. Urban Tour Q. 2019;6(3):125-39. [Persian] [Link]
39. Piran H, Zarabadi S, Ziari Z, Majedi Y. Explaining sustainable urban transport indicators using structural equations (Case study: Tehran Metro lines 1 and 2). Geogr Reg Plan. 2019;9(2):521-38. [Persian] [Link]
40. Eslami L, Majedi H, Etessam I. Analyzing the latent logic of inclusive design in vernacular architecture of Iran with the approach of sustainability; Case study: 12th district of Tehran (Safavid Fence). BAGH-E NAZAR. 2019;16(77):73-88. [Persian] [Link]
41. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977-2017). J Archit Urban. 2019;43(1):71. [Link] [DOI:10.3846/jau.2019.5209]
42. Zandieh M, Mahmoodzadeh Kani IR, Hessari P. Building information modeling (BIM); A model for improving the design process. NAQSHEJAHAN. 2017;7(2):71-8. [Persian] [Link]
43. Pilechiha P, Mahdavinejad M, Rahimian FP, Carnemolla P, Seyedzadeh S. Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: Quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency. Appl Energy. 2020;261:114356. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356]
44. Ndong GO, Therond O, Cousin I. Analysis of relationships between ecosystem services: A generic classification and review of the literature. Ecosyst Serv. 2020;43:101120. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101120]
45. Karimi A, Jones K. Assessing national human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation in Iran. Ambio. 2020;49:1506-18. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s13280-019-01305-8]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |