Volume 12, Issue 3 (2022)                   Naqshejahan 2022, 12(3): 122-140 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mansouri R, Nasr T. Study of Impact of Virtual Site Survey in Understanding Architectural Value by Students; Case Study: Peter Behrens Building in Tehran Gewerbeschule. Naqshejahan 2022; 12 (3) :122-140
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-64734-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran , r.mansouri.iu@gmail.com
2- Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (1179 Views)
Aims: During the Corona pandemic, many architectural design classes were held virtually, and during this time, visiting the site as one of the most important parts of preparing students for architectural design was also done virtually. The main purpose of this article is to compare and analyze the positive and negative points of virtual site visit among architecture students.
Methods: the virtual site visit is known with 360-degree model. The participants (N=14) were asked to visit the site and then invited for a post-test to examine the motivation and emotions of the participants on the one hand, and the usability of the model on the other hand.
Findings: The experience of a virtual visit to the site brought significant points, which led to conduct qualitative interviews with each participant additionally. The results show the trustworthiness of virtual site visit while show some drawbacks. The results support virtual site visit during the corona pandemic and its acceptable results.
Conclusion: The results of the research confirm the virtual visit of the site as an exploratory method of the 360 model; But it also shows many shortcomings. In examples such as the Behranz Building of the Academy on Ray Street, Tehran, in the field of tangible values, the virtual visit of the site was very successful, while the intangible values of the common industrial heritage of Iran and Germany have not been very successful, and in these cases, it can be done with an in-person visit. There is no comparison.
Full-Text [PDF 1483 kb]   (1142 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Pioneer Islamic Iranian Art and Architecture
Received: 2022/06/8 | Accepted: 2022/09/17 | Published: 2022/09/23

References
1. Bezerra IM. State of the art of nursing education and the challenges to use remote technologies in the time of corona virus pandemic. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 2020 Apr;30(1):141-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v30.10087 [Article] [DOI]
2. Spitzer M. Masked education? The benefits and burdens of wearing face masks in schools during the current Corona pandemic. Trends in neuroscience and education. 2020 Sep 1;20:100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100138 [Article] [DOI]
3. Megahed N, Hassan A. A blended learning strategy: reimagining the post-Covid-19 architectural education. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2021 Aug 9. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0081/full/html [Article]
4. Asadpour A. Student challenges in online architectural design courses in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2021 Nov 1;18(6):511-29. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20427530211022923 [Article]
5. Ceylan S, Şahin P, Seçmen S, Somer ME, Süher KH. An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2020 Dec 14. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230/full/html [Article]
6. Iranmanesh A, Onur Z. Mandatory virtual design studio for all: Exploring the transformations of architectural education amidst the global pandemic. International Journal of Art & Design Education. 2021 Feb;40(1):251-67. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jade.12350 [Article]
7. Zandieh M, Mahdavinejad M. Post-Corona Design: Lessons from the impact of COVID-19 on the presence of elderly in the urban community spaces. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2023 Jan 01; 12 (4) :1-21. Available from: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-63454-fa.html [Article]
8. Shams G, Moshari M. Health and Post-Corona: Air Filtration through Building Skins as Biological Membranes. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2022 Jan 10;11(4):44-59. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.4.3.2 [Article] [DOI]
9. Rasoolzadeh M, Moshari M. Prioritizing for Healthy Urban Planning: Interaction of Modern Chemistry and Green Material-based Computation. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 May 10;11(1):94-105. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.1.7.0 [Article] [DOI]
10. Pourzargar M. Posto-Corona Visioning for Sustainable Adaptive Reuse of Kahrzak Sugar Factory. Naqshejahan-Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2022 Jan 10;11(4):79-95. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.4.7.6 [Article] [DOI]
11. Mohtashami N, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Contribution of city prosperity to decisions on healthy building design: A case study of Tehran. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2016 Sep 1;5(3):319-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.06.001 [Article] [DOI]
12. Samarasinghe DA, Abd Latif S, Baghaei N. Virtual reality models for promoting learners' engagement in construction studies. In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2019 Apr 8 (pp. 1331-1335). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725120 [Article] [DOI]
13. Ghomeshi M, Pourzargar M, Mahdavinejad M. A Healthy Approach to Post-COVID Reopening of Sugar Factory of Kahrizak, Iran. InINTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: New Metropolitan Perspectives 2022 (pp. 2638-2647). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06825-6_252 [Article] [DOI]
14. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Davaie Markazi AH, Hovestadt L. Generating Synthetic Space Allocation Probability Layouts Based on Trained Conditional-GANs. Applied Artificial Intelligence. 2019 Jul 3;33(8):689-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1592919 [Article] [DOI]
15. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Davaie-Markazi A. Generating space layout heat maps with cGAN algorithms in artificial intelligence. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 2020;13(32):131-142. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2020.154406.1717 [Article] [DOI]
16. Tadayon K, Mahdavinejad M, Shahcheraghi A. Advanced mathematical algorithms to outline integrated architectural design process. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design. 2021 Aug 23;9(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.22061/JSAUD.2020.6603.1686 [Article] [DOI]
17. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad, M, Bemanian, M, Davaie-Markazi, A. Artificial neural network for outlining and predicting environmental sustainable parameters. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design. 2020;7(2):169-182. https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2019.4501.1333 [Article] [DOI]
18. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Markazi A.H.D., Bemanian M. Architectural layout design through deep learning and agent-based modeling: A hybrid approach. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 April15; 47, 103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103822 [Article] [DOI]
19. Bakir R, Alsaadani S. A mixed methods study of architectural education during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: Student experiences in design studio and technology courses. Open House International. 2022 Feb 1. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OHI-09-2021-0206/full/html [Article]
20. Brzezicki M. Strengths and weaknesses of architectural education on-line classes conducted during COVID-19. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education. 2020;18(4):381-6. Available from: http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/Vol.18,%20No.4%20(2020)/03-Brzezicki-M.pdf [Article]
21. Maturana B, Salama AM, McInneny A. Architecture, urbanism and health in a post-pandemic virtual world. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2021 Mar 11. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARCH-02-2021-0024/full/html [Article]
22. Sun Y, Albeaino G, Gheisari M, Eiris R. Virtual Collaborative Spaces for Online Site Visits: A Plan-Reading Pilot Study. EPiC Series in Built Environment. 2022 May 15;3:688-96. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Masoud-Gheisari-2/publication/360614736_Virtual_Collaborative_Spaces_for_Online_Site_Visits_A_Plan-Reading_Pilot_Study/links/628171a33a23744a7282d814/Virtual-Collaborative-Spaces-for-Online-Site-Visits-A-Plan-Reading-Pilot-Study.pdf [Article]
23. Eiris R, Wen J, Gheisari M. iVisit-Collaborate: Collaborative problem-solving in multiuser 360-degree panoramic site visits. Computers & Education. 2022 Feb 1;177:104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104365 [Article] [DOI]
24. Oprean D, Verniz D, Zhao J, Wallgrün JO, Duarte JP, Klippel A. Remote studio site experiences: Investigating the potential to develop the immersive site visit. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2018.1.421 [Article] [DOI]
25. Mei Q, Wing R. Robotic 360/spl deg/photography for virtual site visits. In1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization (Cat. No. PR00210) 1999 Jul 14 (pp. 214-219). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IV.1999.781561 [Article] [DOI]
26. Wergles N, Muhar A. The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2009 Jul 30;91(4):171-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010 [Article] [DOI]
27. Newton C. Simulated Site Visits. A 4D multimedia database for the study of architectural construction. In1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization (Cat. No. PR00210) 1999 Jul 14 (pp. 62-66). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IV.1999.781537 [Article] [DOI]
28. Pickersgill RS, Rameezdeen R, Harvey J. OnSite: The Virtual Site Visit as an Environment for Construction Learning. InClaiming Identity Through Redefined Teaching in Construction Programs 2020 (pp. 153-176). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8452-0.ch009 [Article] [DOI]
29. White S, Feiner S. SiteLens: situated visualization techniques for urban site visits. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2009 Apr 4 (pp. 1117-1120). Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1518701.1518871 [Article]
30. George BH. Using virtual tours to facilitate sustainable site visits of historic sites. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2018 Oct 1;7(4):411. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p411 [Article] [DOI]
31. Levy RM. Virtual reality: a tool for urban planning and public engagement. In12th International Conference on computers in urban planning and urban management (CUPUM). Bamff (Canada) 2011. Available from: https://people.ucalgary.ca/~rmlevy/Publications/Levy_RM_CUPUM2011.pdf [Article]
32. Kowalewski B, Girot C. The Site Visit: Towards a Digital in Situ Design Tool. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture. 2021 Jun:258-66. Available from: https://gispoint.de/fileadmin/user_upload/paper_gis_open/DLA_2021/537705022.pdf [Article]
33. Li TY, Lien JM, Chiu SY, Yu TH. Automatically generating virtual guided tours. InProceedings Computer Animation 1999 1999 May 26 (pp. 99-106). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CA.1999.781203 [Article] [DOI]
34. Chen RB, Sekar A. Investigating the impact of Sense of Place on site visit frequency with non-motorized travel modes. Journal of transport geography. 2018 Jan 1;66:268-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.12.008 [Article] [DOI]
35. Kuflik T, Wecker AJ, Lanir J, Stock O. An integrative framework for extending the boundaries of the museum visit experience: linking the pre, during and post visit phases. Information Technology & Tourism. 2015 Mar;15(1):17-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-014-0018-4 [Article] [DOI]
36. Azhar S, Kim J, Salman A. Implementing virtual reality and mixed reality technologies in construction education: Students’ perceptions and lessons learned. In11th annual International Conference of Education 2018 Nov 12. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeffrey-Kim-5/publication/329228115_Implementing_Virtual_Reality_and_Mixed_Reality_Technologies_in_Construction_Education_Students'_Perceptions_and_Lessons_Learned/links/5c10145ea6fdcc494fed8c72/Implementing-Virtual-Reality-and-Mixed-Reality-Technologies-in-Construction-Education-Students-Perceptions-and-Lessons-Learned.pdf [Article]
37. Maghool SA, Moeini SH, Arefazar Y. An educational application based on virtual reality technology for learning architectural details: challenges and benefits. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2018 Nov 1;12(3):246. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/16a1e7af4e31fc72d106915cd9ce4a02/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=276235 [Article]
38. Sepasgozar SM. Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for online education: A case of construction management and engineering. Applied Sciences. 2020 Jul 7;10(13):4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134678 [Article] [DOI]
39. Chanda R, Haque ME. A Virtual Tour of a Steel Structural Construction. In2005 GSW 2022 May 24. Available from: https://peer.asee.org/a-virtual-tour-of-a-steel-structural-construction [Article]
40. Buru KH. Public Health Accreditation Board’s Changes in Response to COVID-19: Exploring the Site Visitor Model (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/3d4b314bd9d3da8e41c68dd65ff4d38c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Article]
41. Wu X, Lai IK. The use of 360-degree virtual tours to promote mountain walking tourism: Stimulus–organism–response model. Information Technology & Tourism. 2022 Mar;24(1):85-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-021-00218-1 [Article] [DOI]
42. Zhu H, Li T, Wang C, Jin W, Murali S, Xiao M, Ye D, Li M. EyeQoE: A Novel QoE Assessment Model for 360-degree Videos Using Ocular Behaviors. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2022 Mar 29;6(1):1-26. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3517240 [Article]
43. Akimoto N, Matsuo Y, Aoki Y. Diverse Plausible 360-Degree Image Outpainting for Efficient 3DCG Background Creation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022 (pp. 11441-11450). Available from: https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2022/html/Akimoto_Diverse_Plausible_360-Degree_Image_Outpainting_for_Efficient_3DCG_Background_Creation_CVPR_2022_paper.html [Article]
44. Wei X, Zhou M, Jia W. Towards Low-Latency and High-Quality Adaptive 360-Degree Streaming. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2022 Jul 19. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3192398 [Article] [DOI]
45. Diba D. Contemporary architecture of Iran. Architectural Design. 2012 May;82(3):70-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1406 [Article] [DOI]
46. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2019 Feb 1;43(1):71-90. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.5209 [Article] [DOI]
47. Diba D. L'Iran et l'architecture contemporaine. Mimar (Singapore). 1991;38:20-25. [French] Available from: francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19648743 [Article]
48. Diba D, Dehbashi M. Trends in modern Iranian architecture. J Iran Archit Chang Soc. 2004:31-41. Available from: https://b2n.ir/a12379 [Article]
49. Mahdavinejad M. Discourse of High-Performance Architecture: A Method to Understand Contemporary Architecture. Hoviatshahr, 2017 Aug 23;11(2):53-67. [Persian] Available from: http://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_10930_79f91b76bac9a77aba9d4aff60465705.pdf [Article]
50. Mahdavinejad M. High-Performance Architecture: Search for Future Legacy in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2017 Mar 14;9(17):129-138. [Persian] Available from: http://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_44611_955a20b5cfd1f32308e627ddc8528b91.pdf [Article]
51. Latifi M, Daneshjoo K. The Creation of an Architectural Work within the Creation of the Universe Regarding the Holy Quran. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2016 Sep 10; 6(2): 5-15. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1395.6.2.3.3 [Article] [DOI]
52. Latifi M, Diba D. Data Mining of the Spatial Structure of Qajar Native Housing; Case Study: Jangjouyan House of Isfahan. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2020 Oct 10;10(3):163-71. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1399.10.3.7.7 [Article] [DOI]
53. Esmaeilian Toussi H, Etessam E. Analysis of the Architecture of the Industrial Heritage Using a Combined Method of Typology and Analytical Shape Grammar (Case Study of Textile Factories of Isfahan and Yazd in the Pahlavi Era). Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2019 Mar 10;9(1):1-12. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1398.9.1.6.5 [Article] [DOI]
54. Maghsoud M, Nasr T. ITC-based Technologies and Green Strategy for Contemporization of Tehran Silo. Naqshejahan-Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):1-9. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1401.12.1.2.2 [Article] [DOI]
55. Marashi A. “Rich Fields in Persia”: Parsi Capital and the Origins of Economic Development in Pahlavi Iran, 1925–1941. Iranian Studies. 2022:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/irn.2022.20 [Article] [DOI]
56. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Asadi S. Folded double-skin façade (DSF): in-depth evaluation of fold influence on the thermal and flow performance in naturally ventilated channels. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2021 Jun 16:1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2021.1941019 [Article] [DOI]
57. Ahmadi J, Mahdavinejad M, Larsen OK, Zhang C, Zarkesh A, Asadi S. Evaluating the different boundary conditions to simulate airflow and heat transfer in Double-Skin Facade. In Building Simulation 2022 May;15(5):799-815. Tsinghua University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0824-5 [Article] [DOI]
58. Askari A, Mahdavinejad M, Ansari M. Investigation of displacement ventilation performance under various room configurations using computational fluid dynamics simulation. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology. 2022 May 7;43(5):627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244221097312 [Article] [DOI]
59. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Window geometry impact on a room's wind comfort. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2021 Mar 24;28(9):2381-2410. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0075 [Article] [DOI]
60. Zafarmandi S, Mahdavinejad M, Norford L, Matzarakis A. Analyzing Thermal Comfort Sensations in Semi-Outdoor Space on a University Campus: On-Site Measurements in Tehran’s Hot and Cold Seasons. Atmosphere. 2022 June 22;13, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071034 [Article] [DOI]
61. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Haghighi HM, Atashdast A. Thermal and energy performance of a user-responsive microalgae bioreactive façade for climate adaptability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022 Aug 1;52:101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101894 [Article] [DOI]
62. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Pourghasemian MH. A new design to create natural ventilation in buildings: Wind chimney. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 Aug 22:105041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105041 [Article] [DOI]
63. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M, Zalooli A. Physico-mechanical and Chemical Properties of Coquina Stone Used as Heritage Building Stone in Bushehr, Iran. Geoheritage. 2022 Sep;14(3):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00738-0 [Article] [DOI]
64. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M. Prediction Indoor Thermal Comfort in Traditional Houses of Shiraz with PMV/PPD model. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2022 Jun 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2092774 [Article] [DOI]
65. Araoz GF. World-heritage historic urban landscapes: Defining and protecting authenticity. APT bulletin. 2008 Jan 1;39(2/3):33-7. Available from: http://orcp.hustoj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2008-World-Heritage-Historic-Urban-Landscapes-Defining-and-Protecting-Authenticity.pdf [Article]
66. Helles A. Metaphor and Simile as A design Tool to use Intangible Heritage in Contemporary Architecture-An Approach to Maintain Identity and Cultural Authenticity-Case of Gaza City. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research. 2019;24(4):8. Available from: https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/ejer/vol24/iss4/8/ [Article]
67. Pendlebury J, Short M, While A. Urban World Heritage Sites and the problem of authenticity. Cities. 2009 Dec 1;26(6):349-58. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275109001061 [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.