Volume 14, Issue 1 (2024)                   Naqshejahan 2024, 14(1): 48-65 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tahmouri A, Mansouri B, Azizi S. The Effective aspects of New Technology in the Creation of the Facade of Contemporary Iconic Buildings. Naqshejahan 2024; 14 (1) :48-65
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-70097-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , beh.mansouri@iauctb.ac.ir
Abstract:   (949 Views)
Aims: Technology is present in all stages of the architectural process in different forms. In the process of creation of the work, the facade of the building, as the outermost comprehensible element, which generally has the task of conveying the symbolic concepts of the work, plays a prominent role in the effectiveness of the new technologies of their era. The main goal of this research is to investigate and identify the effective aspects of technology on the creation of the facade of contemporary iconic buildings.

Methods: The research is combined. Through descriptive-analytical and historical methods, at the same time, the role of the icon and its impact on iconic architecture, as well as the aspects of the effects of new technology on architecture, based on the Vitruvian principles, have been investigated, and in the following, the factors affecting the use of new technology in the creation of the facade of iconic buildings.

Findings: According to the hypothesis test, the technology variable has a significant effect on the creation of the landmark facade of iconic buildings, and this means that with the increase in the presence of new technology, the amount of realization of the landmark facade will be increased.

Conclusion: Technology is a growing process that interacts continuously with all structures of human life today. What has been forgotten in the contemporary era is the need to match the process of designing and building the artificial environment with the dynamic issue in the essence of technology.
 
Full-Text [PDF 2422 kb]   (828 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2023/03/25 | Accepted: 2023/07/8 | Published: 2024/03/24

References
1. Mousavimehr S. Language and its Relation to Technology in Heidegger's Philosophy. Existence and Knowledge, 2019; 6(1): 191-208. https://dx.doi.org/10.22096/ek.2020.108106.1144 [Article] [DOI]
2. Heidegger M. The question concerning technology, and other essays. Garland Publishing. 1997. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf [Article]
3. Van Khai T. The development of the architectural form of a tower derived from a traditional and philosophical symbol, realized by solutions of high-class technologies. The case of the Bitexco Financial Tower. E3S Web Conf. 2018; 33: 10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183301018 [Article] [DOI]
4. Haghir S, Masalegoo M. The Impact of Modern Architecture on Expanding the Domain of Audience Consciousness and Its Derivation from the Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of “Body-Subject”. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar. 2020; 17(87): 19-28. [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.186937.4128 [Article]
6. Kia A, Mahdavinejad M. Interactive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 2020; 10(2):37-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30495/IJAUD.2020.15848 [Article] [DOI]
8. Filipova M. Design and National Identity. Journal of Design History. 2017; 30(4): 425-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epx031 [Article] [DOI]
10. Hossein Razavi, S., Davodpour, Z., Tabibian, M., Moeinifar, M. Social Innovation in the Interaction of Citizenship Dichotomy and Hybrid Spaceof 21stCentury Cities (Case Study: Tehran). Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 2019; 4(9): 37-58. [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2021.56012.1257 [Article] [DOI]
12. Elhagla K, Nassar D, Ragheb M. Iconic buildings’ contribution toward urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2020; 59(2): 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.020 [Article] [DOI]
13. Mikhailov S, Mikhailova A, Nadyrshine N, Koshkin D, Egorov D. Local artistic style formation in urban environment design. 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering. 2021; 274. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401002 [Article] [DOI]
14. Baghaee A. The Role of Structure in the Aesthetics of Contemporary Architecture. Hoviatshahr. 2008; 3(4): 27-39. [Persian] https://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_1099.html?lang=en [Article]
15. Kuleeva L, Burova T, Listovskaya L, Ibragimova A, Saifullina I. Feature of Modern Methods of Forming Embankments. 2020; 890. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012005 [Article] [DOI]
16. Mikhailova A, Mikhailov S, Khousnutdinova L, Ibragimova A, Belov M. National and International Components in Contemporary Architecture and Design. 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering. 2021; 274. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401003 [Article] [DOI]
17. Dimitrova V, Grubbauer M. The icon as a collaborative performance: non-standard solutions, invisible work and networks of trust in the construction of the Elbe Philharmonic Hall, Hamburg. Archnet-IJAR. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-03-2021-0058 [Article] [DOI]
18. Sklair L. The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities and capitalist globalization. New York, Architectural Press, Oxford. 2017. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190464189.001.0001 [Article] [DOI]
19. Sklair L. Iconic Architecture and the Culture-ideology of Consumerism. Theory, Culture & Society Journal. 2010; 27(5): 135-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410374634 [Article] [DOI]
20. Mahdavinejad, M. High-performance Architecture: Search for Future Legacy in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2017; 9(17): 129-138. Available from: http://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_44611.html?lang=en
22. Vera A, Yulia B. The monitoring of technical condition of cultural heritage objects. E3S Web Conf. 2019; 91: 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199105020 [Article] [DOI]
23. Koshkin D, Kudryasheva E, Khafizov R, Salyakhutdinov R, Ibragimova A. Temporary Identification Style of Urban Areas. 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering. 2021; 274. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401010 [Article] [DOI]
24. Shershneva, E. G. Architectural and Technological Dialogue: Development of “New City” Generation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021; 1079(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1079/2/022001 [Article] [DOI]
26. Mohamed AS. Theorizing Building Technology in Environmental Architecture: Towards Adaptive Methodology. EQA-International Journal of Environmental Quality. 2020 Jan 17;38:1-4. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/9883 [Article] [DOI]
28. Amini M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Future of Interactive Architecture in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities in Case of Tehran. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.9 [Article] [DOI]
30. Vera A, Yulia B. Vertical cities – the new form of high-rise construction evolution. E3S Web Conf. 2018; 33: 11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183301041 [Article] [DOI]
31. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2019;43(1):71. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.5209 [Article] [DOI]
33. Tahmouri A, Mansouri B, Azizi S. Iconic Aspect of Technology in Production of Heritage of Contemporary Architecture. Naqshejahan 2022; 12 (3) :22-41. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1401.12.3.3.7 [Article]
35. Dezfuli RR, Bazazzadeh H, Taban M, Mahdavinejad M. Optimizing stack ventilation in low and medium-rise residential buildings in hot and semi-humid climate. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2023 Oct 28:103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103555 [Article] [DOI]
36. Mahdavinejad M, Shaeri J, Nezami A, Goharian A. Comparing universal thermal climate index (UTCI) with selected thermal indices to evaluate outdoor thermal comfort in traditional courtyards with BWh climate. Urban Climate. 2024 Mar 1;54:101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101839 [Article] [DOI]
37. Kasraei MHossein, Nourian Y, Mahdavinejad M. Girih for domes: analysis of three Iranian domes. Nexus Netw J. 2016;18,311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-015-0282-4 [Article] [DOI]
39. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. E&ES. 2017 Aug; 83(1): 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012020 [Article] [DOI]
41. Diba D. Contemporary architecture of Iran. Architectural Design. 2012 May;82(3):70-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1406 [Article] [DOI]
43. Mahdavinejad M. Education of Architectural Criticism. Honarhayeziba, 2005; 23(23): 69‐76. [Persian] Available from: https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_10716_617fad24a868a77cfa080aa5833a1b2c.pdf [Article]
44. Pourjafar M, Mahmoudinejad H, Ahadian O. Design with nature in bio-architecture with emphasis on the hidden rules of natural organism. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2011 Jul;1(4):74-83. Available from: http://www.ijastnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No4_July_2011/9.pdf [Article]
45. Salama AM. Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2019 Mar 18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-01-2019-0012 [Article] [DOI]
46. Noghrekar, A., hamzenejad, M., forouzande, E. Eternity Secret of Architectural Works (In Modernism, Post Modernism and More Inclusive View). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 2009; 6(12): 32-44. Available from: http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_31.html?lang=en [Article]
47. Smallwood J. Architects and Architectural Technologist: Their Influence on Construction Ergonomics. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa.2009; 21(2). Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC33284 [Article] [DOI]
49. Kwinter S. 2008, Architecture of Time_Toward a Theory of the Event in Modernist Culture. MIT Press, London. 2002: 251. Available from: http://www.mom.arq.ufmg.br/mom/02_arq_interface/6a_aula/kwinter_chap1.pdf [Article]
51. Pieris A, Lozanovska M. Industry + architecture: National narratives/international forces. Fabrications Journal. 2019; 29(2): 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1587129 [Article] [DOI]
52. Bakhtiarian M. Formalism form the Viewpoint of Clive Bell and Niklas Luhmann. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi. 2014; 19(3): 13-18. [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2014.55398 [Article] [DOI]
53. Bakhtiarian M. A Reflection on the Contemporary Philosophical Discussions on Meaninglessness in Art. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi. 2016; 21(2): 5-14. [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2016.59639 [Article] [DOI]
55. Sklair L, Whitelegg J, Clarke D. Book Reviews: Do cities need Architectural Icons?. SAGE Journals. 2006; 43(10): 1899-1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600888627 [Article] [DOI]
56. 39. Sklair L, Fanning Madden J, Jaret CH, Book Reviews. SAGE Journals. 2002; 39(1): 163-178.
58. Ponzini D, Alawadi KH. Transnational mobilities of the tallest building: origins, mobilization and urban effects of Dubai’s Burj Khalifa. European Planning Studies. 2021; 30(1): 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1908233 [Article] [DOI]
60. Tanimoto L., W.Kent E. Architectures and Algorithms for Iconic-to-Symbolic Transformations. Pattern Recognition Journal. 1990; 23(12): 1377-1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(90)90084-X [Article] [DOI]
61. Alaily-Mattar N, Bartmanski D, Dreher J, Koch M, Löw M, Pape T, Thierstein A. Unpacking the effects of star architecture projects. Archnet-IJAR, 2021; 15(2): 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-05-2020-0092 [Article] [DOI]
63. Habibi M, Armaghan M, Raeisi, I, Khansari S. Content Analysis of Oppositions Journal’s Approach to after Modernism Architectural Theories (1973-1984). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 2021; 18(94): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.218958.4457 [Article] [DOI]
64. Pandya S. Architecture in national identities: a critical review. National Identities Journal. 2020; 22(4): 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2020.1812825 [Article] [DOI]
65. Shahrokhi, S., Niknami, K., Izadi, M. The role of two components of “conservation” and “dynamism” in the revitalization of architectural heritage based on the continuity of place values (Case study: Architectural heritage of Choghaznabil historical site). Soffeh, 2021. Available from: https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_101881.html?lang=en [Article]
67. Schumacher P. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. John Wiley & Sons; 2011 Apr 20. Available from: http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia05_048.content.pdf [Article]
69. Abastante F, Corrente S, Greco S, Ishizaka A, Lami IM. Choice architecture for architecture choices: Evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral. Land Use Policy. 2018 Nov 1;78:748-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.037 [Article] [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.