Volume 12, Issue 3 (2022)
Naqshejahan 2022, 12(3): 22-41 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tahmouri A, Mansouri B, Azizi S. Iconic Aspect of Technology in Production of Heritage of Contemporary Architecture. Naqshejahan 2022; 12 (3) :22-41
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-61722-en.html
URL: http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-61722-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,Beh.Mansouri@iauctb.ac.ir
2- Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (2493 Views)
Aims: Architecture as one of the ways to create a work, while using art, is a combination of thought and technology. What sets an architectural work apart from other works is that it is more valuable than providing shelter; In other words, in addition to the functional aspect, it also expresses the characteristic of beauty and higher transcendent concepts. This type of architecture, as a valuable heritage, has the ability to remain in history and the role of technology in the production of such heritage has always been one of the influential parameters. When an architectural design is formed as a special work of art, it is affected by the technology and it has become symbolic in this state. The purpose of this study is to investigate this secondary aspect of technology and its role in the production of heritage of contemporary architecture.
Methods: The research is Combined and uses a Grounded Theory. Through descriptive-analytical methods, by examining the heritage of contemporary architecture as well as the aspects of the effects of technology and its role, the factors affecting architecture have been analyzed
Findings: Examining the identity samples of contemporary architecture as a lasting heritage with different geographical distribution shows that jointly the characteristics of form, function and beauty in the areas of formal configuration, spatial organization and facade composition can be analyzed and compared.
Conclusion: The nature of the architecture of funds at the intersection of art, science, technique, depending on the time and the context has been changed and the creation of a lasting architectural heritage has depended on the level of technological advancement of its time.
Methods: The research is Combined and uses a Grounded Theory. Through descriptive-analytical methods, by examining the heritage of contemporary architecture as well as the aspects of the effects of technology and its role, the factors affecting architecture have been analyzed
Findings: Examining the identity samples of contemporary architecture as a lasting heritage with different geographical distribution shows that jointly the characteristics of form, function and beauty in the areas of formal configuration, spatial organization and facade composition can be analyzed and compared.
Conclusion: The nature of the architecture of funds at the intersection of art, science, technique, depending on the time and the context has been changed and the creation of a lasting architectural heritage has depended on the level of technological advancement of its time.
Keywords: New Technologies, Icon, Modern Heritage, Contemporary Architecture of Iran, Architectural Design, Modernity, Technology
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Highperformance Architecture
Received: 2022/04/21 | Accepted: 2022/07/27 | Published: 2022/09/23
Received: 2022/04/21 | Accepted: 2022/07/27 | Published: 2022/09/23
References
1. Mousavimehr S. Language and its Relation to Technology in Heidegger's Philosophy. Existence and Knowledge. 2019; 6(1): 191-208. https://dx.doi.org/10.22096/ek.2020.108106.1144 [Article] [DOI]
2. Heidegger M. The question concerning technology, and other essays. Garland Publishing. 1997. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf [Article]
3. Van Khai T. The development of the architectural form of a tower derived from a traditional and philosophical symbol, realized by solutions of high-class technologies. The case of the Bitexco Financial Tower. E3S Web Conf. 2018; 33: 10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183301018 [Article] [DOI]
4. Haghir, S., Masalegoo, M. The Impact of Modern Architecture on Expanding the Domain of Audience Consciousness and Its Derivation from the Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of “Body-Subject”. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar. 2020; 17(87): 19-28.
https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.186937.4128 [Article] [DOI]
6. Kia A, Mahdavinejad M. Interactive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 2020; 10(2):37-48. https://doi.org/10.30495/IJAUD.2020.15848 [Article] [DOI]
8. Filipova M. Design and National Identity. Journal of Design History. 2017; 30(4): 425-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epx031 [Article] [DOI]
10. Hossein Razavi S, Davodpour Z, Tabibian M, Moeinifar M. Social Innovation in the Interaction of Citizenship Dichotomy and Hybrid Spaceof 21stCentury Cities (Case Study: Tehran). Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning. 2019; 4(9): 37-58. [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2021.56012.1257 [Article] [DOI]
12. Elhagla K, Nassar D, Ragheb M. Iconic buildings’ contribution toward urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2020; 59(2): 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.020 [Article] [DOI]
13. Mikhailov S, Mikhailova A, Nadyrshine N, Koshkin D, Egorov D. Local artistic style formation in urban environment design. 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering. 2021; 274. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401002 [Article] [DOI]
14. Baghaee A. The Role of Structure in the Aesthetics of Contemporary Architecture. Hoviatshahr. 2008; 3(4): 27-39. [Persian] https://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_1099.html?lang=en [Article]
15. Kuleeva L, Burova T, Listovskaya L, Ibragimova A, Saifullina I. Feature of Modern Methods of Forming Embankments. 2020; 890. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012005 [Article] [DOI]
16. Mikhailova A, Mikhailov S, Khousnutdinova L, Ibragimova A, Belov M. National and International Components in Contemporary Architecture and Design. 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering. 2021; 274. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401003 [Article] [DOI]
17. Dimitrova V, Grubbauer M. The icon as a collaborative performance: non-standard solutions, invisible work and networks of trust in the construction of the Elbe Philharmonic Hall, Hamburg. Archnet-IJAR. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-03-2021-0058 [Article] [DOI]
18. Sklair, L. The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities and capitalist globalization. New York, Architectural Press, Oxford. 2017. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190464189.001.0001 [Article] [DOI]
19. Sklair L. Iconic Architecture and the Culture-ideology of Consumerism. Theory, Culture & Society Journal. 2010; 27(5): 135-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410374634 [Article] [DOI]
20. Mahdavinejad, M. High-performance Architecture: Search for Future Legacy in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 2017; 9(17): 129-138. [Article]
22. Vera A, Yulia B. The monitoring of technical condition of cultural heritage objects. E3S Web Conf. 2019; 91: 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199105020 [Article]
23. Koshkin D, Kudryasheva E, Khafizov R, Salyakhutdinov R, Ibragimova A. Temporary Identification Style of Urban Areas. 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering. 2021; 274. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401010 [Article]
24. Shershneva, E. G. Architectural and Technological Dialogue: Development of “New City” Generation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021; 1079(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1079/2/022001 [Article] [DOI]
26. Mohamed AS. Theorizing Building Technology in Environmental Architecture: Towards Adaptive Methodology. EQA-International Journal of Environmental Quality. 2020 Jan 17;38:1-4. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/9883 [Article] [DOI]
28. Amini M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Future of Interactive Architecture in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities in Case of Tehran. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.9 [Article] [DOI]
30. Vera A, Yulia B. Vertical cities – the new form of high-rise construction evolution. E3S Web Conf. 2018; 33: 11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183301041 [Article] [DOI]
31. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2019;43(1):71. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.5209 [Article] [DOI]
33. Haghir, S., Salavati, K. Iranians’ Positive Criticism on European Architecture and Its Correlation with Their Negative Criticism on Iranian Architecture and Town Planning during the Late Qajar Era. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar. 2020; 17(83): 5-14. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.188582.4146 [Article] [DOI]
35. Lambert S. Design in the 20th Century: Form Follows Function?. Journal of Design History. 1994; 7(4): 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/7.4.306 [Article] [DOI]
36. Kasraei MH, Nourian Y, Mahdavinejad M. Girih for domes: analysis of three Iranian domes. Nexus Netw J. 2016;18,311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-015-0282-4 [Article] [DOI]
38. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. E&ES. 2017 Aug; 83(1): 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012020 [Article] [DOI]
40. Diba D. Contemporary architecture of Iran. Architectural Design. 2012 May;82(3):70-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1406 [Article] [DOI]
42. Ahmadi M, Ansari M, Bemanian M. Geometric Data Mining and Shape Grammar of Relationship between House and Islamic Iranian Lifestyle. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 Apr 10;11(1):1-14. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.1.6.9 [Article] [DOI]
43. Kwinter S. 2008, Architecture of Time_Toward a Theory of the Event in Modernist Culture. MIT Press, London. 2002: 251. Available from: http://www.mom.arq.ufmg.br/mom/02_arq_interface/6a_aula/kwinter_chap1.pdf [Article]
44. Ansari S, Andalib A. An Evaluation Framework for Measuring Participation in Urban Renovation Projects and it’s Application in The Special Renovation Project of Shahid-Khoob-Bakht Neighborhood. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2016 Jul 10;6(1):5-17. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1395.6.1.5.3 [Article] [DOI]
45. Pieris A, Lozanovska M. Industry + architecture: National narratives/international forces. Fabrications Journal. 2019; 29(2): 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1587129 [Article] [DOI]
46. Bakhtiarian, M. Formalism form the Viewpoint of Clive Bell and Niklas Luhmann. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi. 2014; 19(3): 13-18. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2014.55398 [Article] [DOI]
47. Bakhtiarian, M. A Reflection on the Contemporary Philosophical Discussions on Meaninglessness in Art. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi. 2016; 21(2): 5-14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2016.59639 [Article] [DOI]
48. Behnava B, Pourzargar M. Impact of New Materials on Dynamics of Four Recent Decades in Iranian Architecture 1980-2020. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 Nov 10;11(3):49-66. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.3.5.2 [Article] [DOI]
49. Khademzadeh MH, Mahmoudi P. Iranian Intellectuals, the National Heritage and the History of Iranian Architecture in the Period between the Constitution and the end of Reza Shah’s Reign; A Story of Conflict and Evolution. Soffeh. 2020; 30(2): 111-121. https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.30.2.111 [Article] [DOI]
50. Sklair L, Whitelegg J, Clarke D. Book Reviews: Do cities need Architectural Icons?. SAGE Journals. 2006; 43(10): 1899-1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600888627 [Article] [DOI]
51. Sklair L, Fanning Madden J, Jaret CH, Book Reviews. SAGE Journals. 2002; 39(1): 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00420980220099140 [Article] [DOI]
52. Diba D. L'Iran et l'architecture contemporaine. Mimar (Singapore). 1991;38:20-25. [French] Available from: francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19648743 [Article]
53. Ponzini D, Alawadi KH. Transnational mobilities of the tallest building: origins, mobilization and urban effects of Dubai’s Burj Khalifa. European Planning Studies. 2021; 30(1): 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1908233 [Article] [DOI]
54. Rasoolzadeh M, Moshari M. Prioritizing for Healthy Urban Planning: Interaction of Modern Chemistry and Green Material-based Computation. Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2021 May 10;11(1):94-105. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.1.7.0 [Article] [DOI]
55. L.Tanimoto, W.Kent E. Architectures and Algorithms for Iconic-to-Symbolic Transformations. Pattern Recognition Journal. 1990; 23(12): 1377-1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(90)90084-X [Article] [DOI]
56. Alaily-Mattar N, Bartmanski D, Dreher J, Koch M, Löw M, Pape T, Thierstein A. Unpacking the effects of star architecture projects. Archnet-IJAR. 2021; 15(2): 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-05-2020-0092 [Article] [DOI]
57. Samadzadehyazdi S, Ansari M, Bemanian M.R. Environment Sustainability through Adaptive Reuse (Case Study: Industrial Heritage of Iran). Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2019; 9(1):67-77. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1398.9.1.2.1 [Article] [DOI]
58. Habibi M, Armaghan M, Raeisi, I, Khansari S. Content Analysis of Oppositions Journal’s Approach to after Modernism Architectural Theories (1973-1984). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 2021; 18(94): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.218958.4457 [Article] [DOI]
59. Pandya S. Architecture in national identities: a critical review. National Identities Journal. 2020; 22(4): 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2020.1812825 [Article] [DOI]
60. Shahrokhi, S., Niknami, K., Izadi, M. The role of two components of “conservation” and “dynamism” in the revitalization of architectural heritage based on the continuity of place values (Case study: Architectural heritage of Choghaznabil historical site). Soffeh, 2021. Available from: https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_101881.html?lang=en [Article]
61. Zafarmandi S, Mahdavinejad M, Norford L, Matzarakis A. Analyzing Thermal Comfort Sensations in Semi-Outdoor Space on a University Campus: On-Site Measurements in Tehran’s Hot and Cold Seasons. Atmosphere. 2022 June 22;13, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071034 [Article] [DOI]
62. Schumacher P. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. John Wiley & Sons; 2011 Apr 20. Available from: http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia05_048.content.pdf [Article]
63. Shahhosseini G, Moulaii M. Explaining the Role and Place of Industrial Heritage in Improving the Quality Characteristics of the Hierarchy of the City Entrances (Case study: Brick Furnaces in the Entrance of Hamedan). Naqshejahan - Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2019 Mar 10;9(1):13-22. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1398.9.1.3.2 [Article] [DOI]
64. Heravi H, Falamaki M, Tahaei A. Reflection of Feminine Archetypes in Iranian Historical Architecture through the lens of Jung; The Code of Femininity in the Mandala Schemas of Iranian Historical Architecture. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. 2020; 16(80): 51-62. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.144622.3740 [Article] [DOI]
65. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Markazi A.H.D., Bemanian M. Architectural layout design through deep learning and agent-based modeling: A hybrid approach. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 April15; 47, 103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103822 [Article] [DOI]
66. Falahat M, Kamali L, Shahidi S. The Role of the “Sense of Place” Concept in Improving Architectural Conservation Quality. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. 2017; 14(46): 15-22. Available from: http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_44351.html?lang=en [Article]
67. Shaeri J, Mahdavinejad M. Prediction Indoor Thermal Comfort in Traditional Houses of Shiraz with PMV/PPD model. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2022 Jun 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2092774 [Article] [DOI]
68. John N. Australian Communication Design History: An Indigenous Retelling. Journal of Design History. 2018; 31(3): 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epy014 [Article] [DOI]
69. Charleson AW, Pirie S. An investigation of structural engineer-architect collaboration. SESOC Journal. 2009 Apr;22(1):97. Available from: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.953777290334543 [Article]
70. Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Haghighi HM, Atashdast A. Thermal and energy performance of a user-responsive microalgae bioreactive façade for climate adaptability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022 Aug 1;52:101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101894 [Article] [DOI]
71. Abastante F, Corrente S, Greco S, Ishizaka A, Lami IM. Choice architecture for architecture choices: Evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral. Land Use Policy. 2018 Nov 1;78:748-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.037 [Article]
72. Javanroodi K, Nik VM, Mahdavinejad M. A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 49:101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101597 [Article] [DOI]
73. Rahbar M, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Davaie Markazi AH, Hovestadt L. Generating Synthetic Space Allocation Probability Layouts Based on Trained Conditional-GANs. Applied Artificial Intelligence. 2019 Jul 3;33(8):689-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1592919 [Article] [DOI]
74. Pourjafar M, Mahmoudinejad H, Ahadian O. Design with nature in bio-architecture with emphasis on the hidden rules of natural organism. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2011 Jul;1(4):74-83. Available from: http://www.ijastnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No4_July_2011/9.pdf [Article]
75. Salama AM. Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2019 Mar 18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-01-2019-0012 [Article] [DOI]
76. Noghrekar, A., hamzenejad, M., forouzande, E. Eternity Secret of Architectural Works (In Modernism, Post Modernism and More Inclusive View). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. 2009; 6(12): 31-44. Available from: http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_31.html?lang=en [Article]
77. Smallwood J. Architects and Architectural Technologist: Their Influence on Construction Ergonomics. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa. 2009; 21(2). Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC33284 [Article]
78. Siadatian S, Pourjafar M. Testing the Application of "Justified Plan Graph"(JPG) in Iranian-Islamic Architecture Case Studies: Rasoolian House in Yazd and a House in Masooleh Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2015;4(3):27-39. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1393.4.3.4.2 [Article] [DOI]
79. Saadatjoo P, Mahdavinejad M, Zhang G, Vali K. Influence of permeability ratio on wind-driven ventilation and cooling load of mid-rise buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Jul 1;70:102894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102894 [Article] [DOI]
80. Pourjafar M R, Pourjafar A, Safdari S. Various Types of Islamic City and Pointing Out to Defining the Major Aspects of Ideal Islamic City. Iran University of Science & Technology. 2015;3 (3):1-17. Available from: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-269-fa.html [Article]
81. Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Daneshjoo K. Designerly optimization of devices (as reflectors) to improve daylight and scrutiny of the light-well’s configuration. Building Simulation. 2021 Oct 9 (pp. 1-24). Tsinghua University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0839-y [Article] [DOI]
82. Diba D, Dehbashi M. Trends in modern Iranian architecture. J Iran Archit Chang Soc. 2004:31-41. Available from: https://b2n.ir/a12379 [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |