Challenges of Using Building Regulations in Architecture from the Perspective of Design Research

نویسندگان
Asghar Mohammad-Moradia 1
Mohammad Ali Khan-Mohammadi 2
Mojtaba Pour-Ahmadi 3
1 Professor of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science & Technology
2 Assistant Professor of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science & Technology
3 PhD researcher of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science & Technology
چکیده
The use of building regulations in architectural design has been a controversial issue for a long time. From the view point of critics, building regulations inhibit innovation, promote conservative design and are incapable of insuring design quality. From the defenders point of view, some professional mentalities of architects regarding building regulations are problematical and must be changed. The present research aims to illuminate the reasons for the above-mentioned tension between architectural design and building regulations. This is done by examining the structural match between architectural design and building regulations. Seeing from a designer point of view, the paper compares formal characteristics of building regulations with architectural design. Three general characteristics of building regulations are found in contrast to characteristics of architectural design. Building regulations are analytical in nature, while architectural design is a synthesis-oriented act. Building regulations are mainly based on a reductionist approach towards defining design problems and solutions, while innovation and originality are considered as fundamental values by most architects. And thirdly, building regulations are usually framed in a way that matches an evaluative mode of thought, while architects often have to work in a generative and predictive mode. These explain why architects from time to time feel frustrated with regulations. The paper continues to make recommendations to both architectural designers and regulators. To the designers some facts and points are stated to help them better understand the nature and performance of building regulations and guide them safely and positively use regulations in their design process. Addressing the legislators, the paper offers some recommendations to facilitate the use of building regulations in architectural design. Moving towards performance-based regulations, a broader involvement of information technology in building regulations, and production of designer-oriented guidance documents are some of these recommendations.
[1] Lawson, B. What Designers Know, Architectural Press, 2004.
[2] Groat, L, Wang, D, Architectural Research Methods, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002.
[3] Carmona, M, Magalhães, C, Local environmental quality: establishing acceptable standards in England, TPR, 80 (4-5), 517-548, 2009.
[4] Gann, D M, Wang, Y, Hawkins R, Do regulations encourage innovation? - the case of energy efficiency in housing, Building Research & Information, 26 (5), 280-296, 1998.
[5] Imrie, R, Street, E, Architectural Design and Regulation, Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[6] Punter, J, Design Guidelines in American Cities: A Review of Design Policies and Guidance in Five West Coast Cities, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1999.
[7] Saint, A. Lessons from London, in Echenique, M. and Saint, A. (eds.), Cities for the New Millenium, Spon Press, London, 2001.[8] Lawson, B, How Designers Think: The design process demystified. Architectural Press, 2005.
[9] Carmona, M, Marshal, S, Stevens, Q, Design Codes: Their Use and Potential. Progress in Planning, 65, 209-289, 2006.
[10] Street, E, Project Paper 2: Architecture and the regulation of design: a review. Department of Geography, King’s College London, 2006.
[11] Heywood, F, Understanding Needs: A Starting Point for Quality. Housing Studies, 19 (5), 709-726, 2004.
[12] Carmona, M, Design control — bridging the professional divide, part 1: A new framework, Journal of Urban Design, 3:2, 175-200, 1998.
[13] Lawson, B, Upside down and back to front: architects and the building laws. RIBA Journal 82(4), 25-28, 1975.
[14] Lawson, B, Design and the Evidence. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 30-37, 2013.
[15] LDSA (London District Surveyors Association), Stephenson, J, Building Regulations Explained 2004 Revision. London and New York: Spon Press, 2005.
[16] Harmon, S, K, Kennon, K, E, The Codes Guidebook for Interiors, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2005.
[17] Imrie, R, The role of the building regulations in achieving housing quality, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 419-437, 2004.
[18] Nelissen, N. J. M, Vocht, C. L. F. M. D, Design control in the Netherlands. Built Environment, 20 (2), 142-156, 1994.
[19] Loveridge, R, Building regulation: from prescription to performance. In: Rick Best and Gerard de Valence (Eds.) Design and construction: Building in value. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
[20] Bureau of National Building Regulations, Part 4: General Building Requirements. Tehran: Nashre Tose’e ye Iran, 2013.
[21] Sheridan, L, Visscher, H J, Meijer, F M, Building regulations in Europe – Part II: A comparison of the technical requirements in eight European countries. Delft: Delft University Press (DUP Science), 2003.
[22] Bureau of National Building Regulations, Part 3: Building Fire Protection. Tehran: Nashre Tose’e ye Iran, 2013.
[23] Cross, N, Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5), pp. 427–441, 2004.
[24] Lawson, B R, Science, legislation and architecture. In: B. Evans, J. A. Powell, and R. J. Talbot (Eds.) Changing Design. New York, John Wiley, 1982.
[25] Meacham, B, Bowen, R, Traw, J, Moore, A, Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs. Building Research & Information, 33:2, 91-106, 2005.
[26] Lawson, B, Cognitive Strategies in Architectural Design. ERGONOMICS, 22: 1, 59-68, 1979.
[27] Voordt, D J M, Wegen, H B R, Architecture in Use: an introduction to the programming, design and evaluation of buildings. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2005.
[28] Giddings, B, Sharma, M, Jones, P, Jensen, P, An evaluation tool for design quality: PFI sheltered housing. Building Research and Information, 41:6, 690-705, 2013.
[29] Carmona, M, Sieh, L, Measuring Quality in Planning: Managing the Performance Process. London and New York: Spon Press, 2004.
[30] Carmona, M, Controlling urban design—part 1: A possible renaissance?, Journal of Urban Design, 1:1, 47-73, 1996.
[31] Mahdavinejad, M, Bemanian, M, Molaee, M, Architecture in Context: Inspiration of Conceptualism in Design, Naqshejahan, 1: 1, 21-34.